Three new suggested guidelines for increased transparency regarding open access article processing charges (APCs)

PDF (English)
Pubblicato: Jul 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.24208
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Abstract

The article processing charge (APC) lies at the heart of the gold open access (GOA) business model. Small and larger society-based, as well as commercial publishers, rely – to different extents – on the APC and the GOA model to thrive. There is wide debate regarding what amount of APC is considered to be exploitative, and the issue of low APCs is often erroneously associated with “predatory” OA publishing. Independent of this debate, there is still, surprisingly, considerable opacity related to the APC used to cover the cost of  GOA. In a bid to increase transparency, a simple 3-point plan at increasing academic and financial transparency of authors and journals/publishers regarding APCs is proposed: 1) indicate which author paid the APC in multi-author papers; 2) indicate the value of the APC paid; 3) provide online proof or certification of APC payment, including the indication of any discounts or waivers.

Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Publishing partner
Creative Commons License

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Asai, S. (2020). Market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals. Scientometrics 123(2): 1037-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03402-y
Crawford. W. (2018). GOAJ3: Gold open access journals 2012–2017. 2018. https://walt.lishost.org/2018/05/goaj3-gold-open-access-journals-2012-2017/ (last accessed: June 30, 2020)
Khoo, S.T.-S. (2019). Article processing charge hyperinflation and price insensitivity: An open access sequel to the serials crisis. Liber Quarterly 29(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10280
Lawson, S. (2015). Fee waivers for open access journals. Publications 3(3): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3030155
Lubowitz, J.H., Brand, J.C., Rossi, M.J., & Provencher, M.T. (2017). "Open Access" requires clarification: medical journal publication models evolve. Arthroscopy 33(3): 497-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.009
Morrison, H. (2018). Global OA APCs (APC) 2010–2017: Major trends. ELPUB 2018, 10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.16, Toronto, Canada. https://elpub.episciences.org/4604/pdf (last accessed: June 30, 2020).
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2017). The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): science publishing’s miscalculating metric. Academic Questions 30(4): 433-441. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-017-9671-3
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2020). The ICMJE recommendations: challenges in fortifying publishing integrity. Irish Journal of Medical Science (in press) http://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02227-1
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J., Tsigaris, P., Al-Khatib, A. (2019a) Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45(6): 102071. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Tsigaris, P., Al-Khatib, A. (2019b). Open access mega-journals: quality, economics and post-publication peer review infrastructure. Publishing Research Quarterly 35(3): 418-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09654-8
Puoi leggere altri articoli dello stesso autore/i