What is the Practical Significance of the Relation between Gender Equality and Ecological Balance?


Published: Dec 29, 2020
Keywords:
ecology feminism eco-feminism capitalism gender inequalities climate change
Nagia Kloukina
Abstract

Nowadays it is indisputable that climate change is a global phenomenon. On the one hand, there have recently been ever-increasing efforts by the international non-governmental institutions (NGOs), including the European Union (EU), to combat climate change either through mitigation or adaptation methods or both. On the other hand, the whole “planet rescue package” is integrated within a “greener” capitalist system, from the governance of which the environmental damages actually originate as a result of the maximum possible capital accumulation at the expense of the weaker. Climate change is thus involved in a vicious circle and produces as well as maintains social discriminations. Gender inequality as a form of social discriminations is therefore involved in the same vicious circle of the neoliberal way of addressing societal problems. Recognizing the great spectrum of analyzing climate change policy within a political structure, namely capitalism, only the connection between the devastating dominance of the human over nature and the still existing marginalization of women in the modern era will be elaborated. The aim of this paper is therefore to outline and analyze the basic framework of the eco-feminist movement about the interrelated environmental degradation and the underestimation towards women, as the feminine gender symbolizes nature.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Nagia Kloukina, University of Groningen

Nagia Kloukina has graduated from the Law School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens and she holds an MA in Energy Law and Climate from the University of Groningen, Netherlands.

References
Eisler, R. (1988). The Chalice and the Blade: Our History, Our Future. San Fransisco: Harper and Row.
Engels, F. (1992). The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.
European Parliament (2012). Report on women and climate change. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0049_EN.html (Accessed: November 25, 2020).
European Parliament (2017). Report on women, gender equality and climate justice. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0403_EN.html (Accessed: November 25, 2020).
Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters (Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction). Available at: https://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf (Accessed: 25 November 2020).
Karen, W. (2000). ‘What are Ecofeminists saying?’ in Ecofeminist Philosophy: a Western perspective on what it is and why it matters, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield.
Miles, K. (2020). Ecofeminsm: Sociology and Environmentalism. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ecofeminism (accessed November 24, 2020).
Plumwood V. (1992). Feminism and Ecofeminism: beyond the dualistic assumptions of women, men and nature. The Ecologist, 22(1), January/February.
Shiva, V. (1988), Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books Ltd.
UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. Global Action for Women towards Sustainable and Equitable Development, Chapter 24. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf