test A Union in Transition: Reforming Institutions and Embracing Enlargement for Strategic Resilience|HAPSc Policy Briefs Series

A Union in Transition: Reforming Institutions and Embracing Enlargement for Strategic Resilience

PDF (English)
Publiée : Jun 30, 2025
DOI : https://doi.org/10.12681/hapscpbs.43199
Spyridoula Giannopoulou
Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Greece.
Résumé

This policy brief examines the European Union’s urgent need to reform its institutional architecture while strategically managing its next wave of enlargement. In light of global instability, ranging from the war in Ukraine to broader geopolitical rivalries, the EU must address internal challenges such as its democratic deficit, opaque decision-making, and weak public engagement. Simultaneously, external pressures from authoritarian powers like China and Russia amplify the need for a more cohesive and resilient Union. The 2023 Enlargement Package and the Schengen accession of Bulgaria and Romania mark renewed momentum for EU expansion. However, without significant internal reforms, this momentum risks stalling. The brief proposes key reforms: fusing the EU’s dual executive roles into one directly elected president, enhancing the European Parliament’s legislative powers, activating the Lisbon Treaty’s passerelle clauses, and introducing new pre-accession tools such as regional integration hubs and civic fellowships. These measures aim to enhance democratic legitimacy, operational effectiveness, and the Union’s global standing. By aligning its governance with citizen expectations and strategic realities, the EU can not only attract new members but also deepen cohesion among existing ones, ensuring a sustainable, values-driven expansion in a more competitive international environment. 

Article Details
  • Rubrique
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Références
Alexandris, A. (2025). The Rise of Radical Right and Eurosceptic Political Forces and the Impact on the EU’s Enlargement Policy. ELIAMEP.
Blockmans, S. (2025). A New but Ambiguous Momentum in EU Enlargement. International Centre for Defence and Security. Available at: https://icds.ee/en/a-new-but-ambiguous-momentum-in-eu-enlargement/ (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Buras, P. & Morina, E. (2023). Catch-27: The Contradictory Thinking About Enlargement in the EU. European Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/catch-27-the-contradictory-thinking-about-enlargement-in-the-eu/ (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Duff, A. (2022). Constitutional Change in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dunai, M., & Dubois, L. (2024). Romania and Bulgaria to join EU’s Schengen free movement area. Financial Times. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/5440a9dc-9605-4eee-8ad4-fbff707b2fa7 (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
EUR-Lex. (2022). Democratic deficit. Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/democratic-deficit.html (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Foy, H., Tamma, P. & Dunai, M. (2024). EU seeks to insulate itself from Viktor Orbán’s vetoes. Financial Times. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/dd8bf887-cc60-4a2a-8ae6-9c56eb8f5285 (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Hancock, A., Jopson, B., & Bounds, A. (2024). Far Right Gains Traction in EU Assembly. Financial Times. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/58771a68-8177-4818-89ca-7fc8fdcf3a4c (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Hollander, S. (2024). Ready, set, go? How to Prepare EU Democracy for Enlargement. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. Available at: https://www.clingendael.org/publication/ready-set-go-how-prepare-eu-democracy-enlargement (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Katsanidou, A. (2025). Stock-taking of the 2024 European Parliament Elections. Directorate-General for Citizens’ Rights, Justice and Institutional Affairs.
Koppa, M. (2022). A Southern Perspective on EU Enlargement. Future of Europe Blog. Available at: https://futureofeurope.ideasoneurope.eu/2022/08/11/a-southern-perspective-on-eu-enlargement/ (Accessed: 15/05/2025).
Mentzelopoulou, M. (2025). Demographic changes and labour migration within the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service
Micolta Portocarrero, M.C. (2014). The legislative process in the Lisbon Treaty: Privileging efficiency to the detriment of democracy. Papel Político, 19(1), pp. 265–301.
Oleart, A. & Theuns, T. (2022). ‘Democracy without Politics’ in the European Commission's Response to Democratic Backsliding: From Technocratic Legalism to Democratic Pluralism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(4).
Poptcheva, E.M. (2014). Role and Election of the President of the European Commission. Members’ Research Service.
Retter, L., Pezard, S., Flanagan, S., Germanovich, G., Grand Clement, S. & Paille, P. (2021). European Strategic Autonomy in Defence: Transatlantic Visions and Implications for NATO, US and EU Relations. RAND Europe.
Stefanou, K. (2020). The Governance System of the European Union. Athens: Legal Library (In Greek).
Toygür, I., Tekin, F., Lecha, E. S. I., & Danforth, N. (2022). Turkey’s Foreign Policy and its Consequences for the EU: In-depth Analysis. Directorate General for External Policies of the Union.