The Suffering Extremists: Political Behaviour, Civic vs. Party Engagement and Cardiovascular Health from the European Social Survey


Published: Dec 31, 2025
Keywords:
Political orientation Political participation Health outcomes European Social Survey Civic engagement Public health
Håkan Lane
Huda Mirdan
Michal Valko
Abstract

Using data from the European Social Survey and applying a range of statistical techniques, this policy brief examines how political orientation and modes of political engagement relate to health outcomes across Europe. The analysis reveals a consistent pattern: individuals positioned at either extreme of the ideological spectrum report poorer health and more unhealthy behaviors, whereas those identifying at the center or moderate left exhibit the most favorable health profiles. Beyond ideology, the form of political participation also matters. Engagement in non‑party political activities, such as civic initiatives or issue‑based actions, is associated with better health outcomes, while participation tied directly to political parties correlates with less advantageous health indicators. Patterns of participation differ across the spectrum: respondents on the left are more active in both party and non‑party politics, centrists participate minimally, and those on the right tend to engage more selectively in party‑related activities. Together, these findings highlight the complex interplay between political identity, modes of engagement, and public health, offering insights for policymakers seeking to strengthen civic life while promoting population well‑being.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Backhaus, I., Kino, S., La Torre, G., & Kawachi, I. (2019). Right-wing populism and self-rated health in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 73(12), 1116–1121. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211995
Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Pachucki, M. C. (2019). Impacts of adolescent and young adult civic engagement on health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Child Development, 90(4), 1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12998
Bambra, C. (2011). Health inequalities and welfare state regimes: Theoretical insights on a public health “puzzle”. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(9), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2011.136333
Baum, F. (2011). The new public health (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Baute, S. (2025). Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy. Social Science & Medicine, 374, 117946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117946
Breyer, B. (2015). Left–right self-placement (ALLBUS). ZIS – GESIS. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis83
Carmines, E. G., & D’Amico, N. J. (2015). The new look in political ideology research. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060314-115422
Gere, D., Kollár, D., & Stefkovics, Á. (2025). Who's left, who's right? Examining cross-national variations in the use of the left–right scale with anchoring vignettes. Comparative European Politics, 23(4), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-025-00414-x
Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28(10), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.004
Huijts, T., Perkins, J. M., & Subramanian, S. V. (2010). Political regimes, political ideology, and self-rated health in Europe: A multilevel analysis. PLOS ONE, 5(7), e11711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011711
Jennings, M. K., & Stoker, L. (2004). Social trust and civic engagement across time and generations. Acta Politica, 39(4), 342–379. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500077
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2000). Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 174–190). Oxford University Press.
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
Kim, D., & Kawachi, I. (2006). A multilevel analysis of key forms of community- and individual-level social capital as predictors of self-rated health in the United States. Journal of Urban Health, 83(5), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9082-1
Kroh, M., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Political attitudes and political participation. In S. Immerfall & G. Therborn (Eds.), Handbook of European societies (pp. 521–553). Springer.
Marmot, M. (2015). The health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mutz, D. C. (2015). In‑your‑face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton University Press.
Navarro, V., Muntaner, C., Borrell, C., Benach, J., Quiroga, A., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., & Pasarín, M. I. (2006). Politics and health outcomes. The Lancet, 368(9540), 1033–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69341-0
Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). Income inequality, perceived happiness, and self-rated health: Evidence from nationwide surveys in Japan. Social Science & Medicine, 70(9), 1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.010
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00821.x
Subramanian, S. V., & Kawachi, I. (2004). Income inequality and health: What have we learned so far? Epidemiologic Reviews, 26(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxh003
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7
Warode, L. (2025). Mapping left–right associations: A framework using open-ended survey responses and political positions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1318. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05679-x