A non-invasive manual method for the assessment of pregnancy in female Scyliorhinus canicula catsharks


Published: May 30, 2018
Keywords:
Scyliorhinus stellaris shark conservation sustainable fishery
MERCEDES HOF
RENATE I. DAHLKE
THOMAS DANDEKAR
MARTIN KALTDORF
LOTHAR A. BECK
Abstract

Enhanced survival of oviparous shark populations can rely on only one easily applicable method. We tested a powerful method to retrieve egg cases from dead oviparous females at the fish market which is non-invasive. We approved this method for Scyliorhinus canicula and Scyliorhinus stellaris (smallspotted catshark and Nursehound) in Valletta, Malta in 2014. Here, catsharks are landed in whole, whereas in many other Mediterranean countries sharks are already eviscerated when brought ashore. Saving egg cases bears the grateful opportunity to rescue shark embryos and this then helps again to restore fish stocks. The common work flow of fishermen is to throw away the egg cases when eviscerating the shark and so the embryos were left in the bin to die. To apply a non-invasive method is very important at fish markets where sharks are landed in one piece as fish brokers do not tolerate many dissections. So, our goal was to detect pregnant females with maximum accuracy and dissect only females with egg cases inside. Formerly, the common method used by members of Sharklab-Malta was to dissect females more or less randomly based on only two parameters (i) a total length above 40cm and (ii) a relatively corpulent body shape. This was not effective as many females were dissected without containing egg cases. This led to the more problematic fact that pregnant individuals were not found and so their offspring died in the end. The basic concept in our newly tested method is based on using a fixed touching pattern which allows to screen the belly of all females available simply by hand. To screen one female only 2 seconds are needed, and this works surprisingly well. We called this method “gotIt” simply because we got all available egg cases and could save all embryos. A validation underpinned the success and showed that gotIt works with 100% accuracy. After rescuing the egg cases they were transported to an aquarium. Egg cases were attached to a lanyard by their tendrils and left for development in the tank for 3-6 months (depending on their initial developmental stage at the fish market) at a water temperature of 15-19°C. After hatching, sharks were fed with squid and released into the sea. The number of rescued embryos arose significantly from five to above hundreds of shark pups which were saved and released by applying gotIt. Additionally, fishermen can be encouraged to use this method, as awareness programs can be promoted to encourage consumption of this sustainable fish, which can therefore increase the marketable prices. Widely applied, gotIt can help to preserve oviparous shark populations at fish markets where sharks are landed whole.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Article
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
MERCEDES HOF, University of Würzburg
Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter
RENATE I. DAHLKE, Philipps-University Marburg
Plant Physiology and Photobiology, Faculty of Biology
THOMAS DANDEKAR, University of Würzburg
Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter
MARTIN KALTDORF, University of Würzburg
Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter
LOTHAR A. BECK, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
Department of Animal Evolution and Systematics
References
Angilletta, Jr, M.J., Dunham, A.E., 2003. The Temperature-Size Rule in Ectotherms: Simple Evolutionary Explanations May Not Be General. The American Naturalist, 162 (3), 332-342.
Baum, J.K., 2003. Collapse and Conservation of Shark Populations in the Northwest Atlantic. Science, 299 (5605), 389-392, doi:10.1126/science.1079777.
Bowmaker, J.K., 2008. Evolution of Vertebrate Visual Pigments. Vision Research, 48 (20), 2022-2041, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.025.
Carey, G.F., Teal, M.J., 1969. Mako and Porbeagle: Warm-Bodied Sharks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 28 (1), 199-204.
Daves, N.K., Nammack, M.F., 1998. US and International Mechanisms for Protecting and Managing Shark Resources. Fisheries Research, 39, 223-228.
Ellis, J.R., Shackley, S.E., 1997. The Reproductive Biology of Scyliorhinus Canicula in the Bristol Channel, U.K. Journal of Fish Biology, 51 (2), 361-372, doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01672.x.
Ferretti, F., Myers, R.A., Serena, F., Lotze, H.K., 2008. Loss of Large Predatory Sharks from the Mediterranean Sea. Conservation Biology, 22 (4), doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00938.x
Filiz, H., Taskavak, E., 2006. Sexual Dimorphism in the Head, Mouth, and Body Morphology of the Smallspotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus Canicula (Linnaeus, 1758) (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) from Turkey. Acta Adriatica, 47 (1), 37-47.
Friedlander, A.M., DeMartini, E.E., 2002. Contrasts in Density, Size, and Biomass of Reef Fishes between the Northwestern and the Main Hawaiian Islands: The Effects of Fishing down Apex Predators. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 230, 253-264.
Graham N.A.J., Spalding, M.D., Sheppard, C.R.C., 2010. Reef shark decline in remote atolls highlight the need for multi-faceted conservation action. Aquatic conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosysems, 20 (5), 543-548, doi:10.1002/aqc.1116.
Ivory, P., Jeal, F., Nolan, C.P., 2004. Age Determination, Growth and Reproduction in the Lesser-Spotted Dogfish, Scyliorhinus Canicula (L.). Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 37, 89–106, doi:10.2960/J.v35.m504.
Lingham-Soliar, T., 2016. Convergence in Thunniform Anatomy in Lamnid Sharks and Jurassic Ichthyosaurs. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56 (6), 1323-1336, doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw125.
Owen, D., 2009. Sharks: In Peril in the Sea. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, 248.
Stevens, J.D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N.K., Walker, P.A., 2000. The Effects of Fishing on Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyans), and the Implications for Marine Ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57 (3), 476-494, doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724.
Tsikliras, A.C., Stergiou, K.I., 2014. Size at Maturity of Mediterranean Marine Fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 24 (1), 219-268, doi:10.1007/s11160-013-9330-x.
Ward- Paige, C.A., Mora, C., Lotze, H.K., Pattengill-Semmens, C., McClenachan, L., Arias-Castro, E. et al., 2010. Large-Scale Absence of Sharks on Reefs in the Greater-Caribbean: A Footprint of Human Pressures. Plos One, 5 (8), e11968, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011968.
Worm, B., Davis, B., Kettemer, L., Ward-Paige, C.A., Chapman, D. et al., 2013. Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Marine Policy, 40, 194-204, doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034.