The views of educators on the utilisation of information and communication technologies in controlled educational environments: The example of therapeutic communities

Homo Virtualis Journal, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2024.
PDF
Published: Dec 24, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.39831
Keywords:
Therapeutic communities information and communication technologies educators correctional facilities
Aikaterini Ntaflou
Department of Sociology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2658-1259
Konstantinos Malafantis
Department of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Abstract

Reintegration of individuals into the community constitutes an official strategic aim for correctional facilities. It methodically addresses the factors that contribute to the recurrence of delinquent behaviour while simultaneously reinforcing those that will aid in the stability of this integration. From this perspective, incarcerated individuals need to be educated on how society and the state operate. A crucial part of this education, not as a privilege but as a necessity for reintegration into a world where technological advancements affect the structure and functions of social systems, is familiarisation with Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). For this reason, educators who undertake the task of educating delinquent individuals have an exceptionally challenging job. They strive to prepare individuals who are already disadvantaged in various aspects of their lives for their return to society, in highly restrictive environments, both in terms of educational and technological infrastructure. This research is part of a postdoctoral study on education and reintegration. It focuses on the views of educators who teach in therapeutic reintegration communities regarding utilising information and communication technologies in the education provided in these structures. The method of interviews was used with a total of 8 educators teaching in therapeutic communities in Greece.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alkhudiry, R., & Alahdal, A. (2021). The Role of Online Learning During and Post COVID19: A Case of Psycho-Social Study. TESOL International Journal, 16(1), 119–138
Altun, T., Akyıldız, S., Gülay, A., & Caner Ö. (2021). Investigating Education Faculty Students’ Views about Asynchronous Distance Education Practices during COVID-19 Isolation Period. 10(1), 34–35
Andrews, D.A. & Bonta, J. (2003). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Armstrong, M. (2020). Moving classes online is hard, especially in prisons. Retrieved from https://slate.com/technology/2020/05/remote-learning-prisons.html
Barkworth, J., Thaler, O., & Howard, M. (2023). Implementing digital technologies in prisons: Inmate uptake and perceived value of in-cell digital tablets. NSW Government.
Bonk, C.J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4), 589-599
Borzycki, M. (2005). Interventions for Prisoners Returning to the Community. A Report Prepared by the Australian Institute of Criminology for the Community Safety and Justice Branch of the Australian Government Attorney General's Department. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Brazzell, Br.D. (2007). Informing and Engaging Communities through Reentry Mapping. Washington (D.C.): Justice Police Center, Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311411_Informing_and_Engaging.pdf
Burrows, K., Clarke, A., Davidson, T., Tarling, R & Webb, S. (2001). Research into the Nature and Effectiveness of Drug Throughcare (PDF Version), Occasional paper, no. 68. London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
Champion, N. & Edgar, K. (2016). Through The Gateway: How Computers Can Transform Rehabilitation. London. Prisoners Education Trust- Prison Reform Trust
Çoban, M., & Goksu, İ. (2022). Using virtual reality learning environments to motivate and socialize undergraduates in distance learning. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 199–218.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MISQ 13(3), 319-340.
De Leon, G. (1994). The therapeutic community: Toward a general theory and model. In Therapeutic Community: Advances in Research and Application (NIDA Research Monograph 144), edited by F. M. Timms, G. De Leon and N. Jainchill, 16–55. Washington DC: US DHHS, (Module 3 Handout Pack – Papers: M3-i).
Devi, A. & McGarry, A. (2013). Online Pedagogy: reaching out to hard-to-reach learners, Journal of Assistive Technologies, 7(1).
Finn, M.A. & Muirhead-Steves, S. (2002). The Effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring with Violent Male Parolees. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 293-312.
Grant, B.A., Kunic, D., MacPherson, P., McKeown, C., Hansen, E. (2004). The high intensity substance abuse program (HISP): Results from the pilot program (Research Report R-140). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada.
Griffiths, C.T. (2004). Canadian Corrections. 2nd edition. Toronto: Thomson Nelson.
Harper, G. & Chitty, C. (2004). The Impact of Corrections on Re-offending: A Review of 'What Works'. (PDF Version) Third edition. London, UK: Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
Harrington, R. & Bailey, S. (2005). Mental Health Needs and Effectiveness of Provision for Young Offenders in Custody and in the Community (PDF Version). London, UK: Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.
Hartwell, S.W. & Orr, K. (1999). The Massachusetts Forensic Transition Program for Mentally Ill Offenders Re-Entering the Community. Psychiatric Services, 50(9), 1220-1222.
Hopkins, S., Farley, H. (2014). A prisoners’ island: teaching. Australian incarcerated students in the digital age. J Prison Educ Reentry 1(1), 42-51.
Hrastinski, S., Keller, C., & Carlsson, S.A. (2010). Design exemplars for synchronous elearning: A design theory approach. Computers and Education, 55(2), 652–662
Kerr, A., & Willis, M. (2018). Prisoner use of information and communications technology. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice [electronic resource], (560), 1-19.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A. & Larsen, K.R.T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 12(50).
Maguire, M. & Raynor, P. (1997). The revival of throughcare: Rhetoric and Reality in Automatic Conditional Release. The British Journal of Criminology. 37(1). (Winter), pp. 1-14
Maruna, S. & LeBel, T. (2002). Revisiting Ex-prisoner Re-entry: A Buzzword in Search of a Narrative. in Rex, S. & Tonry, M. (eds), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing, Portland: Willan Publishing. 158-180.
McDougall, C., Pearson, DAS., Torgerson, DJ, et al. (2017). The effect of digital technology on prisoner behavior and reoffending: A natural stepped-wedge design. Journal of Experimental Criminology 13(4): 455–482.
McHugh, Siobhàn. (2022). 9 Inclusion, diversity and equality: Pushing the boundaries of podcasting. The Power of Podcasting: Telling Stories Through Sound, New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press, pp. 216-249
Motiuk, L.L., Belcourt R.L. & Bonta, J. (1995). Managing High-Risk Offenders: A Post-Detention Follow-up. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Mufarreh, A., Waitkus, J., & Booker, T.A. (2022). Prison official perceptions of technology in prison. Punishment & Society, 24(3), 410–432
Mullen, R., Arbiter, N., Plepler, C. & Bond, D. (2019). In-prison therapeutic communities in California. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 40(3/4), 142-158. (Module 6 Handout Pack – Papers: M6-v)
NHMRC. National statement on ethical conduct in human research (2007). Canberra: NHMRC; (2018). <https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018>.
Paparozzi, M.A. & Gendreau, P. (2005). An Intensive Supervision Program that Worked: Service Delivery, Professional Orientation, and Organizational Supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85(4), 445-466.
Prochaska, J.O., Norcross, J.C., & DiClemente, C.C. (1994). Changing for good: A revolutionary six-stage program for overcoming bad habits and moving your life positively forward. New York, NY: Avon Books.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Post digital Science and Education, (2), 923–945
Sogunro, O.A. (2015). Motivating Factors for Adult Learners in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 22-38
Stöver, H. & Thane, K. (2011). Towards a continuum of care in the EU criminal justice system: a survey of prisoners’ needs in four countries (Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/
Talbot, D. (2015). the importance of qualitative research and the problem of mass data gathering. Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-qualitativeresearch-problem-mass-data-gathering-talbot/
Tarling, R., Davison, T., & Clarke, A. (2004). The National Evaluation of the Youth Justice Boards' Mentoring Projects. London, UK: Youth Justice Board.
Tichavsky, L.P., Hunt, A.N., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). It's Just Nice Having a Real Teacher: Student Perceptions of Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2).
Tinker, R.F., & Xie, Q. (2008). Applying computational science to education: the molecular workbench paradigm. Computing in Science & Engineering, 10(5), 24–27.
Torres, A. (2017). The Event Technology Attendees Will Take for Granted in 5 Years. Eventbrite Blog. Retrieved from: https://www.eventbrite.com/blog/event-technology-ds00/
Travis, J. (2000). But They All Come Back: Rethinking Prisoner Re-entry (PDF Version). Sentencing and Corrections, No. 7, Washington (D.C.): National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
Travis, J., Solomon, A.L., & Waul, M. (2001). From Prison to Home: The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Re-entry (PDF Version). Washington, D.C.: Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.
Wigfield, A., & Wentzel, K.R. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 191–196
Wilson, R., Stewart, L., Stirpe, T., Barrett, M., & Cripps, J.E. (2000). Community-based Sex Offender Management: Combining Parole Supervision and Treatment to Reduce Recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 177-188.
Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students' motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930
Yates, R. (2011). Therapeutic communities: can do thinking for must have recovery. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery 6(1/2), 101-116. (Module 1 Handout Pack – Papers: M1-ii).
Yates, R. (2011). The Manual. London: Phoenix Futures,
Yates, R. (2015). Recovery capital, addiction theory and the development of recovery communities. Addicta 1(2), 96-112.
Zacharia, Z.C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 120–132.
Zoukis, C. (2016). Technology boosts prison education. Zoukis Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://www.prisonerresource.com/education/technology-boosts-prison-education/