Industry 4.0 and the digitalisation of society: Curse or cure?

PDF (English)
Veröffentlicht: Σεπ 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.18622
Charalambos Tsekeris
Researcher, National Centre for Social Research, Athens, Greece
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-5331
Abstract
The central aim of this article is to sketch and outline a brief and critical presentation, overview and assessment of the (radically ambivalent) dynamics of the large family of technological developments pertaining to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0), as well as of the so-called digitalisation of society. This assessment attempts to comprehensively overcome relevant analytical dualisms and the one-sided “either-or” logic, in favor of a synthetic, open and creative “both-and” framework of interdisciplinary thought.
Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Articles
Creative-Commons-Lizenz
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Literaturhinweise
Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brin, D. (1998). Transparent society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). Second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Demertzis, N., & Tsekeris, C. (2018). Multifaceted European public sphere: Socio-cultural dynamics (Media@LSE Working Paper Series, No 51). London: Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Dimitrov, A. (2015). Ecology of virtual realities. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Cri-tique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 13 (1), 136-143.
Fuchs, C. (2015). Culture and economy in the Age of Social Media. New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2018). Industry 4.0: The Digital German Ideology. tripleC: Communication, Capital-ism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16 (1), 280-289.
Garibaldo, F., & Rebecchi, E. (2018) Cyber-physical system. AI & Society, 33 (3), 299-311.
Greene, D. M., & Joseph, D. (2015). The digital spatial fix. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 13 (2), 223-247.
Helbing, D. (2015). The automation of society is next: How to survive the digital revolution. Zürich: ResearchGate.
Helbing, D. (2017). From remote-controlled to self-controlled citizens. The European Physi-cal Journal Special Topics, 226 (2), 313-320.
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2016). “Industry 4.0” as promising technology: Emergence, semantics and ambivalent character (Soziologisches Arbeitspapier Nr. 48). Dortmund: Universi-tätsbibliothek Dortmund.
Kitchin, R. (2014). Short presentation on the need for critical data studies. The programma-ble city blog. Retrieved 23 April 2018 from: http://www.nuim.ie/prog-city/2014/04/short-presentation-on-the-need-for-critical-data-studies/
Koskinas, K. (2018). Editorial: Homo Virtualis Inaugural Issue. Homo Virtualis, 1 (1), 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/homvir.18621
Kucklick, C. (2014). Die granulare gesellschaft: Auf dem weg ins zeitalter der ungleichheit. Berlin: Ullstein Buchverlage.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1 (2), 1-13.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Mosco, V. (2015). To the cloud: Big data in a turbulent world. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Books.
Mosco, V. (2017). Becoming digital: Toward a post‐internet society. Bingley: Emerald.
Pfeiffer, S. (2017). The vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the making – a case of future told, tamed, and traded. NanoEthics, 11 (1), 107-121.
Prisecaru, P. (2016). Challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Knowledge Horizons. Economics, 8 (1), 57-62.
Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The Internet of Things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Schumpeter, J. (2003/1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Routledge.
Schwab, K. (2016a). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum blog, January 14, 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2018 from: www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond
Schwab, K. (2016b). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Swan, M. (2017). Is technological unemployment real? An assessment and a plea for abundance economics. In K. LaGrandeur & J. Hughes (Eds), Surviving the Machine Age (pp. 19-33). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsekeris, C. (2016). Reflections on a Critical Sociology of Networks. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 14 (2), 397-412.
Tsekeris, C., & Koskinas, K. (2011). General reflections on virtual communities research. China Media Research, 7 (1), 39-48.
Tsekeris, T., Tsekeris, C., & Katerelos, I. (2018). Reflections on networks, human behaviour, and social dynamics in the digital age. AI & Society, 33 (2), 253-260.
van Lier, B. (2017). Can cyber‐physical systems reliably collaborate within a blockchain? Metaphilosophy, 48 (5), 698-711.
Wadhwa, V. (2016). 6 big ways tech is rewriting society’s rules. Retrieved 21 April 2018 from: https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/16/6-big-ways-tech-is-rewriting-societys-rules/
Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in