Social Robots: The case of Robot Sophia

PDF (English)
Δημοσιευμένα: May 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.30320
Nikolaos Kouravanas
Andreas Pavlopoulos
Περίληψη

In recent years there has been an increasing use of robots in various areas of public and private life. This leads to a set of ethical, social and interpersonal dilemmas. The subject of this paper concerns attitudes towards social robots, starting with the issue of citizenship and moving on to the roles that can be attributed to a robot with Artificial Intelligence. A central example was the social robot Sophia, which has artificial intelligence, and it has been given to it a citizenship. In order to investigate the issue, a literature review of previous research articles related to social robots was initially conducted. An attitudes’ questionnaire was then constructed, to which 137 participants answered. The results showed that, the majority of the sample did not want robots to acquire citizenship and equal rights as humans, nor did they want robots to be used for roles involved in interpersonal relationships, such as raising children, work, friendship, or love. In general, it has been observed that the research sample was not particularly prepared for the existence of social robots in society, while they have been associated with negative or malicious purposes. Gender and age also play an important role regarding attitudes towards social robots. However, this is an open issue that leaves much more unanswered questions and concerns.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Έρευνες προπτυχιακών φοιτητών
Creative Commons License

Αυτή η εργασία είναι αδειοδοτημένη υπό το CC Αναφορά Δημιουργού 4.0.

Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους, δίνοντας στο περιοδικό το δικαίωμα της πρώτης δημοσίευσης.

Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στο περιοδικό διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς.

Οι συγγραφείς μπορούν να καταθέσουν το άρθρο σε ιδρυματικό ή άλλο αποθετήριο ή/και να το δημοσιεύσουν σε άλλη έκδοση, με υποχρεωτική την αναφορά πρώτης δημοσίευσης στο περιοδικό

Οι συγγραφείς ενθαρρύνονται να καταθέσουν σε αποθετήριο ή να δημοσιεύσουν την εργασία τους στο διαδίκτυο πριν ή κατά τη διαδικασία υποβολής και αξιολόγησής της.

Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Brooks, R.A., Breazeal, C. Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B., & Williamson, M.M. (1998). The Cog Project: Building a humanoid robot. In C.L. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents (pp. 52-87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48834-0_5.
Chen, J.Y.C. (2010). UAV- guided navigation for ground robot tele-operation in a military reconnaissance environment. Ergonomics, 53, 940-950. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2010.500404.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Robot rights? Towards a social- relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9235-5.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Can we trust robots? Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9279-1.
Colombo, S., Lim, Y., Alonso, M.B., et al. (2019, October 9-11). Design and Semantics of Form and Movement. DeSForM 2019. Beyond Intelligence. https://www.google.gr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjjipqFyq_0AhWSzaQKHYiACEEQFnoECAYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.pubpub.org%2F64l7tv68%2F31573864479637.pdf&usg=AOvVaw28ZrPbDkzGbP6jQ3Z7kdYK.
Cook, D., Vardy, A., & Lewis, R. (2014, October 6-9). A survey of AUV and robot simulators for multi- vehicle operations. 2014 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2014.7054411.
Davou, M. (2008). Introduction. In A.J. Gordo-Lopez & I. Parker (Eds), Cyberpsychology (pp. 21-29). Papazisi.
Deacon, G., Harwood, A., Holdbak, J., et al. (2009). The Pathfinder image- guided surgical robot. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 224(5), 691-713. https://doi.org/10.1243%2F09544119JEIM617.
Forlano, L. (2017). Posthumanism and Design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.08.001.
Freedman, D.H. (1994, January 12). Brining up RoboBaby. https://www.wired.com/1994/12/cog/.
Gasparetto, A., & Scalera, L. (2019). From the Unimate to the Delta Robot: The Early Decades of Industrial Robotics. In B. Zhang & M. Ceccarelli (Eds), Explorations in the History and Heritage of Machines and Mechanisms (pp. 284-295). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03538-9_23.
Georgouli, K. (2015). Artificial Intelligence. An introductory approach. Association of Greek Academic Libraries, National Technical University of Athens.
Graham, I. (2004). Τεχνητή νοημοσύνη. Σαββάλας.
Hein, M., & Nathan- Roberts, D. (2018). Socially interactive robots can teach young students language skills: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1083-1087. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541931218621249.
Krageloh, C.U., Bharatharaj, J., Kutty, S.K.S., Nirmala, P.R., & Huang, L. (2019). Questionnaires to measure acceptability of social robots: A critical review. Robotics, 8, 88-102. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics8040088.
Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2014). Animals and the frontiers of citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001.
Levy, D. (2009). Love and sex with robots. Harper Collins.
Levy, D. (2016). Why not marry a robot? International Conference on Love and Sex with Robots. In A.D. Cheok, K. Devlin & D. Levy (Eds.), Love and Sex with Robots (pp. 3-13). LSR 2016. Springer. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57738-8_1.
Loebner, H. (2007, June 15). Robot prostitutes as alternatives to human sex workers. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Robot-Prostitutes-as-Alternatives-to-Human-Sex-Loebner/5eaa70aa9ec92d2abe26c8430a067c8b6dfd76f0.
Lupetti, M.L., Bendor, R., & Giaccardi, E. (2019). Robot citizenship: A design perspective. In S. Colombo et al. (Eds), Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (87-95). DeSforM 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336464420_Robot_Citizenship_A_Design_Perspective.
Lupetti, M.L., & Cila, N. (2019, October). Envisioning and questioning near future urban robotics. In S. Colombo et al. (Eds), Design and Semantics of Form and Movement. Conference: Desform 2019. https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/envisioning-and-questioning-near-future-urban-robotics.
Marx, J., & Tiefensee, C. (2015). Of animals, robots and men. Historical Social Research, 40 (4), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.4.70-91.
Operto, S. (2019). Evaluating public opinion towards robots: A mixed- method approach. Paladyn. Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10, 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0023.
Oxford Dictionary. (2021, May 25). Artificial Intelligence. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/artificial intelligence.
Rocha, E. (2018). Sophia: Exploring the ways al may change intellectual property protections. DePaul of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 28(2), 126-146. https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol28/iss2/3?utm_source=via.library.depaul.edu%2Fjatip%2Fvol28%2Fiss2%2F3&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
Pagallo, U. (2018). Vital, Sophia, and Co. –The quest for the legal personhood of robots. Information, 9, 230- 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9090230.
Pfeifer, A., & Lugrin, B. (2018). Female robots as role-models? - The influence of robot gender and learning materials on learning success. In C. Penstein Rosé, et al. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 10948, (Cham: Springer), 276–280. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_51.
Rifkin, J. (2001). Η νέα εποχή της πρόσβασης. Η νέα κουλτούρα του υπερκαπιταλισμού, όπου όλη η ζωή είναι μια επί πληρωμή εμπειρία. Λιβάνη.
Rosenberg- Kima, R.B., Koren, Y., & Gordon, G. (2020). Robot-Supported Collaborative Learning (RSCL): Social Robots as Teaching Assistants for Higher Education Small Group Facilitation. Frontiers in Robotics and Al, 6, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00148.
Roth, J. (2006). Complexity theory and cryptology. An introduction to cryptocomplexity. Springer
Ryznar, M. (2019). Robot Love. Seton Hall Law Review, 49, 353-374. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3235187.
Saplacan, D., & Herstad, J. (2019, August 19-22). Understanding robot motion in domestic setting. 2019 Joint IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2019.8850695.
SAS Global Forum. (2021, June 22). Τεχνητή Νοημοσύνη. Τι είναι η ΤΝ και γιατί έχει σημασία. https://www.sas.com/el_gr/insights/analytics/what-is-artificial-intelligence.html.
Scaccellati, B., Boccanfuso, L., Huan, C.M., et al. (2018). Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long- term, in- home social robot. Science Robotics, 3 (21), 7544. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat7544.
Spencer, E.H. (1996). The ROBODOC clinical trial: A robotic assistant for total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic Nursing, 15(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345302.
Staritz, P.J., Skaff, S., Urmson, C., & Whittaker, W. (2001, May 21-26). Skyworker: A robot for assembly, inspection and maintenance of large scale orbital facilities. Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2001.933271.
Tassis, Th. (2019). Digital humanism, pictorial subject and artificial intelligence. Armos.
Vysin, M., & Knoclicek, R. (2003, December 10-12). The hybrid mobile robot. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2003.1290291.
Wei, W., & Fei, G. (2020, October). Design of Pathfinder Robot. ICCPR 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition, 2020, 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1145/3436369.3436460.