Exploring gender-based violence through creative psychosocial interventions: A qualitative study
Abstract
This article aims to explore lived experiences related to gender-based violence through the lens of ambivalent and internalized sexism, taking into account the psychosocial dimensions of the phenomenon. Adopting a phenomenological qualitative approach, the study focuses on how individuals internalize and perpetuate gender stereotypes and ambivalent social attitudes, thereby normalizing forms of violence that often remain invisible or unacknowledged. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews supported by multimodal tools such as Dixit cards, drawings, and narrative techniques that encouraged emotional expression and reflexive dialogue. The research involved ten individual interviews with women, conducted in familiar settings to promote safety and openness. The findings revealed that participants experience sexism as an ongoing, persistent part of daily life, expressed across multiple social contexts. Everyday sexism, through small yet recurrent practices, serves as a constant reminder of the gender hierarchies that structure daily existence. Internalized sexism leads women to conform to social expectations to gain acceptance, while ambivalent sexism generates confusion by combining seemingly positive expressions with underlying inequalities. Feminism emerged as a significant concept; however, participants often avoided explicitly identifying with it due to its negative connotations and the criticism directed at those who embrace it. Overall, the findings suggest that women struggle to shed internalized stereotypes, experiencing a constant tension between their desire for empowerment and the social pressures that seek to restrict their autonomy.
Article Details
- Come citare
-
Mouratidi, M. Z. (2025). Exploring gender-based violence through creative psychosocial interventions: A qualitative study. Homo Virtualis, 8(2), 331–374. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.43495
- Sezione
- Articles
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002 (Original work published 1990)
Allport, G. W. (1985). The nature of prejudice (Nachdr.). Addison-Wesley.
Bareket, O., & Fiske, S. T. (2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11–12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400
Barreto, Manuela & Ellemers, Naomi & Piebinga, Laura & Moya, Miguel. (2010). How Nice of Us and How Dumb of Me: The Effect of Exposure to Benevolent Sexism on Women’s Task and Relational Self-Descriptions. Sex Roles. 62. 532-544. 10.1007/s11199-009-9699-0.
Bartky, S.L. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. Routledge
Bates, L. (2014). Everyday Sexism: The Project that Inspired a Worldwide Movement. Thomas Dunne Books / St. Martin’s Press.
Beneke, T. (1982). Men on rape. St. Martin’s Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Brailas, A. (2020). Using drawings in qualitative interviews: An introduction to the practice. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4585
Brailas, A. (2025a). Replication crisis in psychology, second-order cybernetics, and transactional causality: From experimental psychology to applied psychological practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 59(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09867-3
Brailas, A. (2025b). The appreciative qualitative interview: A research method for empowering people. Methodology, 21(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.15421
Brailas, A., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Systems thinking, rhizomes, and community-based qualitative research. Στο E. Tseliou, C. Demuth, E. Georgaca, & B. Gough, The Routledge International Handbook of Innovative Qualitative Psychological Research (1η έκδ., σελ. 304–319). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003132721-28
Brailas, A., Tragou, E., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Introduction to qualitative data analysis and coding with qualcoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13230
Bearman, S., Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1(1), 10–47.
Buschman, J., & Lenart, L. (1996). ‘I Am Not a Feminist, but...’: College Women, Feminism, and Negative Experience. International Society of Political Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 59-75 (17 pages). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3791943
Carr, E. R., Szymanski, D. M., Taha, F., West, L. M., & Kaslow, N. J. (2014). Understanding the link between multiple oppressions and depression among african american women: The role of internalization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313499900
Chesler, P. (2001). Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman. Thunder’s Mouth Press / Nation Books.
Cooley, C. H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Polity Press
Cortina, Lilia & Berdahl, Jennifer. (2008). Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Decade of Research in Review. Handbook of organizational behavior. 10.4135/9781849200448.n26.
Cowan, G. (2000). Critical examination of victim-feminism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(3), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/036168430002400304
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Ehrhardt, U. (2010). Τα καλά κορίτσια πάνε στον παράδεισο, τα κακά πάνε παντού. Γιατί η καλοσύνη δεν μας βοηθάει και πολύ στη ζωή μας. Εκδόσεις Καστανιώτη.
Findlay, Bruce & Piggott, M. (2005). Double jeopardy: Lesbians and the legacy of multiple stigmatised identities. Australian Journal of Psychology. 57. 85-85.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357–411). McGraw-Hill.
Fitzgerald, Louise & Gelfand, Michele & Drasgow, Fritz. (1995). Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric Advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology - BASIC APPL SOC PSYCHOL. 17. 425-445. 10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.3.h76250x720j43175
Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’ to # MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718794647
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Academic Press.
Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social cost of rape. Free Press.
Hammond, M. D., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416686213
Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press.
Hurst, A. (2023). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. Oregon State University. https://open.oregonstate.education/qualresearchmethods/
Jack, D. C. (1991). Silencing the self: Women and depression. Harvard University Press.
Jackman, Mary R. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1994 1994. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft958009k3/
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
Kaschak, Ellyn. (1992). Engendered Lives: A New Psycology of Women's Experience.
Klonoff, E. A., Landrine, H., & Campbell, R. (2000). Sexist discrimination may account for well-known gender differences in psychiatric symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01025.x
Laura Mulvey, (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Screen, Volume 16, Issue 3, Autumn 1975, Pages 6–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Loughnan, S., & Pacilli, M. G. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Toward a more complete mapping of sexual objectification. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(3), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.6
Mill, J. S. (1869). The subjection of women. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2343
Moya, Miguel & Glick, Peter & Expósito, Francisca & de Lemus, Soledad & Hart, Joshua. (2007). It's for Your Own Good: Benevolent Sexism and Women's Reactions to Protectively Justified Restrictions. Personality & social psychology bulletin. 33. 1421-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304790.
Moya, Paula M.L. (2002). Learning from Experience: Minority Identities, Multicultural Struggles. University of California Press.
Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
Rosenthal, N. B. (1984). Consciousness raising: From revolution to re-evaluation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8(4), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1984.tb00639.x
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The f word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x
Seligman, M. E. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 77(5), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029790
Sowards, S. K., & Renegar, V. R. (2004). The rhetorical functions of consciousness‐raising in third wave feminism. Communication Studies, 55(4), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388637
Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200
Szymanski, D. M., & Feltman, C. E. (2014). Experiencing and coping with sexually objectifying treatment: Internalization and resilience. Sex Roles, 71(3–4), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0392-6
Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Kameoka, V. A. (1986). Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and social desirability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.3.328
Ussher, Jane. (2011). The Madness of Women: Myth and Experience. 10.4324/9780203806579.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
Willig. (2015). Ποιοτικές μέθοδοι έρευνας στην ψυχολογία: Εισαγωγή. GUTENBERG.
Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “i’m not a feminist, but …”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x
Αμερικανική Ψυχολογική Εταιρεία. (2022). APA Οδηγός δημοσίευσης εργασιών – 7η Αμερικανική Έκδοση (Δ. Αλεξανδρή, Μετ., Χ. Κανάκη, Επιμ.). Εκδόσεις Gutenberg.
Χρυσοχόου Ξ., Ιατρίδης Τ. (2013). Όψεις της ηγεμονίας στις φιλελεύθερες κοινωνίες: Κοινωνιοψυχολογικές προσεγγίσεις της κοινωνικής αναπαραγωγής και μεταβολής. Εκδόσεις Πεδίο.
Κογγίδου, Δ. (2014, 12 Ιουνίου). Εκπαιδευτικό σύστημα και διακόσμηση της γυναικείας εκπαίδευσης. SocialPolicy.gr.
Κωνσταντινίδου Χ. (2007). Φεμινιστικές προσεγγίσεις των μέσων επικοινωνίας. Από την βεβαιότητα στη θεωρητική και μεθοδολογική αμηχανία. The Greek Review of Social Research, 123, 79–112. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.148
Λεονταρή, Α. (2011). Η σημασία της εικόνας του σώματος για την ψυχική υγεία. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 8(3), 309–337.
Λιότζης Ευ.,(2020). Η Ροζ Λογοτεχνία και τα Όριά της: Από το Παγκόσμιο στο Τοπικό και στο Εγχώριο Πεδίο, Σύγκριση/Comparaison/Comparison, τχ. 29
Λιότζης, Β. (2021). Σεξισμός Προσεγγίζοντας την επίμαχη αμφιθυμία (α. εκδ.). FUTURA.
Μιλ, Τ. Σ. (1983). Η αξία της γυναίκας (Μ. Λώμη, Μετφρ.). Γλάρος.
Μπράιλας, Α., Παπαχριστόπουλος, Κ., & Τράγου, Έ. (2023). Εισαγωγή στην ποιοτική ανάλυση δεδομένων με το λογισμικό taguette: Ζητήματα εγκυρότητας και αξιοπιστίας στην ποιοτική έρευνα. Ανοικτή Εκπαίδευση: το περιοδικό για την Ανοικτή και εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση και την Εκπαιδευτική Τεχνολογία, 19(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.26960
Παντελίδου Μαλούτα, Μ. (2014). Φύλο, Κοινωνία, Πολιτική: H Θεματική ενότητα εκπαιδευτικού υλικού. Αθήνα: Κέντρο Ερευνών για Θέματα Ισότητας (ΚΕΘΙ).
Τσοκαλίδου, Ρ. (2002). Γυναίκες, γλώσσα και λεξικά. Σε Ε. Γκόβα (επιμ.), Η πτώση των φύλ(λ)ων. Κείμενα προτάσεις για το σεξισμό και τη βία (σσ. 57 60). Αθήνα: Ελευθερία.
Χατζοπούλου, Κ. (2016, 9 Μαρτίου). Για την ημέρα της γυναίκας – Σεξισμός και σεξιστικός λόγος. ResPublica. https://www.respublica.gr/2016/03/post/sexism/
Φραγκουδάκη, Α. (1999). Γλώσσα και ιδεολογία. Κοινωνιολογική προσέγγιση της ελληνικής γλώσσας (8η ΕΚΔΟΣΗ). ΟΔΥΣΣΕΑΣ ΕΠΕ.
