| More

Morphometric evaluation of relevant radiographic parameters of the forefeet of clinically normal donkeys (Equus αsinus)

Views: 136 Downloads: 78
E. A. EL-SHAFAEY, M. G. SALEM, E. MOSBAH, A. E. ZAGHLOUL
E. A. EL-SHAFAEY, M. G. SALEM, E. MOSBAH, A. E. ZAGHLOUL

Abstract


This study provides a standard database of morphometric evaluation of the digital bone and hoof parameters of the forefeet of clinically normal donkeys using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) software programme, as a means to improve diagnosis and clinical decision-making regarding foot lameness in equine practice. Thirty orthopedically sound donkeys were included in this study. For each donkey forefoot, lateromedial (LM) and dorsopalmar (DP) radiographs were obtained with the foot in a vertical position. A total of 26 digital bone and hoof parameters obtained from the LM and DP radiographs were evaluated through repeated measurements of the same digitalized radiograph by three operators using DICOM software. Data of the morphometric radiographic parameters of the forefeet were statistically analyzed for the frequency distribution and calculation of the intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) of the reproducibility of the measured parameters. Mean ± SD of digital bone and hoof parameters were significantly different among the measurements obtained for the 26 parameters. However, intra-assay and interassay CVs for digital bone and hoof parameters measurements did not differ significantly between the three examiners. In conclusion, morphometric evaluation of the radiographic parameters of the forefeet in clinically normal donkeys, establishes a reference data base correspondingly for the donkey different to those accepted for the horse.


Keywords


DICOM; donkey; forefeet; morphometric; radiography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson TM, McIlwraith CW, Douay P (2004) The role of conformation in musculoskeletal problems in the racing Thoroughbred. Equi Vet J 26: 571-5.

Balch, O, White K, Butler D, Metcalf S (1996) Hoof balance and lameness: improper toe length, hoof angle, and mediolateral balance. The Compend 17: 1275-1282.

Baxter GM (1996) Diagnosing and treating acute laminitis. Vet Med 91: 940-952.

Becht JL, Park RD, Kraft SL, Steyn F, Wrighley RH (2001) Radiographic interpretation of normal skeletal variations and pseudo lesions in the equine foot. Vet Clin North Am: Equi Pract 17: 1-18.

Caldwell MN, Allan LA, Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Kissick KE, Milner PI (2016) A test of the universal applicability of a commonly used principle of hoof balance. The Vet J 207: 169-176.

Collins SN, Dyson SJ, Murray RC (2011) Radiological anatomy of the donkey foot: objective characterization of the normal and laminitic donkey foot. Equi Vet J 43: 478-486.

Collins SN, Dyson SJ, Murray RC, Newton JR, Burden F, Trawford AF (2012) Development of a quantitative multivariable radiographic method to evaluate anatomic changes associated with laminitis in the forefeet of donkeys. Am J Vet Res 73: 1207-1218.

Collins SN, Wealleans H, Hopegood L, Latham RJ, Newlyn HA Reilly JD (2002) Current studies on the donkey hoof. Medicine and Surgery of the Donkey, Proceedings 2nd CPD Course, Glasgow, pp 1-15.

Crane M (2007) Hoof disorders of the donkey, in Proceedings. 10Th Geneva Cong Equi Med Surg: 153-156.

Cripps PJ, Eustace RA (1999) Radiological measurements from the feet of normal horses with relevance to laminitis. Equi Vet J 31: 427-432.

Dyson S, Murray R (2007) Verification of scintigraphic imaging for injury diagnosis in 264 horses with foot pain. Equi Vet J 39: 350-5.

Dyson SJ, Tranquille CA, Collins SN, Parkin TH, Murray RC (2001) An investigation of the relationships between angles and shapes of the hoof capsule and the distal phalanx. Equi Vet J 43: 295-301.

GOVS (2006) Technical Veterinary Report. General Organization of Veterinary Service, Cairo, Egypt.

Herthel D, Hood DM (1999) Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and prognosis of chronic laminitis. Vet Clin North Am: Equi Pract 15:375-394.

Kummer M, Lischer C, Vargas J, Hugelshofer, J (2004) Evaluation of a standardized technique to take radiographs of the equine hoof. Schw Arch Tierh 11: 507-514.

Linford RL, O’Brien TR, Trout DR (1993) Qualitative and morphometric radiographic findings in the distal phalanx and digital soft tissues of sound Thoroughbred racehorses. Am J vet Res 54: 38-51.

Masoudifard M, Vajhi AR, Mansouri SH, Molazem M, Bahonar AR, Zehtabvar O (2014) Radiographic measurements of front feet of the sound Akhal-Teke horses. Iran J Vet Med 8: 21-25.

Read RL, Duncan CG, Wallace AD, Perry JA, Duerr FM (2012) Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 241: 782-7.

Redden RF (2003) Radiographic imaging of the equine foot. Vet Clin North Am: Equi Pract 19: 379-92.

Reilly JD (1997) The donkey’s foot and its care. In: Svendsen ED. The professional handbook of the donkey. 2nd ed., London: Whitter Books: 71-93.

Rocha JV, Lischer CJ, Kummer M, Hässig M, Auer JA (2004) Evaluating the Measuring Software Package Metron-PX for Morphometric Description of Equine Hoof Radiographs. J Equi Vet Sci 24: 347-335.

Tucker RL, Sande RD (2001) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in equine musculoskeletal conditions. Vet Clin North Am: Equi Pract 17: 145-157.

Vali R, Zakipour S (2014) Some Radiological Measurements from the Hind Feet of Sound Dareh shori Horses with Relevance to Laminitis and Founder. Proceeding of the 4th International Symposium of Veterinary Surgery (ISVS), Mashhad, Iran: 92-95.

Vanderperren K, Raes E, Bree HV, Saunders JH (2009) Diagnostic imaging of the equine tarsal region using radiography and ultrasonography. Part 2; Bony disorders. The Vet J 179: 188-196.

Walker M, Taylor TS, Slater M (1995) Radiographic appearance of the feet of mammoth donkeys and the findings of subclinical laminitis. Vet Rad & Ultras 35: 32-37.

White JM, Mellor DJ, Duz M, Lischer CJ, Voute LC (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of digital photography and image analysis for the measurement of foot conformation in the horse. Equi Vet J 40: 623-628.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 EA EL-SHAFAEY, MG SALEM, E MOSBAH, AE ZAGHLOUL

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.