The plague epidemic in the English village of Eyam (1665-1666): Narratives, perceptions and historical memory
Abstract
Τhe case of Eyam village is considered a very important incident in the history of the plague in early modern England. The purpose of the present study is, on the one hand to examine the specific case taking into account the available primary sources as well as the secondary research up to date; on the other hand, to investigate the relevant narratives and perceptions from the time of the events up to the present day. Initially, through the review of later research the revision of the dramatic number of victims is indicated and the factors that played an important role in the spread of the epidemic is highlighted. Subsequently, Eyam's 'heroic' isolation is examined in the light of the contemporary relevant mainstream notions. Finally, through the brief review of the relevant narratives and perceptions, the transformation of historical memory as well as the instrumentalization and exploitation of the epidemic in Eyam is highlighted.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Chatzopoulou , S. (2023). The plague epidemic in the English village of Eyam (1665-1666):: Narratives, perceptions and historical memory. Mos Historicus: A Critical Review of European History, 1(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.12681/mh.34280
- Section
- Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Ownership:
Authors retain full copyright over their work published in Mos Historicus: A Critical Review of European History. By submitting to and publishing in the journal, authors grant Mos Historicus the exclusive right to first publication. All published works are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0).
License Terms:
Under the CC BY-NC 4.0 third parties may copy, distribute, display, and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes only, provided that:
i. the original author and the original publication in Mos Historicus are properly credited,
ii. and any modifications, adaptations, or other changes to the original work are clearly indicated.