open, digital, online, education, distance education

In Search of Zorba – Part II Myths, Realities, and Assorted Bedtime Stories about Leading Open, Online and Distance Education


Don Olcott, Jr.
Abstract

Indeed, is it possible to envision a future digital university landscape where we could ‘future proof’ against poor leadership?  Perhaps this is a rhetorical (and comical) question, but sometimes we need a satirical slant on important issues.  A sense of humour and having fun have shown to be essential attributes of good leaders.  We are all interested in expanding our effective leadership approaches for creating thriving organizations that are agile, innovative, and responsive to the range of shifting trends, market demands, and stakeholder needs of the 21st century.  A brave new world right – not so fast.  


 


The cold hard truth, however,  is that we live in a complex, uncertain, ever-changing world where leadership is simply hard.   Just when we think we got it – it’s gone; just when we think we understand it, we are perplexed; and just when we think we know how to implement it, we don’t have a clue!  We seem to know good leadership when we see it; and we are certain we know what poor leadership looks and feels like and yet trying to define, describe, and adapt leadership it is quite another matter (Burns, 1978; Olcott, Arnold & Blaschke, 2023).    


 


We have  a century of scholarly literature and theory about management and leadership and a vast experiential repository across a continuum of different types of organisations; and despite having  more information and knowledge at our fingertips than at any time in human  history, effective leadership often seems as elusive and enigmatic as ever (Olcott, Arnold, & Blaschke, 2023).  The brave new world of leadership was supposed to be easy according to legend.  The legend was a myth and the reality is leadership was never supposed to be easy.


 


The purpose of this paper is to present a helicopter view of selected leadership issues in online, open and distance learning with the goal of identifying some key, and perhaps new,  research questions for the future.  This article is aimed at offering a synthesis of innovative practice and experience for discerning the myths from the realities. This is not a definitive commentary or silver bullet analysis of the leadership field.  On the contrary, it is an attempt to identify some tangible and intangible leadership issues  that may give us new vantage points and reflective lightbulbs to consider in our teaching, research and practice of leadership. The format for the article is 1) identify the myth; 2) present the reality; and 3) formulate a reasonable research question (RQ) for further empirical research.

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Άρθρα
Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Literaturhinweise
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. Harper and Row.
Brown, M. (2023). Leading in changing times: Building a transformative culture. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 509 -525). Springer Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_28
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. HarperCollins.
Daniel, J. (2023). Running distance education at scale: Open universities, open schools and MOOCs. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 475 492). Springer Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_26
Harvey, J. (1974). The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, Summer74, 3(1), 63-80.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of organisational behaviour. Prentice-Hall.
House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo
vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin
Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.
Lamond, D. (2004). A matter of style: Reconciling Henri and Henry. Management Decision,
(2), 330-356.
Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager's job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 53(4),
-61.
Olcott, D. J. (2023). The Zelensky files: Leadership strategies for university leaders.
Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 11(3), 136-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32919/uesit.2023.03.01 https://uesit.org.ua/index.php/itse/article/view/414/308
Olcott, D. J. (2020a). In search of Zorba: Are you fit to lead an online distance education organisation? Open Education: The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 16(2), 6-19. https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/openjournal/article/view/9749
Olcott, D. J. (2020b). In search of leadership: Practical perspectives on leading distance education organisations. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4293194
Olcott, D. J., Arnold D. J., & Blaschke, L. M. (2023). Leadership 2030: Renewed visions
and Empowered choices for European universities. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning (EURODL), 25, (1), 74-92. https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/eurodl-2023-0006?tab=article
Olcott, D. J. & Hardy, D. (2006) (Eds.). Dancing on the glass ceiling: Women, leadership
And technology. Madison WI: Atwood Publishing.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). Jossey Bass.
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning
Organization. (2nded.). Doubleday.
Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in