open, digital, online, education, distance education

«Implementation of the learning model "4MAT" utilizing authoring tools (CourseLab) in the teaching of Ancient Greek»


Published: Sep 4, 2019
Keywords:
e-learning 4MAT ancient Greek authoring tools CourseLab
Ελένη Ευριπίδη Ριζοπούλου
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-2515
Αλιβίζος (Λοΐζος) Σοφός
Abstract

In the age where there has been significant development of new technologies, when communication, information exchange and accessibility technologies constitute a considerable change in the essence of civilization and society, it would have been impossible for education not to be part of the progress. Students in classes are changing; they are no longer satisfied with the traditional teaching methods of lectures and examinations and find school less appealing. As teachers, we are obliged to deal with this development and accept changes in both teaching methodology and the content of subjects taught and incorporate technology as a means of education. Nowadays,  fourth-generation electronic media such as the Internet, PCs and Web 2.0 tools are used in the classroom, and more and more teachers are implementing or shaping electronic learning environments themselves, thus enhancing their teaching with e-learning methods.

In this thesis, issues concerning e-learning were researched, the basic principles ruling the designing of electronic applications and the pedagogical theories were introduced, the most popular authoring tools like CourseLab were examined and presented. Also, the 4MAT learning model, the theories on which the four learning styles and the eight steps of the McCarthy learning cycle were based, and the most important overview of the bibliography on the subject, particularly in secondary education were presented and analyzed.

The objective was to investigate and detect any differences that might arise in the learning results, due to the implementation of three different methods: the traditional method, the 4MAT model and the computer-aided teaching based on the 4MAT model and the use of the CourseLab as the authoring tool, for the subject of Ancient Greek in a first year class of senior high school (on average, 15 year old students) and in particular from the "Greek" of Xenophon. For this purpose an experiment was designed with a sample of 67 students of three classes of the first year. The dependent variable is the learning outcomes despite the independent type of educational method used. Initially, the students participated in a diagnostic test to check whether the groups-parts were equivalent. Data analysis with One-way ANOVA confirmed that there were no significant statistical differences in the level of students in the three departments.

Two educational scenarios were created in the ancient Greek language course of the 1st year of the  senior high school, based on the 4MAT model and in agreement with the ASA and then two electronic courses were developed using these scenarios. The same educational modules were taught in three different classes. All three groups were taught the same modules at the same time (7 hours devoted to the teaching of the first module and 2 hours for the teaching of the second module). The first module concerned a text of ancient Greek from translation while the second module a text from the original. Two evaluation criteria were then designed to test the learning outcomes from the teachings and the pupils were given questionnaires to evaluate e-learning.  

 One-way ANOVA was used in the statistical processing of the findings, after verifying the regularity of the distribution by applying the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk criteria and the homogeneity of dispersion criteria of Levene and Kruscal-Wallis on the opposing cases. In order to apply every possible crosscheck, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney criterion was also used. Although the findings showed improvement in performance across all groups, the assessment showed no significant differences in learning outcomes for any of the three teaching methods.   

A questionnaire was then distributed to students who were taught using the 4MAT model in an electronic CourseLab environment to assess whether the learning experience in the online environment was interesting and satisfactory. The questionnaire was based on the evaluation method for electronic applications of Zaharia and Poylimenakoy. The students assessed topics related to: their attitudes towards e-learning, application content, self-assessment learning, design and navigation. Subsequently, a descriptive statistical representation of the findings with the creation of graphs was drawn up. From the processing of the questionnaire data, a generally positive attitude of the pupils towards the teaching through electronic means emerged. More specifically, by comparing traditional learning methods to e-Learning, they appear to consider the latter more effective, less difficult, that it triggers and provoked their active engagement in learning, enables self-learning and self-evaluation, and develops their critical capacity at a rate higher than 50%.            

 The results of the study converge to a wide extent with findings of other studies related to both the 4MAT model and digitally supported learning. This study shows that the teaching of the ancient Greek course can be successfully conducted in an electronic environment, as was done with the modules taught with the help of  CourseLab which followed the learning cycle of the McCarthy model. In this way modern pedagogical principles are applied in the design and realization of teaching such as experiential learning, knowledge as a result of social interactions, and learning with the help of applied methodology and practice. However, we believe that due to the limited time of teaching and the small sample, further research would be useful either on the same subject or on a similar, longer-term and larger and more representative sample.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Section 1
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Ελένη Ευριπίδη Ριζοπούλου, Aegean University
Καθηγήτρια β/βθμιας εκπ/σης
Αλιβίζος (Λοΐζος) Σοφός, Aegean University
Καθηγητής Πανεπιστημίου Αιγαίου
References
Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669–681.
Appell, C. J. (1991). The effects of the 4MAT system of instruction on academic achievement and attitude in the elementary music classroom. University of Oregon.
Benezra, S. H. (1985). Bernice McCarthy’s 4MAT Learning Style Adaptation in Middle School Life Science. Maryville College–Saint Louis.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20–24.
Bogen, J. E. (1969). The other side of the brain: II. An appositional mind. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society, 34(3), 135–162.
Bowers, P. S. (1987). The Effect of the 4MAT System on Achievement and Attitudes in Science.
Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1983). Human cerebral asymmetry (Vol. 2). Prentice Hall.
Chan, S., & R. Denner, P. (2014). Effects of learning styles on learners’ Preferences between PowerPoint and white/chalkboard lectures (Vol. 2).
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education New York. Touchstone, 18.
Duman, B. (2010). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2077–2103.
Edwards, B. (1989). Drawing on the right side of the brain: A course in enhancing creativity and artistic confidence. Rev. ed. Los Angeles: JP Tarcher/Putnam.
Ergin, S. & Sari, M. (2012). Effects of the 4MAT instruction method on the achievement of high school students with different learning styles on the subjects of work, power and energy in physics. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 807-820
Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, 35(3), 379–383.
Felder, R.M. (1996). Active learning: Who said it was easy? Newsletter, focus on faculty, from Faculty Center, 4(2).
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A realistic approach. Longman/Addison Wesley Longman.
Goyal, M., Yadav, D., & Tripathi, A. (2015). Fuzzy approach to detect learning style using McCarthy model as a tool for e-learning system. In Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), 2015 4th International Symposium on (pp. 295–300). IEEE.
Gray, D. E., & Palmer, J. (2001a). Learning styles and web-based learning: The 4MAT methodology.
Gray, D. E., & Palmer, J. (2001b). Learning Styles and Web-Based Learning: The 4MAT Methodology (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2547078). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Guzmán C.R., & Sánchez- Guzmán D.S. (2012). The 4MAT system applied to a blended-learning scenario Latin- American Journal of Physics Education, 6(I), 275-279
Hancock, C. W. (2000). Impact of the 4MAT lesson planning system on the number of times a teacher was off-task in a fifth, sixth and seventh grade classroom. Baylor University.
Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-Learning: Concepts and Practice. SAGE.
Hsieh, S.-W., Jang, Y.-R., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, N.-S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194–1201.
Huitt, W. (2000). Using the 4MAT system to design Web-based instruction. In 8th Annual Conference: Applied Psychology in Education, Mental Health, and Business.
Ιsreb, M., Jarvis J.R., & Khan A.I., (2000). An Internet-4MAT-CAL system for adaptive finite element mesh refinement. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 34(1), 1-24.
Jacobsen, G. H. (1986). Incorporating learning styles in mastery learning classrooms. Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Education, Health & Human Development.
Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types. Routledge.
Klein, D., & Ware, M. (2003). E-learning: new opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned Publishing, 16(1), 34–46.
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The Modern American College, 1, 232–255.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiental learning. Englewood Cliffs.
Κυριαζής, Α., Μπακογιάννης, Σ. (2003). Χρήση των νέων τεχνολογιών στην εκπαίδευση. Συνύπαρξη διδακτικής πράξης και τεχνολογίας. Αθήνα: Ίδιοι
Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-learning models study report.
McCARTHY, B. (1980). The 4mat system: Teaching to learning styles with left/right mode techniques. Arlington Heights, IL: Excel.
McCarthy, B. (1987). The 4MAT system: Teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. Excel, Incorporated.
McCarthy, B. (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT’s learning styles. Educational Leadership, 54, 46–51.
McCarthy, B. (2000). About Teaching 4 MAT in the classroom. Wauconda, IL: About Learning, Inc.
McCarthy, B., Germain, C.St., & Lippitt, L. (2002). The 4MAT Research Guide: Reviews of Literature on Individual Differences and Hemispheric Specialization and their Influence on Learning. About Learning, Incorporated: Wauconda, Illinois.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2006). Teaching around the 4MAT cycle. California: Corwin Press.
McDonald, J. (2002) “Is ‘As Good As Face-To-Face’ As Good As It Gets?” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(2): 10-23
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7
Morley, J. A. (2000). The effect of the 4MAT system of instruction on achievement in students completing computer certification courses through distance education.
Murray, T., Blessing, S., & Ainsworth, S. (2003). Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Toward Cost-Effective Adaptive, Interactive and Intelligent Educational Software. Springer Science & Business Media.
NetDay. (2004). Voices and views of today’s tech-savvy students: National report on NetDay Speak Up Day for Students 2003.
Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.
Νικήτας, Π. (2013). Εισαγωγή στη στατιστική ανάλυση πειραματικών δεδομένων. ΣΙΜΩΝΗ.
Νικολάου, Α.(2010). Σχεδιασμός καινοτόμου εξ αποστάσεως εκπαιδευτικού υλικού με τη χρήση του 4MAT Model της McCarthy. Ένα παράδειγμα σχεδιασμού και ανάπτυξης εκπαιδευτικού υλικού για νηπιαγωγούς αναφορικά με τη δραματική τέχνη στην προσχολική αγωγή. Πάτρα: Ελληνικό Ανοιχτό Πανεπιστήμιο.
Pallatto-Fontaine, D. (1989). Effects of the 4MAT System of Instruction on the Self-esteem and Behavior of Ninth-grade Students. University of Connecticut.
Paraskevas, A., & Sigala, M. (n.d.). (2004) 4MAT-ting Teaching for Multiple Learning Styles.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child by Piaget, Jean: Viking Press 9780670621729 First Edition. - Better World Books. Viking Press
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Roschelle, M., Pea, D.,Hoadley, M., Gordin, N., & Means, M. (2002). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. (Electronic Version). The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology,10 (2),76-101
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. North Carolina State University.
Scott, C. (2010). The enduring appeal of ‘learning styles.’ Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 5–17.
Sofos, A., & Kron, F. W. (2010). Erfolgreicher Unterricht mit Medien. Logophon.
Szewczyk, L. (1989). Effects of 4MAT, an experientially-based teaching method upon achievement and selected attitudinal factors of high school geometry students.
Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World HC (1st ed.). Mcgraw-Hill.
Tatar, E., & Dikici, R. (2009). The effect of the 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(8), 1027–1036.
Thompson, R. L. (1986). American music: a humanities teaching model for the alternative school with special focus on learning styles. University of Minnesota.
Vaughn, V. L. F. (1993). A comparison of the 4MAT System of instruction with two enrichment units based on Bloom’s Taxonomy with gifted third graders in a pull-out program.
Wichadee, S. (2013). Facilitating students’ learning with hybrid instruction: A comparison among four learning styles. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(29).
Wilkerson, R. M. (1987). AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE 4MAT SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION OF LEARNING (HEMISPHERICITY).
Zacharis, N. Z. (2010). The impact of learning styles on student achievement in a web-based versus an equivalent face-to-face course. College Student Journal, 44(3), 591.
Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for e-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98.
Zekavat, P.R., Siew, R., & Bernold, L.E. (2013). Engineering sketching, journaling and it: Synergized learning tools. ISEC 2013 - 7th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: New Developments in Structural Engineering and Construction. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 18-23 June.