open, digital, online, education, distance education

Teaching through written assignments in the Open University: an approach to the “voice” of postgraduate students on Instructional Discourse

PDF
Published: Jul 8, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.23156
Keywords:
Written assignments Open University instructional discourse regulative discourse
Gerasimos S. Koustourakis
University of Patras
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-5399
Abstract

This paper aims to approach and analyse students’ views on educational work that is carried out through the preparation of and feedback on written assignments, which constitute a fundamental element of the Open University teaching procedure, by making use of the concepts of instructional discourse and regulative discourse from Basil Bernstein’s theory, as well as the concept of institutional habitus.  The research data were collected through semi-structured interviews with a sample of postgraduate students who were following the “Open Distance Learning” Module with the Hellenic Open University (HOU).  The research findings reveal that the students would like Visible Pedagogies to be implemented during the conduct of distance teaching through written assignments.  In particular, in contrast to the regulations of the HOU institutional habitus they would like to be provided with a great deal of time to produce their assignments, and for their assignments to be corrected by their tutors within a week.  In addition, the students would like the requirements concerning the selection of the educational material they should consult, and the sequencing of  their text,  as well as the assessment criteria used to evaluate their written effort, to be made clear and obvious, as much prior to the preparation of their papers, as during correction of them .

Article Details
  • Section
  • Section 1

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Gerasimos S. Koustourakis, University of Patras

Gerasimos S. Koustourakis is professor in the sociology of education and school knowledge at the Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education, University of Patras, Greece. E-mail: koustourakis@upatras.gr

References
Anderson, B. (2007). Independent learning. In Μ.G. Moore (Εd.), Handbook of distance education (pp.109-122). Μahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bei, E., Mavroidis, I., & Giossos, Y. (2020). Development of a Scale for Measuring the Learner Autonomy of Distance Education Students. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 22(2), 133-144.
Burke, D. & Pieterick, J. (2010). Giving students effective written feedback. Berkshire: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse: Vol. IV Class, Codes & Control. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic control and identity. Theory, Research, Critique (Revised edition). N.Y.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bernstein, B. (2004). Social class and pedagogic practice. In S.J. Ball (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 196-217). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Blair, A., & McGinty, S. (2013). Feedback-dialogues: exploring the student perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 466-476.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.),Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Calfoglou, C., Georgountzou, A., Hill, M., & Sifakis, N. (2011). Factors affecting written distance-learning feedback: the tutor’s perspective. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 111-121.
Chatzinikita, V., & Vorvilas, G. (2019). Assessment of written feedback on educational activities: the "voice" of HOU's students. Open Education–The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 15(2), 78-94.
Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(1), 67-78.
Chokwe, J. M. (2015). Students’ and tutors’ perceptions of feedback on academic essays in an open and distance learning context. Open Praxis, 7(1), 39-56.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Educational research methodology. Athens: Metaichmio.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 1, 3-31.
Gravett, S., & Petersen, N. (2002). Structuring dialogue with students via learning tasks. Innovative Higher Education, 26(4), 281-291.
Gregori, P., Martínez, V., & Moyano-Fernández, J. J. (2018). Basic actions to reduce dropout rates in distance learning. Evaluation and program planning, 66, 48-52.
Hellenic Open University (HOU) (2019). Preparation of written assignments. Accessed April 25, 2019 from: https://www.eap.gr/el/spoudes-sto-eap/ekpaideusi/kanonismoi/kanonismos-spoudwn.
Holmberg, B. (2002). Distance Education. Theory & Practice. Athens: Hellin Editions.
Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. In M. Slowey & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher education and the lifecourse (pp. 67–78). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Ingram, N. (2009). Working-class boys, educational success and the misrecognition of working-class culture. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(4), 412-434.
Kofou, I. (2019). A pilot study on conditions under which assessment of and feedback on written assignments affect learning. Research Papers in Language Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 117-133.
Koustourakis, G. (2006). An attempt formation of the framework for the organization and functioning of the Hellenic Open University: A sociological approach. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), Open and Distance Education: Elements of theory and praxis (pp. 42-77). Athens: Propobos.
Koustourakis, G. (2015). Could the evaluation of written essays affect tutor-student communication in distance learning? Perceptions of Open University postgraduate students. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 2(2), 45-58.
Koustourakis, G. (2017). Exploiting sociological knowledge in the case of schools and teachers. In Contemporary Research Trends in Preschool and First School Age (pp. 150-164). Athens: New Technologies Editions.
Koustourakis, G., & Paizis, N. (2013). A sociological approach of the Contact Sessions in the case of the Module DEO34 ‘Economic Analysis and Policy’ of the undergraduate program Business Administration of the Hellenic Open University. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.). Proceedings 7th International Conference in Open and Distance Learning ‘Learning Methodologies’ (Volume 1, pp. 23-36). Athens: Editions of the Hellenic Network of Open and Distance Education
Koustourakis, G., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Vergidis, D. (2008). A Contribution to the Hellenic Open University: Evaluation of the pedagogical practices and the use of ICT on distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1-18.
Kreonidou, G., & Kazamia, V. (2019). Assignment feedback in distance education: How do students perceive it?. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 134-153.
Kripendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousant Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lionarakis, A. (1998). Continuous communication and evaluation of the student. In A. Kokkos & A. Lionarakis (Eds.), Open Distance Learning. Teachers - students relations (Vol. B', pp. 241-253). Patras: HOU
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: students' perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(3), 263-275.
Maliotaki, D. (2019). Let feedback make the connection: Battling isolation in Distance Learning-The case of the MEd in TESOL students of the Hellenic Open University. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 188-209.
Mason, J. (2011). The conduct of qualitative research. Athens: Pedio.
Mirador, J. (2018). Investigating' Criticality' in written assignments of postgraduate students. Writing & Pedagogy, 10(1-2), 61-92.
Moore, R. (2013). Basil Bernstein. The thinker and the field. London and N.Y.: Routledge.
Morais, A.M. (2002). Basil Bernstein at the Micro Level of the Classroom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 559-569.
Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 369-386.
Patton, M. A. (2000). The importance of being flexible with assignment deadlines. Higher Education in Europe, 25(3), 417-423.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications.
Pierrakeas, C., Xenos, M., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Vergidis, D. (2004). A comparative study of dropout rates and causes for two different distance education courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1-15.
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in higher education, 36(8), 879-896.
Race, P. (1999). The Handbook of Open Learning. Athens: Metaixmio.
Reay, D., David, M.E., & Ball, S.J. (2005). Degrees of Choice. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Robertson, S. I. (2014). Academic essay writing as imitative problem solving: examples from distance learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 263-274.
Robson, C. (2007). Real world research. A means for social scientists and research professionals. Athens: Gutenberg.
Ryan, T., & Henderson, M. (2018). Feeling feedback: students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 880-892.
Simpson, O. (2018). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning. N.Y.: Routledge.
Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). ‘There was never really any question of anything else': young people's agency, institutional habitus and the transition to higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(2), 263-281.
Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423-442.
Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 67-78.
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501.