The use of restored monuments for the exhibition of contemporary artworks: where is (preventive) conservation? -


Published: Jul 28, 2023
Keywords:
bioclimatic design, preventive conservation, contemporary art.
Konstantinos Stoupathis
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4013-3275
Abstract

Abstract. The key issue raised in this paper concerns the absence of an institutional framework for the operation of the buildings with the condition of preventive conservation of the modern collections. The main interest of curators focuses on the restoration of the monument in order to be "functional" and accessible rather than to the provision of facilities that will prevent the deterioration of contemporary works (two-dimensional paintings, in-situ installations, sculptures, video projections, etc.). Secondly, the monuments cannot always provide possibilities for a controlled microclimate. The fact that the exhibits are modern, made of technologically advanced or recycled materials - sometimes not original ones but replicas - should not preclude the practical application of preventive conservation measures. After all, it is proven that the establishment of an exhibition regulation is necessary regardless of the bioclimatic design of the buildings.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Cultural Heritage
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
References
Eastop, D., Conservation practice as enacted ethics. In J. Marstine (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics: Redefining Ethics for the Twenty-First Century Museum, pp.426-444. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2011). Τhe reader may see the pages 437-438.
Sakellariou, A. Προληπτική συντήρηση: καλύτερη της θεραπείας! Αρχαιολογία&Τέχνες, 175, 47-52 (2010).
Brooks, M.:Sharing conservation ethics, practice and decision-making with museum visitors In J. Marstine (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Museum Ethics : Redefining Ethics for the Twenty-First Century Museum, 332-347. Taylor & Francis Group: London (2011).
Golfomitsou, S.: Conservation in the 21st Century. Materials, concepts and audiences. In: D. Kimmel & S. Bruggerhoff (eds.), Museums-Places of Authenticity?, pp.89-96. Propylaeum, Heidelberg (2020).
Stamatopoulou, E.: Βιοκλιματικός σχεδιασμός Πολιτιστικών-Εκθεσιακών χώρων, Μουσείων και Ιστορικών κτηρίων, Αρχαιολογία και Τέχνες, 114, 96-102. (2010).
Mπάνου, Ε. “Εγκατάσταση στον χώρου του Κεραμεικού”. Σ. Τσιάρα (Επ.) Mαρία Λοϊζίδου “Μετάβαση”, Αρχαιολογικός χώρος και Μουσείο Κεραμικού-Έργο στην πόλη, 17-19, Εκδόσεις Άγρα: Αθήνα.
Kuhne, A., Kirch, L.: Some thoughts on the changing presentation and preservation of modern and post modern art. in U. Schadler, A. Weber (eds.) Theory and practice in the conservation of Modern and contemporary art, pp.120-134. Αrchetype, London (2010).
Gwynne, R.: Variable materials, variable roles: the shifting skills required in contemporary art conservation. In: Objects Specialty Group Postprints, 18, 2011, pp. 105-112. The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works, Washington. http://resources.culturalheritage.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/02/osg018-10.pdf,last accessed 2022/12/10.
Oliveira, N., Oxley, N., Petry, M.: Installation art in the new Millennium. Thames & Hudson, London (2003).
Veiga, M.R., Carvahlio, F.: Experimental characterization of lime based rendering and repointing mortars, definition of relevant laboratorial and in situ tests. Ιn: Raphael Comarech, Compatible Materials recommendations for the preservation of European Cultural Heritage, pp. 151-162. Αssociation of Civil Engineers of Greece, Athens. (2000).
Stolow, N. Conservation and Exhibitions. Packing, transport, storage and environmental considerations. Βutterworths, London.(1987).
Stamatopoulou, E.: Βιοκλιματικός σχεδιασμός Πολιτιστικών, Εκθεσιακών χώρων, Μουσείων και Ιστορικών κτηρίων. Αρχαιολογία και Τέχνες, 115, 53-58. (2010)
O ́ Doherty, B. Inside the white cube. University of California Press: Berkley/LA/ London (1999).
Smithson, R.: Cultural confinement, 1972. In A. Alberro & B. Stimson (eds.) Institutional critique, an anthology of artists writings, pp. 140-142. Institute of Technology,Massachusetts (2009).
Kyung, A., Cerasi, J.: Who ́s afraid of Contemporary art. Thames & Hudson Ltd, UK(2020).
Riegl, A. The Modern cult of Monuments: Its Essence and its development, in N. Stanley-Price, M. Kirby-Talley, A. Melucco-Vaccaro (eds.) Historical and Philosophical Issues in the conservation of Cultural heritage, pp.69-83. The Getty Conservation Institute, LA (1996).
Lorenc, J., Skolnick, L., Berger, C.: What is exhibition design? Rotovision SA, Uk(2007).
Βαρώτσος, Κ. Ακολουθώντας το αντικειμενικό χάνουμε το πραγματικό. Βιωματικές εμπειρίες από το εξωτερικό. Συγκρίσεις με την Ελλάδα. Πρακτικά Επιστημονικού Συνεδρίου “Η Αισθητική των Πόλεων & η Πολιτική των παρεμβάσεων, Συμβολή στην αναγέννηση του αστικού χώρου”, Αθήνα 13-14 Οκτωβρίου 2003,109-117. Ενοποίηση Αρχαιολογικών Χώρων: Αθήνα (2004).
Huber, C. Expanded Interiors, bringing contemporary site-specific fine-art practice to Roman houses at Herculaneum and Pompeii. In N. Cass, G. Park and A. Powell (eds.) Contemporary Art in heritage spaces, pp.133-148, Routledge: London & NY (2020).
Duilio, M., Moyano-Mercander, P., Gomez, A. Reusing maintenance monitoring data on preventive conservation. Ge-conservación Journal, no 22, pp. 130-138 (2022). GeGrupo Espanol de Conservacion-IIC. https://ge-iic.com/ojs/index.php/revista /issue/view/23 (last accessed 2023/1/17).
Macdonald, S., Goncalves, A.P.A., Conservation principles for concrete of cultural significance. Getty Conservation Institute: LA (2020). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susan-Macdonald-5/publication/344694783_Conservation_Principles_for_Concrete_of_Cultural_Significance/links/5f89e8d6a6fdccfd7b658a43/Conservation-Principles-for-Concrete-of-Cultural-Significance.pdf (last accessed 2022/12/4).
Stoupathis K., Informatics for Preventive Conservation at Restored Monuments Exhibiting Artworks, Journal Informatics Studies, Heritage Informatics, Vol 10, No 4 (2023)