Seismic risk assessment of buildings and infrastructures using Artificial Neural Networks: Empirical prediction equations


Published: Apr 30, 2024
Keywords:
Seismic risk assessment seismic hazard artificial neural networks ground motion prediction equations seismic strong motion
Konstantinos Morfidis
Dimitrios Sotiriadis
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9088-4214
Sotiria Stefanidou
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-9340
Olga Markogiannaki
Anna Karatzetzou
Basil Margaris
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-8401
Abstract

The reliable assessment of the seismic risk, at urban, regional and national level, is extremely important for the government and society and contributes to the proper management of the pre-seismic crisis (interventions, strengthening of buildings and infrastructures), during the earthquake and post-earthquake. The seismic risk assessment involves many difficulties and uncertainties, as it depends on the successful implementation of several individual steps, starting with the identification of the elements at risk, continuing with the assessment of seismic risk and vulnerability and finishing with the estimation of the risk and losses of all types. In all the above methodological frameworks, the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) is proposed in the literature. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methodologies aim to improve the computational efficiency of simulations, by increasing the accuracy and reducing the computational cost. In this paper, a methodology using ANNs at the seismic hazard level is suggested to propose strong motion prediction equations (GMPE) derived from ANN training, by developing a methodological framework and a computational tool that enables continuous training and learning depending on the strong motion data that are fed to it. The proposed equations are compared with models in the literature to verify the reliability of their applicability.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Artificial Intelligence
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Xie, Y, Ebad Sichani, Μ., Padgett, J. E. & DesRoches, R. (2020) The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 36(4), 1769–180.
Stefanidou S.P., Papanikolaou V.K., Paraskevopoulos E.A., Kappos, A.J., (2021) Machine learning techniques for the estimation of limit state thresholds and bridge-specific fragility analysis of RC bridges. 8th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2021, Athens, 27-30 June
Ji, D., C. Li, C. Zhai, Y. Dong, E. I. Katsanos, and W. Wang (2021). Prediction of Ground-Motion Parameters for the NGA-West2 Database Using Refined Second-Order Deep Neural Networks, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111, 3278–3296, doi: 10.1785/0120200388
Baker, J. W. & Jayaram, N. (2008). Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 299–317
Haykin S. Neural networks and learning machines. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall; 2009
Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer Feedforward Networks are Universal Approximators. Neural Networks 1989;2(5):359-366
Konstantinos E. Morfidis and Konstantinos G. Kostinakis. Use of artificial neural networks in the R/C buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment: the practical point of view. In: Proceedings of 7th Conference in Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN2019), Crete island, Greece, 24-26 June 2019 (Paper Number: C19299)
Margaris, B., E. Scordilis, J.P. Stewart, D.M. Boore, N. Theodoulidis, I. Kalogeras, N. Melis, A. Skarlatoudis, N. Klimis, and E.Seyhan (2021). Hellenic Strong‐Motion Database with Uniformly Assigned Source and Site Metadata for period of 1972‐2015, Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 92, No. 3, pp 2065– 2080
K. Diamantaras and D. Botsis, Machine Learning, “Klidarithmos” Publications, Athens 2019 (In Greek).
Boore, D. M., J. P. Stewart, A. A. Skarlatoudis, E. Seyhan, B. Margaris, N. Theodoulidis, E. Scordilis, I. Kalogeras, N. Klimis, and N. S. Melis. A Ground-Motion Prediction Model for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Greece, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2021; 111(2): 857–874
Kotha S. R., Weatherhil G., Bindi D., Cotton F. A regionally-adaptable ground motion model for shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2020; 18: 4091 – 4125
Chiou B. S.-J., Youngs R. R. Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra, Earthquake Spectra 2014; 30: 1117 – 1153
Abrahamson N., Youngs R. A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1992; 82: 505 – 510