Perceptions of Residents, Entrepreneurs and Visitors on Issues of Historicity of the City Centre. The case of Historic Commercial Triangle (Emporiko Trigono) of Athens.

pdf
Published: Apr 29, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ta.40935
Keywords:
Historicity of the city Historic preservation Perceptions on historicity Opinion survey
Nikolaos Samaras
University of Thessaly
Abstract

Historicity of a city district is mainly a network of relationships between the district and its people. The human factor, in the process of protecting the historical heritage of the city district, concerns ‘people of the city’, politicians and technocrats, also residents, entrepreneurs, and visitors, whose actions, views, beliefs, perceptions influence its planning and implementation.
In order to survey the perceptions on historicity of the Commercial Triangle (Emporiko Trigono) of Athens, a questionnaire was addressed a random sample of residents, entrepreneurs and visitors of the district. Through the study of the results findings are presented, some of which confirm and others do not support, the research hypotheses:
1. The district has a historic physiognomy that favors certain kinds of business activity.
2. One of the most characteristic elements of this physiognomy is its historic buildings.
3. The overall evolution of this historic physiognomy over time is generally considered negative.
4. The problem of degradation of the center of Athens through vacant and abandoned properties highlights the priority of re-use of historic buildings.
5. The protection institutional framework of the Commercial Triangle (Emporiko Trigono) of Athens is considered satisfactory, but needs to be implemented.
6. One of the main reasons for preserving historic districts of cities is that they have unique architecture.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Cultural Heritage
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aravantinos, A. 2002. Dynamics and planning of the city centers for the following decades - towards centralised or decentralised schemes? Aeihoros 1 (1): 6-29
Avgerinou-Kolonias, S. 2002. Transformations of the modern Greek city. New uses and cultural heritage. Proceedings of the 10th Panhellenic Architectural Conference, Athens: TEE/SADAS/PEA, 379-386
Avgerinou-Kolonias, S. 2014. Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas (Washington 1987). In: Smith C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, Springer, New York, pp.1372-1374
Bouras, C. 2010. The restoration of architectural monuments in Greece. Fifty years’ cronicle: 1950-2000. In: Maintenance, Anastylose and Restoration of Monuments in Greece 1950-2000, eds. Charalambos Bouras and Panagiotis Tournikiotis, 29-72. Athens: The Piraeus Bank Group Cultural Foundation (PIOP)
Champagne, P. 2004. The construction of public opinion. Athens: Patakis
Cherchi, P. 2015. Adaptive reuse of abandoned monumental buildings as a strategy for urban live ability. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(4), 253-270
Fatouros, D. 2006. Change, Duration and Identity or the Faces of Reuse. Architectural Transformations, vol. 1: Metropolitan Centers, 10-15. Athens: Melissa
Filippidis, D. 2006. Preface. Architectural Transformations, vol. 1: Metropolitan Centers, 8-9. Athens: Melissa
Hirsch, E. and Stewart, C., 2005, ‘Introduction: Ethnographies of Historicity’, History and Anthropology 16 (3), pp. 261-274
Konstantinidis, A. 1972/1987. ‘Vessels of life’ or ‘The problem for a real Greek architecture’. About Architecture, 213-270. Athens: Agras
Mallouchou-Tufano, F. 2016. Protection and Management of Monuments [e-book] Athens: Association of Hellenic Academic Libraries (http://hdl.handle.net/11419/6466)
Misirlisoy, D., and Günçe, K. 2016. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustainable cities and society, 26, 91-98
Olmo, C. 1992. The Aesthetics of Cities. Social Contract and Collective Vision. Tefchos (9): 62-65
Panayotopoulos, Ν., ed. 1999. Pierre Bourdieu: Sociology Essays. Athens: Stachy
Shao, Q. 2012. Citizens versus Experts: Historic Preservation in Globalizing Shanghai. Future Anterior 9 (1): 16-31
Stamos, G. 1994. A. Giddens: for the double interpretation and structuration. Dokimes, September, B ́: 129-150, http://pandemos.panteion.gr:8080/fedora/objects/iid:8457/datastreams/PDF1/content (accessed March 25, 2020)
Stewart, C., 2016, ‘Historicity and Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology 45, October 2016, pp. 79-94
Theologidou, K. 2007. ‘Facadism’ and Modern Architectural Heritage, e-magazine Monumenta, (http://www.monumenta.org/article.php?IssueID=3&lang=gr&CategoryID=1&ArticleID=22)
Triantafyllopoulos, N. 2018. The problem of vacant and abandoned buildings in the centre of Athens.(https://www.dianeosis.org/2018/02/abandoned-buildings-athens/)
Waitt, G., 2000, Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of tourism research, 27(4), 835-862
Wells, J. C. 2015. Making a Case for Historic Place Conservation Based on People’s Values. Forum Journal 29 (3): 44-62
Zitouni-Petrogianni, G., Paraschou, A., and Maistrou, H. 2022. Abandoned or degraded areas in historic cities: the importance of multifunctional reuse for development through the example of the historic commercial triangle (Emporiko Trigono) of Athens. Land,
(1), 114