Η αξιοποίηση του Διαδραστικού Πίνακα στο ελληνικό δημόσιο σχολείο: Μια πρώτη αποτίμηση σε εκπαιδευτικούς της Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης

PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: янв. 1, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/thete.39997
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
Διαδραστικός πίνακας δευτεροβάθμια εκπαίδευση
Ελένη Παπαντωνίου
Περιφερειακό Κέντρο Εκπαιδευτικού Σχεδιασμού Στερεάς Ελλάδας
Περίληψη

Η εργασία παρουσιάζει εμπειρικά δεδομένα σχετικά με την εκπαιδευτική αξιοποίηση των Διαδραστικών Πινάκων (ΔΠ) που εγκαταστάθηκαν στα ελληνικά δημόσια σχολεία της Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης, τόσο σε σχέση με την προσβασιμότητα από τους εκπαιδευτικούς, όσο και σε σχέση με τη διδακτική αξιοποίηση στη διδακτική πράξη. Σε πρώτο επίπεδο, διερευνήθηκε εάν οι υπάρχοντες ΔΠ ανταποκρίνονται στη ζήτηση της εκπαιδευτικής χρήσης από τους ενεργούς εκπαιδευτικούς. Δεδομένου ότι η διδασκαλία χρειάζεται κατάλληλη χρήση των ΤΠΕ, η ανεπαρκής πρόσβαση σε διαδραστικό εξοπλισμό πιθανόν μειώνει τη δυναμική για την ουσιαστική παιδαγωγική αλλαγή για δεξιότητες του 21ου αιώνα. Για το σκοπό αυτό διεξήχθη εμπειρική μελέτη με 185 εκπαιδευτικούς δημόσιων σχολείων της Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης. Τα αποτελέσματά έδειξαν ότι υπάρχουν ακόμη προβλήματα ως προς την επάρκεια των τεχνολογικών υποδομών και ότι, σε δεύτερο επίπεδο, οι δυσλειτουργίες ως προς την διάθεση και κατανομή των τεχνολογικών πόρων εμποδίζουν την εκπαιδευτική εξοικείωση που αναδεικνύει τον ΔΠ σε ένα δυναμικό εργαλείο που αλλάζει τις καθιερωμένες πρακτικές στο ελληνικό σχολείο.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Articles
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Akcay, A.O., Arslan, H., & Guven, U. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes toward using interactive whiteboards. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 17, 22-30.
Al-Faki, I.M., & Khamis, A.H.A. (2014). Difficulties facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in their classes. American International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 136–158.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technology and pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154-168.
Burke, P., Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Kearney, M., & Frischknecht, B. (2017). Exploring teacher pedagogy, stages of concern and accessibility as determinants of technology adoption. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27, 1-15.
Cabus, S.J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). SMART in Mathematics? Exploring the effects of in‐class‐level differentiation using SMART board on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 145-161.
Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2017). The effect of smart boards on the cognition and motivation of students. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 60-68.
Duval, E., Sharples, M., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Research themes in technology enhanced learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer.
Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
European Commission, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology (2013). Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools (2013). Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg. Retrieved 13 January 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf.
European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology (2019). 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Objective 1: Benchmark progress in ICT in schools (2019). Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg. Retrieved 18 May 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-singlemarket/en/news/2nd-survey-schools-ict-education.
Flores, J.G., Santero, J.R., & Torres-Gordillo, J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441- 449.
Giannikas, C. N. (2016). The use of interactive whiteboards: enhancing the nature of teaching young language learners. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 160-166). Research-publishing.net.
Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., & Planinsic, G. (2018). A new way of using the interactive whiteboard in a high school physics classroom: A case study. Research in Science Education, 48 (2), 465–489.
Hammond, M., Crosson, S., Fragkouli, E., Ingram, J., Kingston, Y., Pope, M., & Wray, D. (2009). Why do some student teachers make very good use of ICT? An exploratory case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18, 59-73.
Heemskerk, I., Kuiper, E., & Meijer, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard and virtual learning environment combined: effects on mathematics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 465-478.
Hennessy, S. (2017). International experiences with integrating interactive whiteboards: policy, practice, pedagogy and professional development. In R. Maclean (Ed.), Life in Schools and Classrooms. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects (pp. 633-650). Singapore: Springer.
Ishtaiwa, F.F., & Shana, Z. (2011). The use of interactive whiteboard (IWB) by pre-service teachers to enhance Arabic language teaching and learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 8(2), 1-18.
Hennessy, S., & London, L. (2013). Learning from international experiences with interactive whiteboards: The role of professional development in integrating the technology. OECD Education Working Papers, 89. OECD Publishing. Retrieved 13 May 2019, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k49chbsnmls-en.
Jadhav, K. (2012). Teachers perspective on the contribution of interactive whiteboards in classroom environments. Managing Educational Technology, Dissertation, Information Technology Faculty, The British University Of Dubai.
Karsenti, T. (2016). The Interactive Whiteboard (IWB): Uses, Benefits, and Challenges. A survey of 11,683 students and 1,131 teachers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(5). Retrieved 13 March 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1130139.pdf.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., & Burke, P.F. (2018). Teachers’ technology adoption and practices: lessons learned from the IWB phenomenon. Teacher Development, 22(4), 481-496.
Kneen, J. (2015). Interactive whiteboards and English teaching: A consideration of typical practice. English in Education, 49(3), 215-232.
Kyza, E.A., Erduran, S., & Tiberghien, A. (2009) Technology-Enhanced Learning in Science. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 121-134). Dordrecht: Springer.
Laurillard, D., Oliver, M., Wasson, B., Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing Technology-Enhanced Learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 289-306). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 291-303.
Ludvigsen, S., & Arnseth, H.C. (2017). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Pedagogical and technological scaffolding. In E. Duval, M. Sharples & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 47-58). Cham: Springer.
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M.K., Franey, J.J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211
Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2016). Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 59-75.
Piroska, B. (2012). Teachers and the interactive whiteboards. Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 10. Retrieved 13 March 2019, from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279955838_Teachers_and_the_interactive_whiteboards.
Samsonova, O. (2019). Εxploring elementary teachers’ practices with response to IWBS. International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 3(1), 130-145.
Saville, M., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2014). The use of interactive whiteboards in education. In N. Fitzallen, R. Reaburn & S. Fan (Eds.), The Future of Educational Research. Bold Visions in Educational Research (pp. 203-216). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Schmid, C.E., & Whyte, S. (2012). Interactive whiteboards in state school settings: Teacher responses to socio-constructivist hegemonies. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), 65-86.
Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.
Smith, L. (2014). ICT for English in English ITE: An investigation into the ICT component of PCGE English courses. English in Education, 48(1), 63-75.
Tosuntaş, B., Karadağ, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of technology. Computers & Education, 81, 169-178.
Tunaboylu, C., & Demir, E. (2017). The effect of teaching supported by interactive whiteboard on students’ mathematical achievements in lower secondary education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 81-94.
Türel, Y.K., & Johnson, T.E (2012). Teachers‘ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394.
Van Laer, S., Beauchamp, G., & Colpaert, J. (2014). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboards in Flemish secondary education—mapping against a transition framework. Education and Information Technology, 19, 409–423.
Vainoryte, B., & Zygaitiene, B. (2015). Peculiarities of interactive whiteboard application during lessons in Lithuanian general education schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1672-1678.
Whyte, S., Beauchamp, G., & Alexander, J. (2014). Researching interactive whiteboard (IWB) use from primary school to university settings across Europe: an analytical framework for foreign language teaching. Journal of Education, 17(1), 30-52.
Ελληνική Στατιστική Αρχή (ΕΛΣΤΑΤ) (2018). Έρευνες Δευτεροβάθμιας Γενικής Εκπαίδευσης (Γυμνάσια και Λύκεια) Λήξης Σχολικού Έτους 2016-17. Δελτίο Τύπου, 31-10-2018.