Κατασκευή και επικύρωση εργαλείου μέτρησης πεποιθήσεων για τη φύση της γνώσης και της μάθησης
Δημοσιευμένα:
Jan 1, 2016
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
διδακτική των επιστημών επιστημολογικές πεποιθήσεις υποψήφιοι δάσκαλοι κατασκευή εργαλείου μέτρησης
Περίληψη
Η παρούσα έρευνα στόχευε στην κατασκευή και επικύρωση ενός εργαλείου μέτρησης επιστημολογικών πεποιθήσεων, δηλαδή πεποιθήσεων που αφορούν στη φύση της γνώσης και της μάθησης. Για την κατασκευή και επικύρωση του εργαλείου χρησιμοποιήθηκε δείγμα 319 υποψήφιων δασκάλων. Το εργαλείο αποτελείται από 30 δηλώσεις που αντιπροσωπεύουν πέντε διαστάσεις επιστημολογικών πεποιθήσεων. Η επικύρωσή του έγινε μέσω Επιβεβαιωτικής Ανάλυσης Παραγόντων (Confirmatory Factor Analysis-CFA). Για τον υπολογισμό των παραμέτρων του μοντέλου χρησιμοποιήθηκε η μέθοδος της μέγιστης πιθανοφάνειας (maximum likelihood-ML), ενώ για την αξιολόγηση του βαθμού προσαρμογής των δεδομένων στο μοντέλο χρησιμοποιήθηκαν τέσσερις διαφορετικοί δείκτες καλής προσαρμογής (fit indices). Για την αξιοπιστία του μοντέλου υπολογίστηκε ο συντελεστής εσωτερικής συνάφειας Cronbach alpha. Το συγκεκριμένο εργαλείο ονομάζεται Ελληνική Κλίμακα Μέτρησης των Διαστάσεων των Επιστημολογικών Πεποιθήσεων (Ε.Κ.ΜΕ.Δ.Ε.Π). Με βάση τα αποτελέσματα, αποτελεί ένα έγκυρο και αξιόπιστο εργαλείο, που εκτιμάται ότι θα φανεί χρήσιμο στην προσπάθεια προώθησης των επιστημολογικών πεποιθήσεων στην εκπαίδευση, με έμφαση στις Φυσικές Επιστήμες και ιδιαίτερα στη Βιολογία.
Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
- Πώς να δημιουργήσετε Αναφορές
-
Μπάιτελμαν Α., & Κωνσταντίνου Κ. (2016). Κατασκευή και επικύρωση εργαλείου μέτρησης πεποιθήσεων για τη φύση της γνώσης και της μάθησης. Θέματα Επιστημών και Τεχνολογίας στην Εκπαίδευση, 9(3), 151–172. ανακτήθηκε από https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/thete/article/view/44411
- Ενότητα
- Articles
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Apostolou, A., & Koulaidis, V. (2010). Epistemology and science education: a study of epistemological views of teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 149-166.
Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, O., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H, I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30(1), 9-24.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian post-secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 539-565.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47(1), 1–31.
Bråten, I., & Stromso, H. (2010a). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38(7), 635-657.
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Samuelstuen, M.S. (2008). Are sophisticated students better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814-840.
Braten, I., Britt, M., Stromso, H., & Rouet, J. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.
Braten, I., Stromso, H., & Salmeron, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 180-192.
Buehl, M., & Alexander, P. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726.
Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, application, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carliste, J.E., Feezell, J.T., Michaud, K.E.H., Smith, E.R.A., & Smith, l. (2010). The publics trust in scientific claims regarding offshore oil drilling. Public Understanding Science, 19(5), 514-527.
Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141-167.
Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425-453). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Conley, A., Pintrich, P., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186-2014.
Cortina, J.M (1993). What is coefficient alpha: an examination of theory and application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
Cronbach, L. (1990). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148.
Ferguson, L. E., Braten, I., & Stomson, H. I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think – aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 103-120.
Griffin, P. (2005). Developing a measure of wealth for primary student families in a developing country: Comparison of two methods of psychometric calibration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2), 192–206.
Hivon, M., Leboux, P., Denis, J.-L., & Rock, M., (2010). Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science? Public Understanding Science, 19, 34-51.
Hofer, B. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405.
Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B.K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55.
Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In K. Harris (Ed.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 225-254). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
Hofer, B., & Sinatra, G. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition Learning, 5(1), 113-120.
Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 292-311.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
King, P., & Kitchener, K. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5-18.
Kienhues, D., Stadler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the web: When expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21, 193-204.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kline, B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Quilford Press.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328.
Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435-451.
Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
Kolstø, S.D. (2006). Patterns in Students Argumentation Confronted with a Risk – focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1689 - 1716.
Kolstø, S.D, Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A., & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632-655.
Kyza, E. A., Constantinou, C. P., & Spanoudis, G. (2011). Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: Exploring relationships between grouping, reflective scaffolding, and evidence based explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2489–2525.
Limón, M. (2006). The domain generality-specificity of epistemological beliefs: A theoretical problem, a methodological problem or both? International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1-2), 7-27.
Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004) Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 103–128.
Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492-509.
Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: a cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79.
Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: the interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291-311.
Metallidou, P. (2012). Epistemological beliefs as predictors of self-regulated learning strategies in middle school students. School Psychology International, 34(3), 283-298.
Muis, Κ., (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: Examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 177-208.
Muis, K., & Franco, G. (2010). Epistemic profiles and metacognition: support for the consistency hypothesis. Metacognition Learning, 5, 27-45.
Muis, K., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168-183.
Muis, K.R., Bendixen, D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3-54.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Richardson, J. (2013). Epistemological development in higher education. Educational Research Review, 9(1), 191-206.
Robert, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Robert, R., & Gott, R., (2010). Questioning the evidence for a claim in a socio-scientific issue: an aspect of scientific literacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 203-226.
Sadler, T.D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89, 71-93.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435–443.
Schommer-Aikins M., Mau W. C., Brookhart S., & Hutter R.. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 120–127.
Shelvin, M., Miles, J., Davies, M., Walker, S. (2000). Coefficient alpha: A useful indicator of reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 229-237.
Sonnett, J., (2010). Climates of risk: A field analysis of global climate change in US media discourse, 1997-2004. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 698-716.
Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological belief. Learning and Instruction, 17, 773-785.
Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 255-281.
Strømsø, H.I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self –regulation of internet-based learning. Metacognition Learning, 5, 91-111.
Strømsø, H.I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple-text comprehension among upper secondary students. Educational Psychology, 29, 425-445.
Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M.A (2011). Do students’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgement of texts’ trustworthiness? Educational Psychology, 31, 177-206.
Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371-400.
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L., & Howes, E.V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues in education. Science Education 89, 357-377.
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B.E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 74-101.
Zeidler, D.L., Walker, K.A., Ackett, W.A., & Simmons, M.L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.
Μπάιτελμαν, Α. (2015). Διερεύνηση της επίδρασης των επιστημολογικών πεποιθήσεων και της προϋπάρχουσας γνώσης στον άτυπο συλλογισμό προϋπηρεσιακών εκπαιδευτικών στο πλαίσιο διαχείρισης κοινωνικο-επιστημονικών ζητημάτων (Διδακτορική διατριβή). Λευκωσία: Πανεπιστήμιο Κύπρου.
Σταθοπούλου, Χ. Β. (2006). Διερεύνηση της σχέσης ανάμεσα στη σχετική με τη φυσική προσωπική επιστημολογία και τη μάθηση της φυσικής (Αδημοσίευτη Διδακτορική Διατριβή). Αθήνα: Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών.
