Αξιολόγηση της επίδοσης των μαθητών σε συνεργατικά περιβάλλοντα μάθησης μέσω εμπλουτισμένων ρουμπρικών
Περίληψη
Οι εκπαιδευτικοί ολοένα και πιο συχνά σχεδιάζουν και εφαρμόζουν στην καθημερινή εκπαι-δευτική πρακτική πολύπλοκα διαδραστικά σενάρια μάθησης ακολουθώντας τυποποιημένεςσυνεργατικές στρατηγικές (π.χ. συναρμολόγηση (jigsaw), πυραμίδα (pyramid) κλπ). Η αποτε-λεσματική και αξιόπιστη αξιολόγηση της επίδοσης των μαθητών που εμπλέκονται σε σύνθετασυνεργατικά διαδικτυακά σενάρια μάθησης είναι ένα δύσκολο και πολύπλοκο θέμα. Αποτελεί,δε, ένα από τα σημαντικά σύγχρονα ζητήματα προβληματισμού και έρευνας της εκπαιδευτι-κής και ακαδημαϊκής κοινότητας. Η παρούσα εργασία σκοπεύει: α) να αναδείξει την προστι-θέμενη αξία μίας νέας προτεινόμενης τεχνικής, αυτής των «Εμπλουτισμένων Ρουμπρικών μεΔείκτες Ανάλυσης Αλληλεπίδρασης» και να παρουσιάσει την παιδαγωγική της αξία β) να δεί-ξει με ένα παράδειγμα πώς ο εκπαιδευτικός μπορεί να τις εφαρμόσει στην εκπαιδευτική πρα-κτική και γ) να παρουσιάσει μία πιλοτική έρευνα που είχε σκοπό να διερευνήσει το βαθμόαποδεκτικότητας και ευχρηστίας της προτεινόμενης τεχνικής από εκπαιδευτικούς.
Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
- Πώς να δημιουργήσετε Αναφορές
-
Πετροπούλου Ο., Βασιλικοπούλου Μ., & Ρετάλης Σ. (2009). Αξιολόγηση της επίδοσης των μαθητών σε συνεργατικά περιβάλλοντα μάθησης μέσω εμπλουτισμένων ρουμπρικών. Θέματα Επιστημών και Τεχνολογίας στην Εκπαίδευση, 2(3), 195–214. ανακτήθηκε από https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/thete/article/view/44657
- Τεύχος
- Τόμ. 2 Αρ. 3 (2009)
- Ενότητα
- Articles
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Anastasiades, P. (2009). Interactive videoconferencing and collaborative distance learning for Κ-12 students and Teachers: Theory and practice. NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Andrade, H., (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory in to Practice, 48(1), 12-19.
Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Arter, J. & Chappuis, J. (2009). Creating and recognizing quality rubrics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service
Arvaja, M. (2010). Building understanding of the philosophy of science through immediate and mediated resources. In L. Dirckinck Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 27- 34), Aalborg, Denmark.
Bates, S. & Hardy, J. (2004). An Evaluation of an e-Learning Strategy: Watching the e-Learners Learn. In D.S. Preston, & T.H. Nguyen (Eds.), Virtuality and education: A reader (pp. 77-81), Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Blommel, M., & Abate, A. (2007). A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(4), 1-8.
Bratitsis, T., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2006). Monitoring and Analysing Group Interactions in asynchronous discussions with the DIAS system. In Y. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs & E. Gomez-Sanchez (Eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Groupware, GRIWG2006 (pp. 54-61). Springer Verlag.
Bravo, C., Redondo, A., Verdejo, F., & Ortega, M. (2008). A framework for process-solution analysis in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(11), 812-832.
Buzzetto-More, N., & Alade, A. (2006). Best Practices in e-Assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 251-269.
Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., Daradoumis, T., & Abraham, A. (2008). Efficient interaction analysis for an effective provision of knowledge about the discussion process to CSCL practices. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Collaborative E-Learning Using Computational Grid (pp. 269-274). IEEE Computer Society.
Chalmers, C., & Nason, A. (2003). Developing primary students’ group metacognitive processes in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. Proceedings of the AARE-NZARE 2003 Joint Conference (pp. 1-9). Auckland, Coldstream: AARE.
Chan, C., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Learning, assessment and collaboration in computer-supported environments. In. P. Dillenbourg, J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Eds.), Computersupported collaborative learning: What we Know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 87-112). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., & Grigoriadou, M. (2005). Analysing learner interaction in an adaptive communication tool. Retrieved 20 September 2009, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.124.1749&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Collazos, C., Guerrero, L, Pino, J., Renzi, S., Klobas, J., Ortega, M., Redondo, M., & Bravo, C. (2007). Evaluating collaborative learning processes using system-based measurement. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 257-274.
Daradoumis, T., Martínez Α., & Xhafa, F. (2006). A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 64(7), 622-635.
Den Hengst, M., Dean, D., Kolfschoten, G., Chakrapani, A., (2006). Assessing the quality of collaborative processes. Proceedings of the 39th Annual HICCS Conference, HICCS 2006 (Vol. 1, 16b). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos.
Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, J. (2007). Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(1), 496-514.
Dimitracopoulou, A. (2004). State of the art on interaction analysis: Interaction analysis indicators, ICALTS JEIRP Deliverable D.26.1. Kaleidoscope network of excellence, Retrieved 10 July 2004, from www.rhodes.aegean.gr/LTEE/kaleidoscope-icalts.
Elliott, C. (2003). Clear expectations, improved outcomes: using rubrics. Journal of School Libraries Association of Victoria, Spring, 4-7.
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1509-1528.
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Hodgson, V., Asensio, M., & Steeples, C. (2004). Undergraduate students’ experiences of networked learning in UK higher education: A survey-based study. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (pp. 91–121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Juan, Α., Daradoumis, Τ., Faulin, J., & Xhafa, F. (2008). Developing an information system for monitoring student's activity in online collaborative learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS-2008) (pp. 270-275). Barcelona: IEEE Computer Society.
Kahrimanis, G., Papasalouros, A., Avouris, N., & Retalis, S. (2006). A model for interoperability in computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 51-55). IEEE Computer Society.
Law, N. (2005). Assessing learning outcomes in CSCL settings. Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years (pp. 373-377). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2009). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education (accepted for publication).
Macdonald, J., (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education, 40, 377-391.
Martínez, A. Dimitriadis, Y., & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Interaction analysis for formative evaluation in CSCL. In M. Llamas, M.J. Fernandez, & L.E. Anido (Eds.), Computers and education: Towards of lifelong learning society (pp. 227-238). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Mazza, R. (2004). Using information visualisation to facilitate instructors in web-based distance learning. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Lugano.
Mazza, R.. & Dimitrova, V. (2005). Generation of graphical representations of student tracking data in course management systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Visualisation, IV'05 (pp. 253-258). IEEE Computer Society.
Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computersupported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86.
Mertler, A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(25), Retrieved 10 September, 2009, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25
Moore, G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Pena-Shaff, J., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 243-265.
Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Sarti, L. (2009). A model for monitoring and evaluating CSCL. In A.A.Juan, T. Daradoumis, F. Xhafa, S. Caballe & J. Faulin (Eds.), Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-learning Support (pp. 149-170). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
Petkov, D., & Petkova, O. (2006). Development of scoring rubrics for IS projects as an assessment tool. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Education, 3, 499-510.
Petropoulou, O., Lazakidou, G., Retalis, S., & Vrasidas, C. (2007). Analysing interaction behaviour in network supported collaborative learning environments: A holistic approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 450-464.
Petropoulou, O., Vassilikopoulou, M., & Retalis, S. (2009). Enriched assessment rubrics: a new medium for enabling teachers to easily assess student’s performance when participating in complex interactive learning scenarios. Operational Research: An International Journal. Springer, Berlin, available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/22t43hh637q26617/fulltext.pdf
Saltz, J., Hiltz, S., Turoff, M., & Passerini, K. (2007). Increasing participation in distance learning courses. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(3), 36-44.
Spada, H., Meier, A., Rummel, N., & Hauser, S. (2005). A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the CSCL 2005: The Next Ten Years! (pp. 622-631). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Stevens, D., &. Levi, A. (2006). Introduction to rubrics: an assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland.
Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2009). Incorporating assessment in a pattern-based design process for CSCL scripts, Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1028-1039.
Voogt, J., & Knezek, G. (2008). IT in primary and secondary education: emerging issues. In J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. xxix-xlii), New York: Springer.
Zinn, C., & Scheuer, O. (2006). Getting to Know your Student in Distance-Learning Contexts. Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2006), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 4227 (pp. 437-451). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Κουλουμπαρίτση, Χ., & Ματσαγγούρας, Η. (2004). Φάκελος εργασιών του μαθητή (portfolio assessment): Η αυθεντική αξιολόγηση στη διαθεματική διδασκαλία. Στο Π. Α. Αγγελίδης & Γ. Γ. Μαυροειδής (επιμ.), Εκπαιδευτικές Καινοτομίες για το Σχολείο του Μέλλοντος (σ. 55-83). Αθήνα: Τυπωθήτω.
Μπρατίτσης, Θ. (2007). Ανάπτυξη ευέλικτων υποστηρικτικών εργαλείων, ασύγχρονων συζητήσεων, μέσω ανάλυσης αλληλεπιδράσεων μεταξύ συμμετεχόντων, για τεχνολογικά υποστηριζόμενη εκπαίδευση. Διδακτορική Διατριβή, Τμήμα Επιστημών της Προσχολικής Αγωγής και του Εκπαιδευτικού Σχεδιασμού, Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου.
Σάμψων, Δ. (2008). Υλικό διαλέξεων μαθήματος ΗΜ01 Διδακτικά Μοντέλα και Εκπαιδευτικός Σχεδιασμός. Μεταπτυχιακό Πρόγραμμα «Διδακτική της Τεχνολογίας & Ψηφιακών Συστημάτων», Πανεπιστήμιο Πειραιά.
