Care and Empathy as a Crucial Quality for Social Change


Published: Dec 31, 2022
Keywords:
empathy ethics of care human nature global consciousness ethical awareness
Darija Rupčić Kelam
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-1410
Ivica Kelam
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-0314
Abstract

Suppose the contemporary man of the 21st century puts under control one of the most significant issues of humankind, like the shortage of food or hunger, epidemics of contagious diseases, and wars. Then remains the question which man first encountered at the dawn of the third millennium; it is a question of what to do with yourself. This question becomes extremely important if we consider biotechnology and information technology’s immense growing power. What to do with so much power? Nevertheless, the most obvious question is whether a man has become better and more moral, empathetic and caring than he was. What seems to concern contemporary man includes happiness, divinity, and ultimately his improvement as a moral agent and his immortality. We will try to answer these and many other questions through the paradigm of ethics of care, closely related to the question of empathy. The paper will discuss and highlight empathy and care as crucial means for social change. Therefore, the main aim of such ethics is to alleviate human suffering and anxiety and promote human well-being and happiness. Can care, compassion, and empathy ethics provide us with some answers and become a path to a more moral world?

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Darija Rupčić Kelam, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia

Department of Philosophy

assistant professor

Ivica Kelam, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia
Head of the Croatia Osijek Unit of International Chair in Bioethics Head of the Centre of Integrative Bioethics at Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek Head of the Department of Philosophy and History  associate professor
References
Bubeck, Demiut. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Churchland, Patricia S. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Universitiy Press, 2012.
Davis, Mark H. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.
Edkins, Jenny. “Legality with Vengeance: Famines and Humanitarian Relief in ‘Complex Emergencies.’” Millenium: Journal of International Studies 25, no. 3 (1996): 547-575.
Fitzpatrick, Toni. “The Nature of Nature: Aristotle versus Epicurus.” In International Handbook on Social Policy and the Enviroment, edited by Toni Fitzpatrick, 419-450. Cheltenham, and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2014.
Fortenbaugh, William. “The Pseudo-Aristotelian Problems on Sympathy.” In Emotions in the Classical World: Methods, Approaches, and Directions, edited by Douglas Cairns, and Damien Nelis, 125-142. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2017.
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tommorrow. London: Vintage, 2017.
Held, Virginia. “Shaping Feminist Culture.” In Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics, edited by Virginia Held, 122-134. Chicago, and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Held, Virginia. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Jebari, Karim. “What to Enhance: Behaviour, Emotion or Disposition?” Neuroethics 7, no. 3 (2014): 253-261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-014-9204-5.
Konstan, David, Diskin Clay, Clarence E. Glad, Johan C. Thom, and James Ware, eds. Philodemus: On Frank Criticism. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1998.
Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. “Getting Moral Enhancement Right: The Desirability of Moral Bioenhancement.” Bioethics 27 (2013): 124-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01907.x.
Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. “The Perils of Cognitive Enhacement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25, no. 3 (2008): 162-177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x.
Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. Unit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. Order out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.
Rifkin, Jeremy. The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. New York: Penguin Books, 2009.
Robinson, Fiona. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Ruddick, Sara. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.
Sinaci, Maria. “Neuroethics and Moral Enhancement: The Path to a Moral World?” In Ethics of Emerging Biotehnologies: From Educating the Young to Engineering Posthumans, edited by Sinaci Maria, and Sorgner Stefan Lorenz, 35-52. New York: Trident Publishing, 2018.
Titchener, Edward Bradford. Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought Processes. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1909.
Tronto, Joan C. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, 1993.
White, Leslie A. The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. New York: Grove Press Inc., 1949.
Wilson, Edward O. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
Yapijakis, Christos. “Ancestral Concepts of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine in Epicurean Philosophy.” In History of Human Genetics: Aspects of Its Development and Global Perspectives, edited by Heike I. Petermann, Peter S. Harper, and Susanne Doetz, 41-57. Cham: Springer, 2017.
Most read articles by the same author(s)