The ethical and legal dilemmas of Telepsychiatry

pdf
Published: Apr 9, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/bioeth.37389
Keywords:
bioethics telepsychiatry telemedicine psychiatry mental health
Maria Chatzi
University of Crete, Greece; National Commission for Bioethics and Technoethics, Greece
Abstract

This paper was written in the framework of my internship at the National Commission for Bioethics and Technoethics of the Hellenic Republic. It constitutes an attempt at exploring the ethical and legal dilemmas of the medical practice of telepsychiatry. Telepsychiatry, as well as other forms of telemedicine, has become a prevalent way through which patients gain access to healthcare and with many research papers reporting on its effectiveness and advantages, telepsychiatry has gained a lot of proponents in the scientific and healthcare community. However, several questions regarding the ethical and legal nature of the practice remain unanswered and this can put patients and other users of telemental health services under risk for basic rights violations. In this paper, at first the scientific data supporting the use of telepsychiatry will be cited. In addition to that, there will be discussion of several ethical dilemmas that have been reported concerning the use of telemedicine in psychiatry during the past few years and there will be reference to the medical code of ethics. Following that, there will be reference to the existing legislation for telepsychiatry in Greece and the legal issues that can arise will be analyzed. In spite of the fact that the advantages and ethical pitfalls of telepsychiatry are common in many countries, the focus of this paper will be on Greece’s code of medical ethics and legislation due to the lack of relevant bibliography on the matter, even though telepsychiatry is widely used by Greek patients. Finally some suggestions will be made on what ought to be ameliorated in regards to the current conditions, so as to make sure telepsychiatry is in line with the basic principles of bioethics.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Reviews
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution  CC BY 4.0 License, which allows for immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. Appropriate credit must be given by citing the author(s) and the original publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

We encourage authors to deposit their articles, as well as data underlying the publications, in institutional and/or other appropriate subject repositories.

Bioethica permits and encourages authors to archive the final publication pdf  in institutional (e.g. the repository of the National Hellenic Research Foundation) or other appropriate subject repositories (e.g. SSOAR repository for social sciences),  in compliance with institutional and/or funder open access policies, after publication in the BIOETHICA. Authors must provide bibliographic details that credit publication in the journal, as well as related funding details (when applicable).

Lists of institutional and other subject-based academic open access repositories can be found listed by country at the registry http://opendoar.org/countrylist.php   

If your institution does not possess a repository you may deposit a copy of your paper at no cost with www.zenodo.org , the repository supported for open access research in the EU by the European Commission, through the project OpenAIRE (www.openaire.eu )

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Jagarapu J., Savani R.C. A Brief history of telemedicine and the evolution of teleneonatology. Seminars in Perinatology 2021, Vol 45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151416.
Field MJ. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. 1, Introduction and Background. National Academies Press (US), Washington(DC) 1996. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45440/.
Jafarzadeh F, Rahmani F, Azadmehr F, Falaki M, Nazari M. Different applications of telemedicine - assessing the challenges, barriers, and opportunities- a narrative review. J Family Med Prim Care 2022, 11: 879-886. Available at https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjfmpc.jfmpc_1638_21.
Mechanic OJ, Persaud Y, Kimball AB. Telehealth Systems. StatPearls Publishing 2023. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459384/.
Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Eysenbach G, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010, 4: 666-84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681000400323.
Chakrabarti S. Usefulness of telepsychiatry: A critical evaluation of videoconferencing-based approaches. World J Psychiatry 2015, 5: 286-304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5498%2Fwjp.v5.i3.286.
Robeznieks A. Which medical specialties use telemedicine the most? AMA 2019. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/which-medical-specialties-use-telemedicine-most.
O'Brien M, McNicholas F. The use of telepsychiatry during COVID-19 and beyond. Ir J Psychol Med 2020, 37: 250-255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017%2Fipm.2020.54.
National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness-Statistics. Available at: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness.
Greenhalgh T., Wherton, J. Telepsychiatry: Learning from the pandemic. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2022, 220: 257-261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.224.
Crumb L., Mingo T.M, Crowe A. “Get over it and move on”: The impact of mental illness stigma in rural, low-income United States populations. Mental Health & Prevention 2019, 13: 143-148. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.010.
Stoll J., Muller J.A., Trachsel M. Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993.
Gude J., R.V. Subhedar, Zhang M.H, Jain P., Bhela J., Bangash F., Veluri N., Hsieh Y-C., Sheikh B.Z., Shah M.R., Mansuri Z., Aedma K., Patel U.K, Parikh T. Emerging Needs and Viability of Telepsychiatry During and Post COVID-19 Era: A Literature Review. Cureus 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.16974.
Moore BJ, Liang L. Costs of Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2017. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet] 2020. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 2006, Statistical Brief #268. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/nbk566654/.
Sharma G., Devan K. The effectiveness of telepsychiatry: thematic review. J Psych Bull 2023, 47: 82–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.115.
Malhotra S., Chakrabarti S., Shah R. Telepsychiatry: Promise, potential, and challenges. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 2013, 55: 3-11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103%2F0019-5545.105499.
Prakash B. Patient Satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010, 3: 151–155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.74491.
Jones BN 3rd. Telepsychiatry and geriatric care. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2001, 3: 29-36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-001-0068-0.
DeYoung N, Shenal BV. The reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment using telehealth in a rural setting with veterans. J Telemed Telecare 2019, 25: 197-203. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x17752030.
Elie-Lefebvre C, Schuster JP, Limosin F. Telepsychiatry: what role in the care of the elderly? Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 2016, 14: 325-31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2016.0625.
Smith KA, Howard LM, Vigod SN, D'Agostino A, Cipriani A. Perinatal mental health and COVID-19: Navigating a way forward. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2023, 57: 937-943. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221137819.
Worley LLM, Wise-Ehlers A. Telepsychiatry in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2020, 47: 333-340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.009.
Kamma H.K., Alabbas M., Elashahab M., Abid N., Manaye S., Cheran K., Murthy C., Bornemann E.A., Arcia Franchini A.P. The Efficacy of Telepsychiatry in Addiction Patients: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2023, 15: e38133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.38133.
Deslich SA, Thistlethwaite T, Coustasse A. Telepsychiatry in correctional facilities: using technology to improve access and decrease costs of mental health care in underserved populations. Perm J 2013, 17: 80-86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7812%2FTPP%2F12-123.
Kaftarian, E. Lessons Learned in Prison and Jail-Based Telepsychiatry. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019, 21: 15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1004-5.
Yellowlees P, Burke MM, Marks SL, Hilty DM, Shore JH. Emergency telepsychiatry. J Telemed Telecare 2008, 14: 277-81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2008.080419.
Varkey B. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Med Princ Pract 2021, 30(1): 17–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th edition). Oxford University Press 2013.
Stoll J, Sadler J.Z., Trachsel M. The Ethical Use of Telepsychiatry in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry 2020, 11: 665. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2020.00665.
Solimini R., Busardò F.P, Gibelli F., Sirignano A., Ricci G. Ethical and Legal Challenges of Telemedicine in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021, 57(12): 1314. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121314.
Mehta S. J. Telemedicine’s Potential Ethical Pitfalls. AMA Journal of Ethics 2014, 16: 1014-1017. Available at: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.12.msoc1-1412.
Cowan A., Johnson R., Close H. Telepsychiatry in Psychotherapy Practice. Innov Clin Neurosci 2020, 17: 23–26. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7413331/
Ftouni R, AlJardali B, Hamdanieh M, Ftouni L, Salem N. Challenges of Telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022, 22: 207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01952-0.
Stubbe D. E. The Therapeutic Alliance: The Fundamental Element of Psychotherapy. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2018, 16: 402–403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20180022.
Soldevila-Matias P., Guillén A.I., Filippis R. Editorial: Mental health and internalized stigma in people with severe mental illness Front. Psychiatry 2023, Volume 14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204091.
Dalal PK. Consent in psychiatry - concept, application & implications. Indian J Med Res 2020, 151: 6–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fijmr.IJMR_1518_19.
Code of Medical Ethics(Greek). Law number 3418/2005. https://www.isathens.gr/images/entypa/KWDIKAS-IATRIKHS-DEONTOLOGIAS.pdf.
Gowda G.S., Enara A., Ali F., Gowda M.R., Basavarajappa C., Kumar C.N., Math S.B. Approach to Informed Consent in Telepsychiatric Service: Indian Perspective. Indian J Psychol Med 2020, 42(5 Suppl): 16S–22S. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0253717620959781.
Uscher-Pines L, Sousa J, Raja P, Mehrotra A, Barnett ML, Huskamp HA. Suddenly becoming a "Virtual Doctor": experiences of psychiatrists transitioning to telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatr Serv 2020, 71: 1143-1150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000250.
DIKE C.C. Telehealth Issues: Be Vigilant About Ethics Breaches. Psychiatric News- American Psychiatric Association Publishing 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2022.08.8.49.
Telemedicine in Greece(translated from Greek). Ministry of Health 2018. Available at: https://www.moh.gov.gr/articles/ehealth/6084-h-thleiatrikh-sthn-ellada.
Issue: “Recommendations for the provision of medical services at a distance”(translated from Greek). Panhellenic Medical Association 2020. Available at: https://pis.gr/.
Law no 4865/2021 (FEK A 238 - 04.12.2021) Composition and organization of a legal entity of private law with the appellation “National Central Authority of health supplies”, strategy of central supplies of products and health services and other urgent provisions for the domains of public health and welfare. Available at: https://www.forin.gr/laws/law/4069/n-4865-2021#!/?article=50290 (source in Greek).
Article 9: “Processing of special categories of personal data”. EU General Data Protection Regulation. Available at: https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/el/9.htm (source in Greek).
Opinion of the Legal service of the Panhellenic Medical Association for Telepsychiatry. ESPY 2020. Available at: https://www.espy.org.gr/el/ (source translated from Greek).
Tzermias C. Need for telemedicine legislation in Greece. Online publication 2021. (Source translated from Greek).