The refugee settlement and the ethnic and spatial homogenisation of Greek Thrace during the interwar period (1922-1930)
Abstract
The population exchanges between Bulgaria and Greece and Turkey
and Greece during the early 1920s functioned as an excellent opportunity
for the rival Balkan states to meet the doctrines of nation-state
formation. In this specific case Greek Thrace is investigated as a province
with a historically formed ethnic composition that questioned the
attempts of the Greek authorities to establish their national dominance,
semiological representation and function.
Under the urgency of the refugees’ presence the Greek state put
into operation a massive colonisation and homogenisation project aiming
to unbalance the regional ethnic diversity, to restrict the minority
semiological representation, to link and administer local institutional
(communal and municipal) and governmental bodies with the national
ones and to regulate the Thracian landscape according to the national
archetype.
Seizures, requisitions, appropriations and redemptions of movable
and immovable properties were the key tools adopted by a network of
state institutions and the dominant group members themselves. During
an eight-year period the colonisation and homogenisation project
achieved an ambiguous implementation and introduced a new revised
project under the latest diplomatic developments between the Balkan
states.
Extensive archival resources and various published materials have
been elaborated in an attempt to reveal the utility of space as a fundamental
tool towards the accomplishment of the incorporation of a newly
annexed ethnically diverse province into a nation-state.
and Greece during the early 1920s functioned as an excellent opportunity
for the rival Balkan states to meet the doctrines of nation-state
formation. In this specific case Greek Thrace is investigated as a province
with a historically formed ethnic composition that questioned the
attempts of the Greek authorities to establish their national dominance,
semiological representation and function.
Under the urgency of the refugees’ presence the Greek state put
into operation a massive colonisation and homogenisation project aiming
to unbalance the regional ethnic diversity, to restrict the minority
semiological representation, to link and administer local institutional
(communal and municipal) and governmental bodies with the national
ones and to regulate the Thracian landscape according to the national
archetype.
Seizures, requisitions, appropriations and redemptions of movable
and immovable properties were the key tools adopted by a network of
state institutions and the dominant group members themselves. During
an eight-year period the colonisation and homogenisation project
achieved an ambiguous implementation and introduced a new revised
project under the latest diplomatic developments between the Balkan
states.
Extensive archival resources and various published materials have
been elaborated in an attempt to reveal the utility of space as a fundamental
tool towards the accomplishment of the incorporation of a newly
annexed ethnically diverse province into a nation-state.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Κουτσούκος Β. (2015). The refugee settlement and the ethnic and spatial homogenisation of Greek Thrace during the interwar period (1922-1930). Bulletin of the Centre for Asia Minor Studies, 19, 161–190. https://doi.org/10.12681/deltiokms.325
- Issue
- Vol. 19 (2015)
- Section
- Workshop
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.