Creativity, Counterpublics and Çapulcu [looters] Cosmopolitics in Beyoǧlu (Istanbul)


Published: Jan 16, 2018
Keywords:
Istanbul creative city counterpublics authoritarian rule new Islamist ethics Ҫapulcu cosmopolitics
Fotini Tsibiridou
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-3768
Abstract

The Gezi exodus in 2013 challenges us to examine retrospectively the synthesis and the dynamics of the main actors of the Gezi protest who were discriminated against after being characterized as ‘Çapulcu’ (looters) by R.T. Erdoğan. Since 2008, systematic ethnographic fieldwork has been conducted among feminist activists, artists, architects, writers and academics in the broader area of Beyoǧlu, the modern heart of the current Global city of Istanbul. It is this ethnographic fieldwork that permits us to study the broader practices, aesthetics and agency of ‘counterpublics’. These ethnographic encounters with the local critical voices producing reflexive ‘texts’ directed the focus of the study presented in this paper on the impact of the cultural turn as priority for social protests, i.e. identities’ activism and artistic creativity in interaction with broader counter-publics. The latter seems to correspond with authoritarian rule, Islamist conservative ethics, fantasies and governmental police control technologies, applied in accordance to the neoliberal projects of gentrification and Istanbul’s transformation into a creative city since the end of the 20th century. Pamuk’ project, The Museum of Innocence, a case study on which this paper focuses, describes ironically and metonymically the process of transformation of dynamic counterpublics into significant looters’ (Ҫapulcu) cosmopolitics.


Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Fotini Tsibiridou, University of Macedonia
Phd in Ethnology and Social Anthropology, Professor, University of Macedonia
References
Agathangelou, A. M. and Soguk, N. (eds) (2013). Arab revolutions and world transformations. London: Routledge.
Arat, Y. (2004). Rethinking the political: A feminist journal in Turkey, Pazartesi. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, pp. 281– 292.
Aksoy, A. and Robins, K. (2011). Changing urban cultural governance in Istanbul: The Beyoğlu plan. KPY Working Paper 1. Retrieved 30 April 2013, from http://bilgikpy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/KPYWP1aksoyRobins.pdf
Albera, D. and Fliche, B. (2012). Muslim devotional practices in Christian shrines: The case of Istanbul. In D. Albera and M. Couroucli (eds), Sharing sacred spaces in the Mediterranean. Christians, Muslims, and Jews at shrines and sanctuaries (pp. 94-117). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Atasoy, Y. (2009). Islam’s marriage with Neoliberalism. State transformation in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baykan, A. and Hatuka, T. (2010). Politics and culture in the making of public space: Taksim Square, 1 May 1977, Istanbul. Planning Perspectives, 25 (1), pp. 49-68.
Bakhtin, M. (1941). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. New York: The Basic Books.
Checker, M. (2009). Anthropology in the public sphere, 2008: Emerging trends and significant impacts. American Anthropologist, 111 (2), pp. 162-169.
Ҫolak E. (2014). Art in the street: The significant role of using the art, literature and humor in the Gezi resistance. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 7(4), pp. 463-476.
De Angellis, M. (2010). The production of the commons and the ‘explosion’ of the middle class. Antipode, 42 (4), pp. 954-977.
De la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond politics. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (2), pp. 334–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.14506/
Derviş, P. (2014). Places of memory. Istanbul/Venice.
Derviş, P., Tanju, B. and Tanyeli U. (eds) (2008). Becoming Istanbul: An encyclopedia. İstanbul/Frankfurt: Garanti Gallery and Deutsches Architekturmuseum.
Dokmeci, V., Altunbas, U. and Yazgi, B. (2007). Revitalisation of the main street of a distinguished old neighbourhood in Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 15 (1), pp. 153-166.
Durmaz, S. B. (2015). Analyzing the quality of place: Creative clusters in Soho and Beyoğlu. Journal of Urban Design, 20 (1), pp. 93-124, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972348
Farmer, F. (2013). After the public turn: Composition, counterpublics, and the citizen bricoleur. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Foucault, M. (1982). Subject and power. Critical Inquire, 8 (4), pp. 777-795.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice Interruptus. New York: Routledge.
Gibb, R. (2001). Toward an Αnthropology of social movements. Journal des Αnthropologues, 85-86, pp. 233-253.
Göktürk, D., Soysal, L. and Türeli, I. (eds) (2010). Orienting Istanbul. Cultural capital of Europe?. London and New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities, London: Verso.
Herzfeld, M. (1997). Portrait of a Greek Imagination: An ethnographic biography of Andreas Nenedakis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hoyng, R. (2014). Place brands, nonbrands, tags and queries: The networks of urban activism in the creative city Istanbul. Cultural Studies, 28 (3), pp. 494–517.
Jale, E. (2010). Art in Istanbul: Contemporary spectacles and history revisited. In D. Göktürk, L. Soysal and I. Türeli (eds), Orienting Istanbul. Cultural capital of Europe? (pp. 216-233). London and New York: Routledge.
Johnston, J. (2000). Pedagogical guerrillas, armed democrats, and revolutionary counterpublics: Examining paradox in the Zapatista Uprising in Chiapas Mexico. Theory and Society, 29 (4), pp. 463-505.
Keyder, C. (ed). (1999). Istanbul. Between the Global and the Local, New York / Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield Pub. Inc.
Kohn, M. (2001). The power of place: The house of the people as counterpublic. Polity, 33(4), pp. 503-526.
Komins, B. (2002). Cosmopolitanism depopulated: The cultures of integration, concealment and evacuation in Istanbul. Comparative Literature Studies, 39 (4), pp. 360-385.
Latour, B. (2004). Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10 (3), pp. 450-462. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/92-BECK_GB.pdf
Lelandais, G., E. (2013). Citizenship, minorities and the struggle for a right to the city in Istanbul. Citizenship Studies, 17 (6-7), pp. 817–836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.834134.
Lévi Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage [The Sauvage Mind], Paris, Plon.
Loehwing, M. and Motter, J. (2009). Publics, counterpublics, and the promise of democracy. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 42 (3), pp. 220-241.
Low, S. (2003). Embodied space(s). Anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6 (1), pp. 9-18.
Mukherjee, R. S. (2011). Fragments and fissures: Towards a political anthropology of the global. International Social Science Journal UNESCO, 61 (202), pp. 339-350.
Marcus, G. and Fischer, M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: an experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mills, A. (2010). Streets of memory: Landscape, tolerance and national identity in Istanbul, Athens / London, The University of Georgia Press.
Moore, C. (2010). On cruelty: Literature, aesthetics and global politics. Global Society, 24 (3), pp. 311-329.
Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2002). Faces of the state. Secularism and public life in Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Öktem, Κ. (2011). Angry nation. Turkey since 1989. London: Zed Books.
Özkan, D. (ed.) (2015). Cool Istanbul: Urban enclosures and resistances. Urban Studies, Bielefeld, Transcript Verlang.
Pamuk, O. (2003). Istanbul. Hatiralar ve Şehir [Istanbul. Memories and the city], Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Pamuk, O. (2008). Masumiyet Müzesi [The Museum of Innocence], Istanbul: İletişim.
Parmaksioǧlu, K. (2009). Bobos in Turkey: Manifestations of the Bourgeois Bohemian Lifestyle in Istanbul. MA Thesis, Istanbul, Bohaziçi University.
Poewe, K. (1996). Writing culture and writing fieldwork: The proliferation of experimental and experiential ethnographies. Ethnos, 61 (3-4), pp. 177-206.
Pollock, S., Bhabha, H. K., Breckenridge, C.A. and Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Cosmopolitanisms. Public Culture, 12 (3), pp. 577-589.
Prato, G. B. and Pardo, I. (2013). Urban Anthropology. Urbanities, 3 (2), pp. 80-110.
Proust, M. (1913-1927 [2012]). A la recherche du temps perdu, Coll. Classiques, Paris: Ed. Humanis.
Puchner, M. (2014). Orhan Pamuk's own private Istanbul. Raritan, 33 (3), pp. 97-107.
Rassel, I. A. (ed.) (2014). An innocent city. Modest musings on everyday Istanbul. Istanbul, Koç University-Yapi Kredi Yayinlari.
Rethmann, P. (2013). Imagining political possibility in an age of late liberalism and cynical reason. Reviews in Anthropology, 42, pp. 227-242.
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: Introducing a concept. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Selek, P. (2001). Maskeler Süvariler Gacõlar, Ülker Sokak: Bir Altkültürün Dõşlanma Mekanõ [Masks, Cavaliers, Gacis, Ülker Street: Exclusion place of a subculture]. Istanbul: İstiklal Kitabevi.
Selek, P. (2013). La maison du Bospore. [The House in Bosporus]. Paris: Liana Lévi.
Sharman, R. (1997). The anthropology of aesthetics: A cross-cultural approach. JASO, 28 (2), pp. 177-92.
Sişmek, S. (2004). New social movements in Turkey since 1980. Turkish Studies, 5 (2), pp. 111-139.
Sitrin, M. (2013). Occupy trust: The role of emotion in the new movements. Hot Spots, Cultural Anthropology website, February 14. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/76-occupy-trust-the-role-of-emotion-in-the-new-movements
Starrett, G. (2008). “Authentication and affect: Why the Turks don’t like enchanted counterpublics”, A review essay. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50 (4), pp. 1036-1046.
Stengers, I. (2005). A cosmopolitical proposal. Ιn B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds), Making things public: Αtmospheres of democracy (pp. 994-1003). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tasbasi, K. (2014). Neo Istanbul liberal: A city of capital or a city of culture?. Revista de Comunicaciσn Vivat Academia, XVII NΊ129, pp. 10-33.
Tsibiridou, F. (2014). Social poetics, emotional engagement and cultural critique in Istanbul: When liminality matters in the social movements. Urbanities, 4 (1), pp. 26-44.
Tsibiridou, F. and Palantzas, N. (2016). Becoming Istanbul: A dictionary of the problematics of a changing city; Inside critique of significant cultural meanings. In E. Deltsou and M. Papadopoulou (eds), Changing Worlds and Signs of the Times. Volos: Selected Proceedings from the 10th International Conference of the Hellenic Semiotics Society (pp. 196-205). http://hellenic-semiotics.gr/wp content/uploads/2016/04/15_Changing_Worlds__Signs_of_the_Times_Tsibiridou_Palantzas_196-205.pdf
Tsibiridou, F. and Bartsidis, M. (2016). Dignity as glocal civic virtue: Redefining democracy through cosmopolitics in the era of neoliberal governementality. In S. Alnasseri (ed.), Arab revolutions and beyond. The Middle East and reverberations in the Americas (pp. 31-54). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsibiridou, F (forthcoming 2017). Ethnography of space, creative dissent and reflective nostalgia at the city centre of the global Istanbul. Ιn I. Pardo and G.B. Prato (eds), Handbook on Urban Ethnography.
Tuominen, P. (2013). The clash of values across symbolic boundaries: Claims of urban space in contemporary Istanbul. Cont Islam, 7, pp. 33–51.
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
Watson C. M. (2014). Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and subalternist cosmopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 31, pp. 75-98.
Yanikkaya, B. (2015). Mirror, mirror on the wall. Aysel is the coolest of them all… Ιn D. Ӧzkan (ed.), Cool Istanbul: Urban Enclosures and Resistances (pp. 131-162). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlang.
Yumul, A. (2009). “A prostitute lodging in the bosom of Turkishness’’: Istanbul’s Pera and its representation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 30 (1), pp. 57-72.
Most read articles by the same author(s)