Losers of globalization, losers in representation? The impact of education on unequal policy representation in Europe

PDF
Published: Jan 26, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.33161
Keywords:
representation; inequality; education; Europe; globalization
Emmanouil Tsatsanis
National Centre for Social Research (EKKE)
Ana Maria Belchior
Department of Political Science and Public Policy, ISCTE-IUL (Instituto Universitário de Lisboa)
Abstract

The article focuses on the impact of education on policy representation. It examines degrees of congruence between political elites and citizens on policy preferences across different policy issues, trying to discern whether there is a representation gap between the so-called “winners” and “losers” of globalization in Europe as captured via the proxy measure of educational attainment. Additionally, we examine whether this representation gap, as well as overall levels of congruence, are affected by contextual factors related to the economy and the ideological orientation of governments. Using data from the 2014 European Election Studies and the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey, our findings largely confirm the existence of a representation gap along educational lines. Contextual factors related to the economy present weak or no direct and moderating effects whereas ideologically left-leaning governments accentuate, for the most part, the representation gap between individuals of low and high educational attainment.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aaldering, L. (2017). Political representation and education attainment: Evidence from Netherlands (1994-2010). Political Studies, 65, pp. 4-23.
Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective preferences in democratic politics. Opinion surveys and the will of the people. Cambridge University Press.
Avery, J. M. (2015). Does who votes matter? Income bias in voter turnout and economic inequality in the American States from 1980 to 2010. Political Behavior, 37, pp. 955-976.
Bartels, L. (2008). Unequal democracy. The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton University Press.
Bartels, L. (2015). The social welfare deficit: Public opinion, policy responsiveness, and political inequality in affluent democracies. Paper presented at the 22th International Conference of Europeanists, 8-10 July, Paris, France.
Baumann, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Polity Press.
Belchior, A. M, and Freire, A. (2013). Is party type relevant to an explanation of policy congruence? Catch-all versus ideological parties in the Portuguese case. International Political Science Review, 34 (3), pp. 273-288.
Beramendi, P., and Anderson, C. J. (2008). Income inequality and democratic representation. In P. Beramendi and C. J. Anderson (Εds.), Democracy, inequality, and representation (pp. 3-24). Russell Sage Foundation.
Bohle, D. (2014) Responsible government and capitalism’s cycles. West European Politics, 37 (2), pp. 288-308.
Bornschier, S. (2010). Cleavage politics and the populist right. The new cultural conflict in Western Europe. Temple University Press.
Brunner, E, Ross, S. L., and Washington, E. (2013) Does less income mean less representation?. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5 (2), pp. 53-76.
Card, D., Dustmann, C., and Preston, I. (2012) Immigration, wages, and compositional amenities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10 (1), pp. 78-119.
Coenders, M., and Scheepers, P. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24 (2), pp. 313-343.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
Donnely, M., and Lefkofridi, Z. (2014). Unequal policy responsiveness in Europe. EUI working paper. https://clas.uiowa.edu/polisci/sites/clas.uiowa.edu.polisci /files/donnellylefkofridiAug27(1).pdf.
Enns, P., and Wlezien, C. (Εds.) (2011). Who gets represented?. Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson, R. S. (2015). Income inequality and policy responsiveness. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, pp. 11-29.
Ezrow, L., and Hellwig, T. (2014). Responding to voters or responding to markets? Political parties and public opinion in an era of globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 58, pp. 816-827.
Freire, A., and Belchior, A. (2011). What left and right means to Portuguese citizens. Comparative European Politics, 9, pp. 145-167.
Freire, A., Tsatsanis, E., and Lima, I. (2016). Portugal in times of crisis: value change and policy representation. In M. Voicu, I. C. Mochmann and H. Dülmer (Εds.), Values, economic crisis and democracy (pp.240-276). Routledge.
Giger, N., Rosset, J., and Bernauer, J. (2012). The poor political representation of the poor in a comparative perspective. Representation, 48 (1), pp. 47-61.
Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (5), pp. 778-796.
Gilens, M. (2009). Preference gaps and inequality in representation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42 (2), pp. 335-341.
Gilens, M., and Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12 (3), pp. 564-581.
Golder, M., and Stramski, J. (2010). Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54, pp. 90-106.
Hainmueller, J., and Hiscox, M. (2006). Learning to love globalization: Education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization, 60 (2), pp. 469-498.
Hainmueller, J., and Hiscox, M. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61 (2), pp. 399-442.
Hooghe, L., and Marks, G. (2017). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (1), pp. 109-135.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G., and Wilson, C.J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), pp. 965-989.
Kang, S.-G., and Powell, G. B. (2010). Representation and policy responsiveness: The median voters, election rules, and redistributive welfare spending. Journal of Politics, 72 (4), pp. 1014-1028.
Kelly, N. J., and Enns, P. K. (2010). Inequality and the dynamics of public opinion: the self-reinforcing link between economic inequality and mass preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 54 (4), pp. 855-870.
Knutsen, O. (2007). The decline of social class?. In R. J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of political behavior (pp. 457-480). Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., and Frey, T. (2008). Globalization and its impact on national spaces of competition. In H. Kriesi, E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier and T. Frey (Eds.), West European politics in the age of globalization (pp. 3-22). Cambridge University Press.
Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An Introduction. In S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1-64). The Free Press.
Magalhães, P. (2014). The elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24 (2), pp. 180-202.
Mair, P. (2013). Smaghi versus the parties: Representative government and institutional constraints. In W. Streeck and A. Schafer (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 143-168). Polity Press.
Manin, B., Stokes, S., and Przeworski, A. (1999). Elections and representation. In A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, and B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability and representation (pp. 29-54). Cambridge University Press.
McCall, L., and Manza, J. (2011). Class differences in social and political attitudes in the United States. In G. C. Edwards III, L. R. Jacobs and R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 552-570). Oxford University Press.
Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57 (1), pp. 45-56.
Miller, W. E., Pierce, R., Thomassen, J., Herrera, R., Holmberg, S., Esaiasson, P., and Wessels, B. (1999). Policy representation in western democracies. Oxford University Press.
Mortensen, P. B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., Palau, A. M., and Timmermans, A. (2011). Comparing government agendas: executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44 (8), pp. 973-1000.
Page, B. I., Bartels, L. M., and Seawright, J. (2013). Democracy and the policy preferences of wealthy Americans. Perspectives on Politics, 11 (1), pp. 51-73.
Peters, Y., and Ensink, J. (2015). Differential responsiveness in Europe: The effects of preference difference and electoral participation. West European Politics, 38 (3), pp. 577-600.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twentieth-first century. Belknap/Harvard Press.
Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy. Yale University Press.
Powell, G. B. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, pp. 273-296.
Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: an individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (7), pp. 885-881.
Rigby, E., and Wright G. C. (2013). Political parties and representation of the poor in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57 (3), pp. 552–565.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Why global markets, states and democracy can’t coexist. Oxford University Press.
Rosset, J. (2013). Are the policy preferences of relatively poor citizens under-represented in the Swiss Parliament?. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19 (4), pp. 490-504.
Rosset, J., Giger, N., and Bernauer, J. (2013). More money, fewer problems? Cross-level effects of economic deprivation on political representation. West European Politics, 36 (4), pp. 817-835.
Runciman, D. (2016). How the education gap is tearing politics apart. The Guardian, 5 October. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/05/trump-brexit-education-gap-tearing-politics-apart
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., and Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press.
Soroka, S., and Wlezien, C. (2008). On the limits to inequality in representation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41 (2), pp. 319-327.
Spoon, J.-J., and Klüver, H. (2015). Voter polarization and party responsiveness: Why parties emphasize divided issues, but remain silent on unified issues. European Journal of Political Research, 54 (2), pp. 343-362.
Ura, J. D., and Ellis, C. R. (2008). Income, preferences, and the dynamics of policy responsiveness. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41 (4), pp. 785-794.
Verba, S., Nie, N.H., and Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge University Press.
Wlezien, C., and Soroka, S. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion-policy link. West European Politics, 35 (6), pp. 1407-1432.
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.