The Covid-19 pandemic in Greece through the lens of methodological synergy: Combining corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis approaches

pdf
Published: Jul 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.38498
Keywords:
pandemic, Covid-19, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, political communication
Dimitris Elafropoulos
University of Toulouse
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-6802
Abstract

Computational approaches have been increasingly used in social sciences in recent years. The present study investigates to what extent a triangulated framework of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis can shed light on cutting-edge approaches and offer new insights into social research. Big data sets that may be examined computationally reveal patterns, trends and co-occurrences of elements (Teubert & Krishnamurthy, 2007, p. 6). This research is based on analysing a 720-text corpus of political and scientific discourse (March 2020 - May 2022) of representatives of three main institutions (government, main opposition party, and Greek public health organisation). Mediated political and scientific discourse has been the primary source of information regarding the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. The computational techniques focus on the representation of the pandemic and the relevant collocations and concordances in an attempt to navigate afterwards through qualitative analysis. Findings indicate that the government constructed a ‘‘rescue narrative’’ while the main opposition party advocated working-class priorities. Conceptual metaphors regarding the pandemic were pervasive both in political and scientific discourse. Comparative studies among different countries could be conducted in the future.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Dimitris Elafropoulos, University of Toulouse

Researcher, Laboratoire d'Études et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales

References
Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2017). Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online opinion-page content on climate change: War, religion, and politics. Environmental Communication, 11(4), pp. 452-469.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. John Wiley & Sons.
Biener, L., & Siegel, M. (2000). Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference. American journal of public health, 90(3), p. 407.
Boin, A., Lodge, M., & Luesink, M. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 crisis: an initial analysis of national responses. Policy Design and Practice, 3(3), pp. 189-204.
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge New York.
Chepurnaya, A. (2023). Modeling public perception in times of crisis: discursive strategies in Trump’s COVID-19 discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(1), pp. 70-87.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso Books.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), pp.133-168.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Florea, S., & Woelfel, J. (2022). Proximal versus distant suffering in TV news discourses on COVID-19 pandemic. Text & Talk, 42(3), pp. 327-345.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. routledge.
Hornik, R. (2002). Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. Routledge.
Jaworska, S. (2021). Competence and collectivity: The discourse of Angela Merkel’s media communications during the first wave of the pandemic. Discourse, Context & Media, 42, 100506.
Jones, S. C., & Iverson, D. (2008). What Australians know and believe about bird flu: Results of a population telephone survey. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4_suppl), 73S-82S.
Kalil, I., Silveira, S. C., Pinheiro, W., Kalil, Á., Pereira, J. V., Azarias, W., & Amparo, A. B. (2021). Politics of fear in Brazil: Far-right conspiracy theories on COVID-19. Global Discourse, 11(3), pp. 409-425.
Kasuga, N. (2010). Total social fact: structuring, partially connecting, and reassembling. Revue du MAUSS, 2(36), pp. 101-110.
Kelle, U. (2007). Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung [The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research]. In: Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), pp. 7-36.
Lakoff, G. (2014). The all new don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lawler, J. M., Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Language, 59, 201.
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., & Gutmann, M. (2009). Computational social science. science, 323(5915), pp. 721-723.
Lee, C. (2021). HateIsAVirus: Talking about COVID-19 ‘‘hate’’. Viral discourse, pp. 61-68.
Mbembé, J.-A., & Meintjes, L. (2003). Necropolitics. Public culture, 15(1), pp. 11-40.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2003). Corpus linguistics. The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics, pp. 448-463.
Musolff, A. (2022). ''War against Covid-19'’: Is the pandemic management as war metaphor helpful or hurtful? Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy, 307.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2005). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.
Semino, E. (2021). “Not soldiers but fire-fighters”–Metaphors and Covid-19. Health communication, 36(1), pp. 50-58.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS one, 6(2), e16782.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. Approaches to media discourse, 21(63).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Discourse, power and access. In Texts and practices (pp. 93-113). Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Discourse and power. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse studies, 1(1), pp. 83-118.
Wodak, R. (2019). Entering the ‘post-shame era’: The rise of illiberal democracy, populism and neo-authoritarianism in Europe. Global Discourse, 9(1), pp. 195-213.
Wodak, R. (2021). Crisis communication and crisis management during COVID-19. Global Discourse, 11(3), pp. 329-353.