An algorithm measuring the charisma of Greek journalists

pdf
Published: Jul 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.38504
Keywords:
X, Twitter, charisma, influence, journalists, Analytic Hierarchy Process
Valia Kaimaki
Ionian University
Dimitris Ampeliotis
Ionian University 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-6152
Aggeliki Sgora
Ionian University 
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-6692
Agisilaos Konidaris
Ionian University 
Spyros Polykalas
Ionian University 
Abstract

X, formerly, Twitter is considered a valuable tool for journalists for real-time interaction with their followers. Especially, in the case of political journalists, the degree of their influence and persuasion is of great importance. In this paper, we deal with identifying the journalists’ political charisma. More specifically we propose an algorithm based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process method to measure the political charisma of the journalists. Numerical results in two different use-case scenarios showed that the proposed algorithm could successfully determine charisma in that it tweaks influence towards a more specific political direction.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biographies
Valia Kaimaki , Ionian University

Assistant Professor, Department of Digital Media and Communications

Dimitris Ampeliotis, Ionian University 

Assistant Professor, Department of Digital Media and Communications

Aggeliki Sgora , Ionian University 

Assistant Professor, Department of Digital Media and Communications

Agisilaos Konidaris , Ionian University 

Associate Professor, Department of Digital Media and Communications

Spyros Polykalas, Ionian University 

Professor, Department of Digital Media and Communications

References
Azaouzi, M., & Romdhane, L. (2018). An efficient two-phase model for computing influential nodes in social networks using social actions. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 33, pp. 286-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1820-9
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), pp. 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?. Psychological Science, 26(10), pp. 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2982233). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2982233
Bimber, B., Cunill, M. C., Copeland, L., & Gibson, R. (2015). Digital media and political participation: The moderating role of political interest across acts and over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), pp. 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314526559
Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The Image: A guide to pseudo-events in America (1st Vintage Books Ed edition). Vintage.
Borgatti, S., Mehra, A., Brass, D., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323, pp. 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic capital and social classes. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), pp. 292-302.
Breuilly, J. (2011). Max Weber, charisma and nationalist leadership. Nation and Nationalism, 17(3), pp. 477-499.
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 4(1), pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), pp. 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2021). Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), pp. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14126
Francalanci, C., & Metra, I. (2015). Content-based discovery of twitter influencers. E-Review of Review Tour. Res., 6, pp. 1–5.
de Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), pp. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K. and Yu, P. S. (2007). Anonymizing classification data for privacy preservation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19(5), pp. 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2007.1015
Garg, M., & Kumar, M. (2018). Identifying influential segments from word co-occurrence networks using AHP. Cognitive Systems Research, 47, pp. 28-41.
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), pp. 35–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25621396
Goffman, Erving. (1974). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life: (Overlook Books).
Hermida, A. (2016). Social media and the news. In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 81–94). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957909
House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), pp. 364–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393201
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications (pp. xx, 400). Free Press.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, pp. 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011
Lamirán-Palomares, J. M., Baviera, T., & Baviera-Puig, A. (2020). Sports influencers on Twitter. Analysis and comparative study of Track Cycling World Cups 2016 and 2018. Social Sciences, 9(10), p. 169.
Lee, J. (2015). The double-edged sword: The effects of journalists’ social media activities on audience perceptions of journalists and their news products. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(3), pp. 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12113
Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers?. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), pp. 611-623. doi:10.1111/ajps.12006
McCombs, M. & Valenzuela, S. (2021). setting the agenda: mass media and public opinion, 3rd edition | Wiley (3rd ed.). Wiley.
McQuail, Denis. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mohamaddoust, R., Mohammadzadeh, J., Khalilian, M., & Nikravanshalmani, A. (2021). Measuring and analyzing charisma on X, formely Twitter, using combination weighting and TOPSIS method. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 12 (Special Issue), pp. 1143-1158.
Newman, N. et al. (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. United Kingdom. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf
Oxford University Press (2023, December 4). Rizz crowned Oxford Word of the Year 2023 [Press release]. https://corp.oup.com/news/rizz-crowned-oxford-word-of-the-year-2023/
Pappas, T. S. (2011). Political charisma revisited, and reclaimed for political science. Working Paper. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/19215
Riquelme, F., & González-Cantergiani, P. (2016). Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.003
Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? (pp. 109-121). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Stocking, G., Mitchell, A., Matsa, K. E., Widjaya, R., Jurkowitz, M., Ghosh, Shreenita, Smith, A., Naseer, S., & St. Aubin, Christopher (2022). The role of alternative social media in the news and information environment. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2022/10/06/the-role-of-alternative-social-media-in-the-news-and-information-environment/
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, pp. 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676
Tong, J. (2022). The rise of partisan journalism and the crisis of objective journalism. Journalism, Economic Uncertainty and Political Irregularity in the Digital and Data Era, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-558-220221007
Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
Wettstein, M., Esser, F., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., & Wirth, W. (2018). News Media as gatekeepers, critics, and initiators of populist communication: How journalists in ten countries deal with the populist challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), pp. 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218785979
Zayat, W., Kilic, H. S., Yalcin, A. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2023). Application of MADM Methods in Industry 4.0: A Literature Review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109075.
Δαγουλά, Χ. (2019). Χαρτογράφηση του ελληνικού δημοσιογραφικού Τwitter. Θεωρητική και εμπειρική προσέγγιση (Μεταμεσονύκτιες Εκδόσεις). https://bit.ly/42eL5Gp
Σαπουνά, Ζ. (2022). Το Twitter σε ρόλο πέμπτης εξουσίας. Νησίδες.