Regional development-core-periphery relations: The Greek case


Published: May 1, 1975
Mary Evangelinides
Abstract

An attempt was made in this paper to demonstrate
the process by which regional polarization and development
occur in industrializing countries. The case
of Greece was presented and analyzed as an example
of highly polarized regional development.
In Greece the polarization process actually started
in the 1830s with the emergence of the new modern
Greek nation-state. It was the social change and «institutional
» innovations injected into the system that
transformed the «traditional» socio-economic spatial
structure of the country by attracting innovative personalities;
the country’s élites; and consequently all
economic activities; science; education; and culture
into the enclave of accelerated change, the new capital
Athens, which later became the core region while the
rest of the country was left in a backwater. The core
region started organizing the periphery into dependency
by the gradual neutralization and co-option of
the periphery’s élites; by the creation of an adaptive
system characterized by authority-dependency relations;
and by the penetration and transformation of
the periphery’s social values and institutions in the
direction of greater acceptance and conformity with
its own value system.
The polarization process that started in the 1830s
was later reinforced by the «technical» and «economic
» innovations introduced in the 1950s into the
system. The industrialization of the country was once
again focused around the core region, Athens. But
due to fundamental structural weaknesses in the
country’s economy, the so-called economic «miracle»
of the core region was not based on modern dynamic
industry and productive investment but rather on the
«spread effects» of invisible receipts which in turn
stimulated consumption and construction in the core
region. At the same time the periphery sank deeper
and deeper in backwater and stagnation and never
participated in the core region’s «miracle.»
It is believed that the above process of regional
polarization and development is characteristic of most
industrializing countries where core-periphery relations
are still predominant influences.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Mary Evangelinides, Sussex University

Mary Evangelinides was born in Athens in 1938. She studied
Sociology and Psychology at Deree-Pierce College, Athens
(Bachelor of Arts, 1973) and Urban and Regional Studies at
Sussex University, England (Master of Arts, 1975). She followed
courses in Urban Sociology, Spatial Analysis, Regional
Economics, Regional Policy and Planning in Britain and in Europe
(CEE countries). She is presently a Ph. D. Candidate at
Sussex University and is doing research on regional polarization
and development in developing countries with special reference
to Greece. Some of her other areas of interest and research
are: community development and social planning; social area
analysis; domestic and international migration; criteria affecting
industrial location decisions; the social aspects and effects
that the multi-national companies, operating in Greece,
have on local personnel and population. She worked in various
field projects and community research surveys in Athens and
in Greece. She attended various international conferences in
Greece and Britain and organized an international conference
at Sussex University on Social Planning, Industrial Location
and Housing. Publications: Skyros, the Sociological Image of
an Island. Papers: Community Development versus Community
Action in Britain and France, submitted to Sussex Univ., Social
Area Analysis in the United States, Britain and France,
submitted to Sussex Univ.

Most read articles by the same author(s)