The Positions of Schlick and Carnap on Ethics
Abstract
This article examines the ethical perspectives of Moritz Schlick and Rudolf Carnap, two leading figures of the Vienna Circle and Logical Positivism. The author argues that while the Vienna Circle did not develop a unified system of moral philosophy, their views were shaped by a commitment to "purifying" science from metaphysics through the verification principle. The study contrasts Schlick’s naturalistic approach—which views ethics as a branch of psychology or sociology concerned with the factual motives of human behavior—with Carnap’s more radical stance. Carnap argues that ethical judgments are not meaningful propositions but rather commands or expressions of feeling (emotivism) that cannot be empirically verified. The paper explores how these positions challenged traditional meta-ethics and influenced the shift toward logical analysis of language in the 20th century.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Papadatou, K. (2020). The Positions of Schlick and Carnap on Ethics . Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (4), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.22668
- Issue
- No. 4 (2007)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).