The Distinction Between Friend and Enemy in Carl Schmitt
Abstract
This article provides a critical examination of Carl Schmitt’s political theory, centered on his fundamental criterion for "the political": the distinction between friend and enemy. The author analyzes Schmitt's critique of the Weimar Republic, arguing that the blurring of boundaries between state and society leads to a "quantitative" totalitarianism characterized by weakness and the influence of organized interests. The study explores how Schmitt defines the "enemy" not as a personal rival or a moral antagonist, but as the "existential other" whose presence poses a threat to the community's way of life, thereby necessitating the possibility of physical killing and war. Furthermore, the paper contrasts Schmitt’s vision of a hierarchically ordered state with Liberalism and Marxism, concluding that for Schmitt, the essence of sovereignty lies in the "exception"—the decision-making power that identifies the enemy to preserve the political unity of the state.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Georgakopoulou, T. (2020). The Distinction Between Friend and Enemy in Carl Schmitt . Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (11), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.22758
- Issue
- No. 11 (2017)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).