How does a radical thinker approach the overall history of art?
Abstract
This article explores the unique methodology of Kostas Papaioannou in interpreting the history of art and civilization. The author describes Papaioannou as a "philosopher of difference" and a master of dialectical synthesis, capable of viewing history both from "below"—through the lens of everyday life and the masses—and from "above"—through intellectual and idealistic frameworks. The study examines how Papaioannou treats the work of art as a fusion of material object and immaterial idea, functioning as a teleological "prophet" of a civilization's future. Furthermore, it analyzes his ability to link aesthetic phenomena with political-social developments, particularly in his seminal works on Classical Greece and Byzantium. Ultimately, Stefanidis argues that Papaioannou's profound knowledge of the classical world serves as a "keel and hope" for a modern world adrift, positioning art as a continuous revolutionary and subversive process.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Stefanidis, M. (2023). How does a radical thinker approach the overall history of art? . Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (16-17), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.33679
- Issue
- No. 16-17 (2023)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).