"Discomfort within Utilitarianism": A Freudian Re-evaluation of Millian Eudaemonism
Abstract
This article initiates a systematic dialogue between Freudian cultural theory and ethical philosophy, specifically focusing on the metapsychological re-evaluation of ethical principles that define collective behavior . The author examines "happiness" as a structural element of Utilitarianism, which is often treated as a psychological tendency capitalized normatively to meet the requirements of generalized eudaemonistic education. Using Sigmund Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents as a primary framework alongside John Stuart Mill's utilitarian theory, the paper evaluates the gaps in these ethical approaches regarding the limits set by human drive mechanisms and their cultural performance . The analysis explores the inherent implementation weaknesses of the eudaemonistic ideal, contrasting the philosophical drive toward pleasure with the Freudian recognition of an a priori impossibility of achieving absolute happiness within the constraints of civilization. Ultimately, the study seeks to highlight how ethical welfare depends on the degree to which these psychological movements are realized or restricted by cultural evolution.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Xefloudas, K.-R. (2026). "Discomfort within Utilitarianism": A Freudian Re-evaluation of Millian Eudaemonism. Ηθική. Περιοδικό φιλοσοφίας, (20), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.12681/ethiki.44124
- Issue
- No. 20 (2025)
- Section
- Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).