European response to COVID-19 health crisis

George Nastos
The world is undergoing the pandemic health crisis of COVID-19. First and foremost, the pandemic is causing losses in human lives all over the world. Secondly, it is testing the economies of all countries, regardless of the degree of dispersion and loss of lives between the states. Another consequence of this health crisis is that apart from national health systems, it also puts to the test political systems. This consequence is even greater for an evolving political system such as the European Union, which in a decade has faced two other crises - the Eurozone and the refugee crisis. The EU has once again been called upon to face an exogenous cross-border crisis. It has to confront a pandemic within the existing framework of its competence, tools and bodies, while creating new ones in the need to support its Member States. This paper focuses on the European Union's response to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic, the weaknesses that this crisis has brought to the fore and the policies that would help the EU manage similar crises in the future.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
George Nastos, University of Crete
George Nastos is a Medical Laboratory Scientist (MLS) from the Alexandrian Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki. He has graduated with distinction in Political Science (ΒΑ) from the University of Crete in 2017 and he has obtained his Master's Diploma (M.A.) in Political Analysis and Public and European Policies in 2019.
Anderson, M., Mckee, M. and Mossialos, E. (2020). Covid-19 exposes weaknesses in European response to outbreaks. BMJ, 368: m1075. doi: 10.1136 / bmj.m1075.
Ansell, C., Boin, A. and Keller, A. (2010). Managing Transboundary Crises: Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18: 195-207. doi: 10.1111 / j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x
Boin, A. and Rhinard, M. (2008). Managing Transboundary Crises: What Role for the European Union? International Studies Review, 10 (1): 1–26,
Dayrit, M. and Mendoza, RU (2020). Social Cohesion vs COVID-19. [Online] Available at: or (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
European Commission. (2001). Health Security Committee. [Online] Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
European Commission. (2020). Timeline of EU action. [Online] Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
European Union Law. (2013). Decision No 1082/2013 / EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 2119/98 / EC Text with EEA relevance. [Online] Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
European Union. (2005). European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. [Online] Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
Flear, M., de Ruijter, A. and McKee, M. (2020). Coronavirus shows how UK must act quickly before being shut out of Europe's health protection systems. BMJ. 368: m400.10.1136 / bmj.m400 32005657.
Jordana, J., Triviño ‐ Salazar, J. C. (2020). EU agencies' involvement in transboundary crisis response: Supporting efforts or leading coordination? Public Admin. 1–15.
Pacces, AM and Weimer, M. (2020). “From Diversity to Coordination: A European Approach to COVID-19”. European Journal of Risk Regulation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1017 / err.2020.36.
Pacces, A. and Weimer, M. (2020). We need a European exit strategy for Covid-19 before it's too late. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP). [Online] Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
Palaiologos, G. (2020). Next day’s Europe, Kathimerini, Athens, 17 May. Available at: (Accessed: June 15, 2020).
Renda, A. and Castro, R. (2020). “Towards Stronger EU Governance of Health Threats after the COVID-19 Pandemic”. European Journal of Risk Regulation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1017 / err.2020.34.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)