The European Integration Method After the Eurozone Debt Crisis 2010-2017: Problems and Perspectives
Published:
Jun 29, 2022
Keywords:
European integration Eurozone crisis legitimacy
Abstract
This paper highlights specific perspectives on European integration using theoretical approaches and views on the process of integration in the light of the experience of the Eurozone debt crisis management in 2010-2017. An attempt is made to link the broader political and theoretical debate regarding this issue, the process of European integration, as well as related legitimacy issues. This attempt to link, on the one hand, the debate between decision-makers in the policy field and on the other, European integration theorists, attempts to formulate the context of the prospects, current problems and opportunities regarding European integration.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Alexopoulos, N. (2022). The European Integration Method After the Eurozone Debt Crisis 2010-2017: Problems and Perspectives. HAPSc Policy Briefs Series, 3(1), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.12681/hapscpbs.31011
- Section
- Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alexopoulos, N. (2000). The Commission as Policy Innovator: Bureaucratic Politics in Perspective. Florence: European University Institute.
Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Commission of the European Communities (1990). One Market, One Money. European Economy, 44.
Commission of the European Communities (2001). European Governance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Dornbusch R. (1990). Two track EMU, Now!. In Pohl K.O. et.al (eds). Britain and EMU. London: Center for Economic Performance.
Eichengreen, J. & Frieden, J.A. (1995). The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification: An Analytical Introduction. In Frieden, J. A. and Lake, D. A. (eds.), International Political Economy. London: Routledge: 267-81.
Eichengreen, J. (1990). Costs and Benefits of European Monetary Unification. Discussion Paper no. 453, London Center for Economic Policy Research.
Feldstein, Μ. (1992). Europe’s Monetary Union: The Case Against EMU, The Economist 13 June: 12-2.
Hix S. (1999). The Political System of the European Union. London: The Macmillan Press.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Majone, G. (1993). The European Community between Social Policy and Social Regulation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(2): 153-170.
Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
Majone, G. (2012). Rethinking European Integration after the Debt Crisis. Working Paper No. 3. University College London - The European Institute.
Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4): 473-524.
Scharpf, F. (1988). The joint-decision trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3): 239-278.
Scharpf, F. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Oxford: Westview Press.
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf, F. (2006). The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4): 845–64.
Scharpf, F. (2011). Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy. Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 6, London School of Economics / European Institute.
Tzagkarakis, S. I. (2021). The Role of Federalism in European Integration in the Context of Contemporary Multifaceted Challenges. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(8): 76-80.
Τζαγκαράκης, Σ. Ι., Παππάς, Η. & Κρήτας, Δ. (2021). Πτυχές της κοινωνικής ευπάθειας-ευαλωτότητας στην Ελλάδα την περίοδο της παρατεταμένης πολυδιάστατης κρίσης. Στο: Πανταζής, Σ. Χ. κ.ά, (επιμ.). Πρακτικά 7oυ Διεθνούς Επιστημονικού Συνεδρίου ΙΑΚΕ. Κοινωνική ευαλωτότητα: Προκλήσεις στην εκπαίδευση, την οικονομία και τον πολιτισμό (Α’ Τόμος). Ηράκλειο: Εκδόσεις Ινστιτούτου Ανθρωπιστικών και Κοινωνικών Επιστημών: 244-252.
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, California: University of California Press.
