The Blue Survey: Validation of an instrument to measure ocean literacy among adults
Résumé
Human activities have put the ocean under unprecedented pressure. Still, levels of public understanding about the ocean remain low. Ocean literacy is a global movement that aims to improve the understanding of the ocean and provide an incentive for positive change in people’s behavior. To date, there is no validated scale targeted to adults to measure ocean literacy that includes measuring people’s knowledge about the ocean, as well as surveying their attitudes and willingness to act. The Blue Survey is an online instrument meant to measure ocean literacy in adult populations developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts. Using factor analysis, we explore the validity and internal consistency of the Blue Survey in a purposive online sample of 251 adults. We found ocean literacy to consist of six sub-dimensions captured by 34 survey items, viz. knowledge of ocean-related topics, personal interest in ocean-related aspects, ocean stewardship, ocean as an economic resource, ocean-friendly behavior, and willingness to act responsibly for the ocean. Our analysis resulted in the development of a new validated instrument to measure the various dimensions of ocean literacy. It may help researchers and practitioners to better understand the factors contributing to shaping an ocean-literate person. Further research should assess the validity of the Blue Survey across different populations, including those closely related to the sea, such as maritime professionals.
Article Details
- Comment citer
-
PAREDES-CORAL, E., DEPREZ, T., MOKOS, M., VANREUSEL, A., & ROOSE, H. (2022). The Blue Survey: Validation of an instrument to measure ocean literacy among adults. Mediterranean Marine Science, 23(2), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.26608
- Rubrique
- Special Issue Ocean Literacy
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Références
Ainsworth, G.B., Kenter, J.O., O’Connor, S., Daunt, F., Young, J.C., 2019. A fulfilled human life: Eliciting sense of place and cultural identity in two UK marine environments through the Community Voice Method. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100992.
Ballantyne, R., 2004. Young Students’ Conceptions of the Marine Environment and Their Role in the Development of Aquaria Exhibits. GeoJournal, 60 (2), 159-163.
Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., Ferraz, M.B., 2000. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25 (24), 3186-3191.
Boubonari, T., Markos, A., Kevrekidis, T., 2013. Greek Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Environmental Behavior Toward Marine Pollution. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44 (4), 232-251.
Brennan, C., Ashley, M., Molloy, O., 2019. A System Dynamics Approach to Increasing Ocean Literacy. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6 (360). Cava, F., Schoedinger, S., Strang, C., Tuddenham, P., 2005. Science content and standards for ocean literacy: A report on ocean literacy. 50 pp.
Chen, Y.-F., Cannady, M. A., Fauville, G., Strang, C., 2020. Working toward an international assessment of ocean literacy: Validating instrument with Rasch measurement model. In: American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. https://static1. squarespace.com/static/5970e07ad2b857f9aa5f153f/t/5dbe23e48fc82a626b87dcde/ 1572742118021/IOLS+-+Final+ Version.pdf (Accessed 30 November 2020)
Cudaback, C., 2006. What do college students know about the ocean? Eos, 87, 418-421.
Eddy, T.D., 2014. One hundred-fold difference between perceived and actual levels of marine protection in New Zealand. Marine Policy, 46, 61-67.
Eheazu, C.L., Akpabio, J., 2018. Non-Formal Environmental Adult Education Strategies and Communication Techniques for Addressing Environmental Degradation Challenges Associated with Grassroots Populations in Nigeria. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 5 (2), 52-59.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., 2011. Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, 176 pp. Fauville, G., 2019. Ocean Literacy in the Twenty-First Century. p. 3-11. In: Exemplary Practices in Marine Science Education: A Resource for Practitioners and Researchers. G. Fauville, D. L. Payne, M. E. Marrero, A. Lantz-Andersson, & F. Crouch (Eds). Springer International Publishing.
Fauville, G., Strang, C., Cannady, M. A., Chen, Y.F., 2019. Development of the International Ocean Literacy Survey: measuring knowledge across the world. Environmental Education Research, 25 (2), 238-263.
Fernández Otero, R. M., Bayliss-Brown, G. A., Papathanassiou, M., 2019. Ocean Literacy and Knowledge Transfer Synergies in Support of a Sustainable Blue Economy. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 646.
Fletcher, S., Potts, J. S., Heeps, C., Pike, K., 2009. Public awareness of marine environmental issues in the UK. Marine Policy, 33 (2), 370-375.
Greely, T., 2008. Ocean literacy and reasoning about ocean issues: The influence of content, experience and morality. PhD Thesis. University of South Florida, USA, 250 pp. Kaiser, F.G., Frick, J., Stoll-Kleemann, S., 2001. Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens. Diagnostica, 47 (2), 88-95.
Kaiser, H. F., Rice, J., 1974. Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34 (1), 111-117.
Kelly, R., Evans, K., Alexander, K., Bettiol, S., Corney, S. et al., 2021. Connecting to the oceans: supporting ocean literacy and public engagement. Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 1-21.
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., Eddy, S., 2019. One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Using Factor Analysis to Gather Validity Evidence When Using Surveys in Your Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18 (1), 1-17.
Markos, A., Boubonari, T., Mogias, A., Kevrekidis, T., 2017. Measuring ocean literacy in pre-service teachers: psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Survey of Ocean Literacy and Experience (SOLE). Environmental Education Research, 23 (2).
McKinley, E., Fletcher, S., 2010. Individual responsibility for the oceans? An evaluation of marine citizenship by UK marine practitioners. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53 (7), 379-384.
Mogias, A., Boubonari, T., Markos, A., Kevrekidis, T., 2015. Greek Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge of Ocean Sciences Issues and Attitudes Toward Ocean Stewardship. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46 (4), 251-270.
Mogias, A., Boubonari, T., Realdon, G., Previati, M., Mokos, M. et al., 2019. Evaluating ocean literacy of elementary school students: Preliminary results of a cross-cultural study in the Mediterranean region. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6 (396).
OECD, 2016. The Ocean Economy in 2030. OECD Publishing, Paris, 256 pp.
Potts, T., Pita, C., O’Higgins, T., Mee, L., 2016. Who cares? European attitudes towards marine and coastal environments. Marine Policy, 72, 59-66.
Reise, S.P., Waller, N.G., Comrey, A.L., 2000. Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12 (3), 287- 297.
Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., 2015. The power of interest for motivation and engagement Routledge. 188 pp. Revelle, W., 2020. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. https://cran.r-project. org/package=psych (Accessed 30 November 2020)
Ryabinin, V., Barbière, J., Haugan, P., Kullenberg, G., Smith, N. et al., 2019. The UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 470.
Starkweather, J., 2014. Factor analysis with binary items: A quick review with examples. https://it.unt.edu/sites/default/ files/binaryfa_l_jds_sep2014_0.pdf (Accessed 23 October 2020)
Stone, G., Barnes, J. H., Montgomery, C., 1995. Ecoscale: A scale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 12 (7), 595-612. SurveyMonkey Inc, 2021. San Mateo, California, USA. https:// www.surveymonkey.com (Accessed 15 March 2021).
Tsai, L.-T., Chang, C.-C., 2019. Measuring ocean literacy of high school students: psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the ocean literacy scale. Environmental Education Research, 25 (2), 264-279.
Thomson, W., 1883. Electrical units of measurement. Popular Lectures and Addresses, 1(73).
Umuhire, M. L., Fang, Q., 2016. Method and application of ocean environmental awareness measurement: Lessons learnt from university students of China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 102 (2), 289-294.
