| More

Radical technologies: Blockchain as an organizational movement

Views: 426 Downloads: 379
Maria Koletsi

Abstract


The emergence of blockchain technology has created a debate regarding technologies’ socio-cultural symbolism. Prevailing as alternative or complementary to internet technology, blockchain’s decentralized radical architecture reflects organizational change, enhancement of degrees of freedom, for individual identities and communities, new schemes of distributed trust and privacy, transformation of power relations and social reality perception. The current paper aims to contribute to the ongoing debate, from an organizational and socio-psychological perspective, discussing the key elements of a socially grounded technology, like any other technological product within the history of humanity. Through an evolutionary lens, blockchain technology is examined as a decentralized grassroots organizational movement at birth, influencing and, at the same time, be influenced, by science, culture, as well as by other aspects of individual and collective networked life, apart from the economy. Social sciences and cyber sciences are in a crossroad where society and technology integrate creating a mixed socio-technological or techno-social reality. Therefore, it is of high importance for them, to address the new epistemological challenges by developing new methodologies and tools, independently from any utopian or dystopian predictions.


Keywords


blockchain; organizational movement; decentralized technologies; social contract; radicalization; cyberpsychology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agora Technologies [Swiss Lab & Foundation for Digital Democracy]. (2018). Bringing voting systems into the digital age: Agora. Retrieved from https://www.agora.vote

Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C. (2017). Blockchain as radical innovation: a framework for engaging with distributed ledgers. Paper presented at the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa

Belu, D. S., & Feenberg, A. (2010). Heidegger’s aporetic ontology of technology. Inquiry, 53 (1), https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740903478376

Berners-Lee,T. (2014). We need a Magna Carta for the internet. New Perspectives Quarterly, 31 (3), 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.11475

Bjerk, O. (2015). How is bitcoin money? Theory, Culture & Society, 33 (1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263276415619015

Blockchain at Berkeley (2019). A student organization focused on blockchain innovation via education, research, design, and consulting. Retrieved from https://blockchain.berkeley.edu

Blockchain Babes (2018). Women of Blockchain: Instead of focusing on how few women there are, let’s focus on the women that there are. Retrieved from https://www.blockchain-babes.com

Blumer, B. (2018, September 26). Blockchain is a movement. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com

Borum, R., (2012). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theo-ries. Journal of Strategic Security, 4 (4), 7-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. United Kingdom: Polity Press.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture, Volume 1: The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

CryptoChicks (n.d.). Blockchain and AI community for women. Retrieved from https://cryptochicks.ca.

Davis, S, Elin., L., & Reeher, G. (2002). Click on democracy: The internet’s power to change political apathy into civic action. USA: Westview Press.

Democracy Earth Foundation. (2015). Power in your hands. A borderless peer to peer de-mocracy. For everyone, anywhere. Retrieved from https://www.democracy.earth.

Dodd, N. (2017). The social life of bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 35 (3), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263276417746464

DuVal Smith, A. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In P. Kol-lock & M. Smith (Eds), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 135-166). London: Routledge.

Fresco (n.d.). Blockchain Art Asset Network. Retrieved from https://fresco.work.

Gaggioli, A. (2018). Blockchain technology: Living in a decentralized everything. Cyberpsy-chology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21 (1), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29097.csi

Gilber, B. A., & Campbell, J. T. (2015). The geographic origins of radical technological para-digms: A configurational study. Research Policy, 44 (2), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.006

Githens-Mazer, J. (2012). The rhetoric and reality: Radicalization and political discourse. International Political Science Review, 0 (0), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192512112454416

Githens-Mazer, J., & Lambert, R. (2010). Why conventional wisdom on radicalization fails: the persistence of a failed discourse. International Affairs, 86 (4), 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00918.x

Heidegger. M. (1977). The Question concerning technology, and other essays. New York: Harper & Row Publishers

Herian, R. (2018). The politics of blockchain. Law & Critique, 29 (2), 129-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-018-9223-1

Klandermans, P. G. (2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35 (1), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12167

Kostakopoulou, D. (2018). Cloud agoras: When blockchain technology meets Arendt’s virtual public spaces. In R. Bauböck (Ed.), Debating transformations of national citizenship (pp. 337-341). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0

Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Software, 35 (4), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2801546

LGBT Foundation (2018, June 5). Blockchain with pride: LGBT Foundation and OST announce partnership to launch global LGBT+ ecosystem. Retrieved from https://lgbt-token.org/.

Lotti, L. (2016). Contemporary art, capitalization and the blockchain: On the autonomy and automation of art’s value. Finance & Society, 2 (2), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v2i2.1724

Lubin, J. [ethereumJoseph]. (2018, December 1). #Blockchain is more than a market. It’s a movement [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/ethereumjoseph/status/1068933986821595137?lang=en.

Magna Carta Libertatum (1215). Retrieved from https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/magna-carta-1215.

Medium (2017, February 22). Bye bye, bank manager: can you trust the blockchain and re-move the middleman? Retrieved from https://toa.life/bye-bye-bank-manager-can-you-trust-the-blockchain-and-remove-the-middleman-6399d896be71.

Oxford Blockchain Network (2016). Learn how blockchain is changing the world. Retrieved from http://oxfordblockchain.net.

Reijers, W., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2018). The blockchain as a narrative technology: Investigat-ing the social ontology and normative configurations of cryptocurrencies. Philosophy & Technology, 31 (1), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0239-x

Reijers, W., O'Brolcháin , F., & Haynes, P. (2016). Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories. Ledger, 1, 134-151. https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2016.62

RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub. (2017). The world’s first research centre on the social sci-ence of Blockchain. Retrieved from https://sites.rmit.edu.au.

Roberts, L. D, Smith, L. M., & Pollock, C. M. (2006). Psychological sense of community in vir-tual communities. In S. Dasgupta (ed.), Encyclopedia of virtual communities and technol-ogies (pp. 390-396). Igi-Global.

Rousseau, J. J. (1895). The social contract or principles of political right. Retrieved from http://www.bl.uk/learning/histcitizen/21cc/utopia/revolution1/rousseau1/rousseau.html.

Schiller, A. L., Breuing, E., & Fritsche, A. (2017, October 26). [Live drawing of Shermin’s talk on ‘Blockchain & the future of the web’ conducted by Riesenspatz] [Infographic]. Re-trieved from https://blockchainhub.net/blog/infographics/future-web-decentralized/.

Swan, M., & De Filippi, P. (2017). Towards a Philosophy of Blockchain. Metaphilosophy, 48. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01676883.

Swan, M. (2015) Blockchain thinking: The brain as a decentralized autonomous corporation. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine, 34 (4), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2015.2494358

The Civil Media Company (2019). Civil: A community-owned journalism network based on transparency and trust. Retrieved from https://civil.co.

United Nations (n.d.). UN Blockchain. Multi-UN agency platform. Retrieved from https://un-blockchain.org.

Velasco, P. R. (2017). Computing ledgers and the political ontology of the blockchain. Metaphilosophy, 48 (5), 712-726.

https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12274

Voshmgir, S. (2017, September). Blockchain & the future of the internet [Video file]. Re-trieved from https://shermin.net/blockchain-future-of-internet-shermin-voshmgir/.

VoteCoin. (2017). Anonymous cryptodemocracy. Retrieved from https://votecoin.site.

Wunder Art Museum (2018). Blockchain-based digital museum. Retrieved from https://wunder.art/#panelBlock1.

Young, S. (2018). Changing governance models by applying blockchain computing. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 23 (2). Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=jlt.

Zeilinger, M. (2018). Digital art as ‘monetised graphics’: Enforcing intellectual property on the blockchain. Philosophy & Technology, 31 (1), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0243-1.

Zwitter, A., & Boisse-Despiaux, M. (2018). Blockchain for humanitarian action and develop-ment aid. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 3 (16), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0044-5.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Maria Koletsi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.