Ad hoc solutions to wicked problems: Pandemics and other challenges in context
Published:
Jul 22, 2021
Keywords:
Systems thinking wicked problem pandemic complexity group work peer learning
Abstract
Wicked problems are considered to be any social, cultural, or other challenges that are difficult to address and hard to devise an effective and sustainable solution for. The utopic wishful thinking humanity relied on for so many decades, that technology and science alone, like a new Deus ex machina, would ultimately save us from any problematic situation we would ever face, and from any possible catastrophe we would ever confront, proved to be unrealistic. In the complex techno-social reality we live in, symptomatic solutions are not enough to address wicked problems. We keep looking for simplistic solutions in an inherent complex world. Something different is needed. Newtonian science and technology can provide working and sustainable solutions, only if they are combined with a systems thinking approach providing a holistic view in context. When we are in an urgent need to take ad hoc measures, for example, to address a direct lethal threat like a new virus, it is critical to take advantage of the time gained through the treatment of the symptoms to devise more sustainable solutions. Otherwise, things can get even worst in the long run.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Brailas, A. (2021). Ad hoc solutions to wicked problems: Pandemics and other challenges in context. Homo Virtualis, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12681/homvir.27582
- Issue
- Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Section
- Commentaries
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Australian Public Service Commission. (2018). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. https://legacy.apsc.gov.au/tackling-wicked-problems-public-policy-perspective
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Wiley.
Brailas, A. (2021). Digital storytelling and the narrative turn in psychology: Creating spaces for collective empowerment. https://doi.org/10.17613/4H64-8470
Brailas, A. (2020). Rhizomatic Learning in Action: A Virtual Exposition for Demonstrating Learning Rhizomes. Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436565
Brailas, A., Koskinas, K., & Alexias, G. (2017). Teaching to emerge: Toward a bottom-up pedagogy. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1377506. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1377506
Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Routledge.
Calvino, I. (1974). Invisible Cities. Harcourt Brace & Company.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, D. P. (2012). Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Harari, Y. N. (2020, March 20). The world after coronavirus. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75
McAdam, E., & Lang, P. (2003). Working in the Worlds of Children: Growing, Schools, Families, Communities Through Imagining. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 2003, 48.
McAdam, E., & Lang, P. (2009). Appreciative Work in Schools: Generating future communities. Kingsham Press.
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. Free Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Santin, C., Chiu, C., & McEwan, F. (2019). Being Systemic as a Way of Life. Reflections on a Trip to China. Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice, 2(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.28963/2.1.9
Shields, P. M. (2003). The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399703256160
von Foerster, H., & von Foerster, H. (2003). Notes on an Epistemology for Living Things. In Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition (pp. 247–259). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21722-3_10
