Evaluation of common in vitro used chemicals' effect on motility and chromatin stability of boar spermatozoa


Published: Nov 10, 2017
Keywords:
boar sperm chromatin heparin DMSO calcium ionophore A23187
I. A. TSAKMAKIDIS (Ι.Α. ΤΣΑΚΜΑΚΙΔΗΣ)
T. KHALIFA
A. G. LYMBEROPOULOS (Α.Γ. ΛΥΜΠΕΡΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ)
I. A. MICHOS (Η.Α. ΜΙΧΟΣ)
C. M. BOSKOS (Κ.Μ. ΜΠΟΣΚΟΣ)
Abstract

Chemicals such as heparin, calcium ionophore and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) have been used in sperm's function evaluation assays, since they are facilitating the sperm capacitation and the induction of acrosome reaction. Many researchers modified porcine in vitro protocols purposing the improvement and validation of in vitro assays. The modification of the above mentioned chemicals' concentration could have a detrimental effect on sperm characteristics, relative to normal sperm function and fertilizing ability. The present study aimed to investigate in vitro effect of various concentrations of, a) heparin (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 μg/ml), b) calcium ionophore A23187 (10, 20, 30 μΜ) and c) DMSO (1, 2, 3 % v/v), that have been used in sperm evaluation techniques, on chromatin instability and total motility of boar spermatozoa. Eight boars were used as semen donors, providing 20 ejaculates. Acridine orange test and subjective evaluation of semen by a microscope equipped with a heated plate were performed in order to evaluate chromatin integrity and motility, respectively. The results of this study showed that the addition of heparin, A23187 and DMSO at concentrations of 8 - 10 μ^πιΐ, 10 μΜ and 1%, respectively, can be used for in vitro handling of boar spermatozoa without reduction of their motility and chromatin quality.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Agarwal A, Said TM (2003) Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Human Reproduction Update 9:331-345.
Ahmadi A, Ng SC (1999) Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Zoology 284:696-704.
Birck A, Labouriau R, Christensen Ρ (2009) Dynamics of the induced acrosome reaction in boar sperm evaluated by flow cytometry. Animal Reproduction Science 115:124-136.
Burkin HR, Miller DJ (2000) Zona pellucida protein binding ability of porcine sperm during epididymal maturation and the acrosomereaction. Developmental Biology 222:99-109.
Carranco A, Reyes R, Magdaleno VM, Huacuja L, Hernandez O, Rosado A, Merchant H, Delgado NM (1983) Heparin-inducednuclei decondensation of mammalian epididymal spermatozoa. Archives of Andrology 10:213-218.
Chamberland A, Fournier V, Tardif S, Sirard MA, Sullivan R, Bailey JL (2001) The effect of heparin on motility parameters and proteinphosphorylation during bovine sperm capacitation. Theriogenology 55:823-835.
Dapino D, Marini Ρ, Cabada M (2006) Effect of heparin on in vitro capacitation of boar sperm. Biological Research 39:631-639.
Delgado NM, Huacuja L, Merchant H, Reyes R, Rosado A (1980) Species specific decondensation of human sperm nuclei by heparin. Archives of Andrology 4:305-313.
Evenson DP, Thompson L, Jost L (1994) Flow cytometric evaluation of boar semen by the sperm chromatin structure assay as related to cryopreservation and fertility. Theriogenology 41:637-651.
Fraser L, Strzezek J (2007) Is there a relationship between the chromatin status and DNA fragmentation of boar spermatozoa following freezing-thawing? Theriogenology 68:248-257.
Gadea J, Selles E, Marco MA (2004) The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 39:303-308.
Gilmore JA, Liu J, Peter AT, Critser JK (1998) Determination of plasma membrane characteristics of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. Biology of Reproduction 58:28-36.
Green CE, Watson PF (2001) Comparison of the capacitation-like state of cooled boar spermatozoa with true capacitation. Reproduction 122:889-898.
Harshan HM, Singh LP, Arangasamy A, Ansari MR, Kumar S (2006) Effect of buffalo seminal plasma heparin binding protein (HBP) on freezability and in vitro fertility of buffalo cauda spermatozoa. Animal Reproduction Science 93:124-133.
Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HD, Reed HC, Curnock RM (1997) Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. Journal of Andrology 18:312-323.
Jager S, Wijchman J, Kremer J (1990) Studies on the decondensation of human, mouse and bull sperm nuclei by heparin and other polyanions. Journal of Experimental Zoology 256:315-322.
Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WM 2000 Storage of boar semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62:143-172.
Lee YJ, Kim S, Ji DB, Kim YJ (2011) Evaluation of Different Cryoprotectants (CPAs) in Boar Semen Cryopreservation. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Science (under publication).
Maravilla-Galvân R, Fierro R, Gonzâlez-Mârquez H, Gómez-Arroyo S, Jimenez I, Betancourt M (2009) Effects of atrazine and fenoxaprop-ethyl on capacitation and the acrosomal reaction in boar sperm. International Journal of Toxicology 28:24-32.
Mikami-Takei K, Fujiwara A, Yasumasu I (1987) The acrosome reaction induced by dimethylsulfoxide in sea urchin sperm. Development Growth and Differentiation 30:125-135.
Nass SJ, Miller DJ, Winer MA, Ax RL (1990) Male accessory sex glands produce heparin-binding proteins that bind to cauda epididymal spermatozoa and are testosterone dependent. Molecular Reproduction and Development 25:237-246.
NRC (1998) Nutrients Requirements of Swine. Subcommittee on Swine Nutrition, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agricultural National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington.
Pant N, Srivastava SP (2003) Testicular and spermatotoxic effects of quinalphos in rats. Journal of Applied Toxicology 23:271-274.
Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish J, Winer MA, First NL (1988) Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biology of Reproduction 38:1171-1180.
Pétrie A, Watson Ρ (2006) Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. 2nd ed, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK: pp 1-240.
Petrunkina AM, Volker G, Brandt H, Töpfer-Petersen E, Waberski D (2005) Functional significance of responsiveness to capacitating conditions in boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 64:1766-1782.
Rasul Z, Ahmed N, Anzar M (2007) Antagonist effect of DMSO on the cryoprotection ability of glycerol during cryopreservation of buffalo sperm. Theriogenology 68:813-819.
Rodriguez PC, Valdez LB, Zaobornyj T, Boveris A, Beconi MT (2011) Nitric oxide and superoxide anion production during heparininduced capacitation in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Reproduction of Domestic Animals 46:74-81.
Songsasen N, Yu I, Murton S, Paccamonti DL, Eilts BE, Godke RA, Leibo SP (2002) Osmotic sensitivity of canine spermatozoa. Cryobiology 44:79-90.
Tardif S, Laforest JP, Cormier N, Bailey JL (1999) The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 52:447-459.
Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S (1984) A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertility and Sterility 42:87-91.
Tsakmakidis IA, Lymberopoulos AG, Vainas E, Boscos CM, Kyriakis SC, Alexopoulos C (2007) Study on the in vitro effect of zearalenone and alpha-zearalenol on boar sperm-zona pellucid interaction by hemizona assay application. Journal of Applied Toxicology 27:498-505.
Varner DD, Bowen JA, Johnson L (1993) Effect of heparin on capacitation/acrosome reaction of equine sperm. Archives of Andrology 31:199-207.
Verma RJ, Nambiar D, Chinoy NJ (2006) Toxicological effects of Carica papaya seed extract on spermatozoa of mice. Journal of Applied Toxicology 26:533-535.
Yanagimachi R (1994) Mammalian fertilization. In: The Physiology of Reproduction. Raven Press, New York: pp 189-317.
Yildiz C, Fleming C, Ottaviani P, McKerlie C (2008) Fresh and frozenthawed sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertility, embryo development and live-born offspring of N-ethyl-Nnitrosourea (ENU) mice. Cryobiology 57:156-162.
Most read articles by the same author(s)