Study of canine ringworm epidemiology in Thessaloniki area


E. BOURDZI - HATZOPOULOU (Ε. ΜΠΟΥΡΤΖΗ - ΧΑΤΖΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ)
Abstract

The presence of dermatophytes in animals with skin lesions (ringworm), as well as in animals with apparently healthy skin (healthy carriers) and in soil specimens was investigated. Skin scales and infected hair from 480 dogs with lesions were examined microscopically by using 20% KOH and by the methylene blue stain. Specimens were also inoculated in Sabouraud-chloramphenicolcycloheximide agar. Hairbrush technique was performed in 500 dogs with apparently healthy skin (330 of the urban and 170 of the rural area). 92 soil specimens were cultured by the hairbaiting method. Dermatophytes were isolated from 220 (40,8%) dogs with skin lesions. M. canis was isolated from the 87,7% of the dogs. M. gypseum from 7,2%, T. mentagrophytes from 4,5% and T. rubrum from 0,4%. Most of the infected animals (148) were up to 24 months old and 140 of them belonged to short coat breeds. From the 330 and the 170 apparently healthy dogs 38 (14,5%) and 35 (20,5%) were found carrying dermatophytes, respectively. M. canis was exclusively isolated from the dogs of the urban area. The most frequent dermatophyte isolated from the dogs of the rural area was M. gypseum, while T. terrestre and T. mentagrophytes were the second and the third isolated. From 30 soil specimens of the urban area and from 62 of the rural area, 25 (83%) and 56 (90,3%) strains of dermatophytes were isolated respectively. M. gypseum was the most frequent isolated of both areas. Representative dermatophytes, 2 strains of T. mentagrophytes and 2 of M. gypseum, isolated from the coat of animals with apparently healthy skin and from the soil proved to be pathogenic for laboratory animals. It is mentioned that M. canis implicated in public health because of its transmission to human and of the numerous cases of the animals owners affected.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ajello L. Present day concepts of the dermatophytes. Mycop. et Mycol. Appi. 1962,17: 315-323.
Kaplan W. Epidemiology and public health significance of ringworm in animals. Arc. Der. 1967, 96: 404-408.
Mantovani A. The role of animals in the epidemiology of the mycoses. Mycopathologia 1978, 65: 61-66.
Knoll R, Reinel D. Dermatophytoses in the region of Hamburg Military Hospital. Zeitschrift fuer Hautkrankheiten, 1989, 64: 675-676.
Rippon JW. Forty four years of dermatophytes in a Chicago clinic (1944-1988). Mycopathologia, 1992,119: 25-28.
Alvaerz D, Luque A, Bracalenti B. Influence of ecological factors on isolation of dermatophytes and geophilickeratiniphilic fungi. Rev. Microbiol. 1986, 28: 351-354.
Caretta G, Manciati F, Ajello A. Dermatophytes and keratinophilic fungi in cats and dogs. Mycoses, 1989, 32:620-626.
Randentz W H. Fungal skin infections associated with animal contact. Amer. Family Physician. 1991, 43: 1253- 1256.
Katoh T. Nishioka K, Sano TA mycological study of pets as a source of human infection due to M. canis. Jap. J. of Med. Mycol. 1993, 34: 325-330.
Marcelou-Kinti U, Kanellis P. Determination of 720 strains of dermatophytes isolated in Greece. Ann. Soc. Beige Med. Trop. 1964, 44: 1005-1012.
Παπαγεωργίου Α. Αι δερματοφυτίαι. Ιατρ. Επιθ. Εν. Δυν. 1973, 7: 494-500.
Devliotou - Panagiotidou D, Koussidou - Eremonti Τ, Karakatsanis G, Minas A, Chryssomalis F, Badillet G. Dermatophytoses due to Trichophyton rubrum in Northern Greece during the decate 1981-1990. Mycoses, 1992, 35: 375-380.
Μπουρτζή - Χατζοπούλου Ε. Ζωοανθρωπονόσοι στην Ελλάδα. Συμβολή στη μελέτη της επιδημιολογίας των δερματοφυτιάσεων. Διδακτορική διατριβή, 1979, Επιστημ. Επετ. Κτην. Σχολής. Παρατ. 7 του 19ου Τόμου.
Μπουρτζή - Χατζοπούλου Ε, Κοντός Β. Περιπτώσεις δερματοφυτιάσεως σε σκύλους και ημιόνους οφειλόμενες στο Μ. gypseum. Ελλ. Κτηνιατρική, 1984, 27: 77-84.
Muller G, Kirk R. Small Animal Dermatology. 1976. The C.V. Mosby. Co St. Louis.
Baxter M. Ringworm due to M. canis in cats and dogs in New Zealand. N.Z. Vet. Med. J. 1973, 21: 33-37.
Μαρσελου - Κιντή Ο. Ιατρική Μυκητολογία, pp 298-340, 1686, Αθήνα.
Vanbreuseghem R. Technique biologique pour Γ isolement des dermatophytes de sol. Ann. Soc. Belge Med. Trop. 1952, 32: 173-178.
Vanbreuseghem R, De Vroey C, Takashio M. Guide pratique de Mycologie Medicale et Vétérinaire. 2eme éd. Masson, Paris 1978, 239-240.
Mackenzie D, Loeffler W, Mantovani A, Fujikura T. Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and control of dermatophytosis in man and animals. World Health
Organization, 1992, 5-28.
Bianchi M, Robles A, Arechavala A. Survey of species causing dermatophytoses at the Hospita "Francisco Javier Muniz" Revista Argentina de Miclogia. 1992,11: 24-26.
Faggi E, Saponetto Ν, Sagone M. Dermatophytes isole's des carnivores domestiques a Florence (Italie). 1989, 16: 297-301.
Pereiro Miguens M, Pereiro M, Pereiro M Jr. Review of dermatophytoses in Galina from 1951 to 1987 and comparison with other areas of Spain. Mycopathologia, 1991,113: 65-78.
Δεβλιώτου - Παναγιωτίδου Δ. Νοσοκομείο Αφροδισίων και Δερματικών Νόσων, Θεσσαλονίκη. 1995, Προσωπική επικοινωνία.
Μαράκη Σ, Τσελεντης Ι. Δερματοφυτώσεις στην Κρήτη κατά τη χρονική περίοδο 1992-1995. 17ο Εθνικό Συνέδριο Μικροβιολογίας Ιατρικής Βιοπαθολογίας, 26-28 Απριλίου, 1996, Θεσσαλονίκη.
Otcenacek M. Ecologie of the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia, 1988, 75: 67-72.
Yamada C, Hasagava A, Ono K, Pal M, Khamura C. Trichphyton rubrum infection in a dog. Jap. J. Med. Myc. 1991, 32: 67-71.