Consumer Protection and Food Safety in Greece: Sanctions imposed by Hellenic Food Authority, in the years 2005-2013

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.18065
Keywords:
food safety hygiene violations sanctions
G. GRINTZALI
Harokopio University, School of Health Science & Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics
E. PEXARA
Hellenic Food Authority, Regional Division of Attica
V. CARAYANNI
Department of Public & Community Health, University of West Attica
G. BOSKOU
Harokopio University, School of Health Science & Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics
Abstract

The enforcement of food safety legislation consists of a number of procedures, that may lead in certaincases in imposing administrative penalties and fines, in an effort to alter the nonconformity status of certain food establishments, according to the predefined legislative standards. The aim of this study is to evaluate data upon nonconformity of food establishments in Greece, in order to define trends and frequencies in the general framework of food safety and consumer protection. Hellenic Food Authority (EFET), the competent authority for food safety in Greece, during the period 2005-2013, imposed fines to food establishments that mount to 17,513,900€ for food safety violations. Most of the fines were imposed at mass catering establishments (21.6%) followed by supermarkets (16.2%), food industry (15.1%) and food manufacture establishments (10.7%). Moreover Attica Prefecture is the region with the highest, in number, imposed fines (32.4%), followed in descending order by the Prefecture of Central Makedonia (31.5%) and of Crete (9.6%). Significant difference, in imposing fines (χ2 test, p≤0.05), was observed between mass catering establishments and violations concerning: i. Good Hygiene Practice (GHP) ii. infrastructure, iii. consumer misleading, iv. sale of unsuitable foods, v. preservation temperatures, vi. lack of food handlers training in food safety, vii. lack of food handlers booklet and viii. traceability systems. Moreover significant differences were observed between the level of the imposed fine and the type of violations (t-test, p≤0.05) concerning: i. only or and GHP, ii. only or and the sale of unsafe foods and iii. only or and issues of consumer misleading. According to Pearson coefficient there is a weak negative although significant (p≤0.001) correlation between years and the level of the imposed fines (r=- 0.079). In addition violations related to HACCP system, that resulted in imposing fines to food establishments by EFET in 2012, corresponded to 31.8% of the total delinquency concerning HACCP system ascertained by the Prefectural Directorates, that are in charge of official control in the field of food hygiene.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Berg, L, (2004) Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: a comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite 42 (1), 21–32.
De Jonge, J, van Trijp, JCM, Renes, RJ, Frewer, LJ, (2007) Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food; it is two dimensional structure and determinants. Risk Anal 27 (3), 729–740.
Eiser, JR, Miles, S, Frewer, LJ, (2002) Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol 32 (11), 2423–2433.
Frewer, LJ, Howard, C, Hedderley, D, & Shepherd, R (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. RiskAnal 16, 473–486.
Henson, SJ and Caswell, JA (1999) Food Safety Regulation: An Overview of Contemporary Issues. Food Policy24: 589-603
Henson, SJ and Jaffee, S (2008) Understanding Developing Country Strategic Responses to the Enhancement of Food Safety Standards The World Economy, 31(1): 1-15.
Houghton, JR, Rowe, G, Frewer, LJ, van Kleef, E, Chryssochoidis, G, Kehagia, O, Korzen-Bohr, S, Lassen, J, Pfenning, U, Strada, A, (2008) The quality of food risk management in Europe: perspectives and priorities. Food Policy 33 (1), 13–26.
Joint Ministerial Decision 15523/2006 “Additional measures to implement Regulations (EC) no 178/2002, 852/2004, 853/2004, 854/2004 and 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and harmonization of Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and Council (OJ 1187/B’/31.08.2006).
Joint Ministerial Decision 10755/2006 “Authorization to the Management Board of EFET to impose fines and procedure for imposing fines of par. 8, artic. 5 of Law 2741/99, as amended by par. 19, artic. 37 of Law 3066/2002, par. 5, artic. 11 of Law 3438/2006 and in accordance with par. 6, artic. 11 of Law 3428/2006” (OJ 727/15.06.2006).
Law 2741/1999 “Hellenic Food Authority and other provisions of the Ministry of Development” (OJ199/A’/28.09.1999).
Law 4235/20145 “Administrative measures, procedures and sanctions in the implementation of European and National legislation in the field of food, feed, animal health and welfare and other provisions of the Ministry of Rural Development and Food” (OJ 32/A’/11.02.2014).
Lupien JR, (2007) “Prevention and control of food safety risks: the role of governments, food producers, marketers, and academia”, Acia Pav J .Clin Nutr, 16 Suppl 1:74-9.
Martinez, MG, Fiarne, A, Caswell, JA, Henson, S (2007) “Co-regulations as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public-private partnerships”. Food Policy 323 (3): 299-314, doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.07.005
Regulation (EC) 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (EE L 139/30.04..2004).
Regulation (EC) 2015/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, amending Regulations (EC) No 999/2001, (EC) No 396/2005, (EC) No 1069/2009, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 1151/2012, (EU) No 652/2014, (EU) 2016/429 and (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 1/2005 and (EC) No 1099/2009 and Council Directives 98/58/EC, 1999/74/EC, 2007/43/EC, 2008/119/EC and 2008/120/EC, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 89/608/EEC, 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 96/23/EC, 96/93/EC and 97/78/EC and Council Decision 92/438/EEC (Official Controls Regulation)
World Bank, 2005 Food Safety and Agricultural Health Standards: Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Country Exports. Washington DC, World Bank.