Later exposure to different perch material and design affects behaviour and performance of Leghorn hens


Published: Apr 19, 2024
Keywords:
Perch material Perch design Productive performance Egg quality
J. Anwar
A. Mahmud
H.M. Ishaq
S Ahmad
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-3083
E.U. Khan
M. Waqas
M. Usman
M. Zaid
Abstract

Perching behaviour is natural and evident in Red Jungle fowl, from which modern-day chickens originated. A positive impact of perching in the improvement of a bird’s physical condition. In this experimental study, 540 LSL lite laying hens were randomly distributed according to Complete Randomized Design in 6 treatments with 6 replicates of 15 birds each. The experiment was set up as a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments; treatments consisted of 2 perch materials (wooden and plastic) and 3 perch shapes (square, round, and triangle). Effects of perch material and shape were evaluated on productive performance, behaviour and welfare traits, and egg characteristics. Egg weight was higher in wooden perch materials than plastic. Regarding perch design, egg weight, production percentage, and feed conversion ratio per kg of egg mass of commercial layers differed significantly. Moreover, wing flapping and perching behaviour were significant among different perch designs. Egg volume, egg weight, albumen height, Haugh unit score, and shell thickness differed significantly among perch designs. In conclusion, the provision of different perch designs especially wooden and triangular perches positively influences productivity, behaviour, and egg quality traits in laying birds. 

Article Details
  • Section
  • Research Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
S Ahmad, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Assistant Professor, Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

References
Appleby MC, Smith S, Hughes, B (1992) Individual perching behaviour
of laying hens and its effects in cages. Brit Poult Sci 33:227-238.
Appleby MC (1995) Perch length in cages for medium hybrid laying
hens. Brit Poult Sci 36:23-31.
Asghar SA, Zamani P, Rahmati M, Mahmoudi H (2012) The effect of cage
density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals.
J Appl Poult Res 21:467-475.
Barnett J, Tauson R, Downing J, Janardhana V, Lowenthal J, Butler K,
Cronin G (2009) The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either
alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of
laying hens. Poult Sci 88:456-470.
Botreau R, VeissierI,Perny P (2009) Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality®. Anim Welf 18:363-370.
Campbell D, Makagon M, Swanson J,Siegford J (2016) Litter use by laying hens in a commercial aviary: dust bathing and piling. Poult Sci
:164-175.
Cordiner L, Savory C (2001) Use of perches and nest boxes by laying
hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency
of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. Appl Anim Behav Sci
(4):305-317.
Dereli Fidan E, Nazlıgül A (2013) Cage position and density effect on
some welfare criteria in Denizli chicken. Ind J Anim Sci 83 (6):645-
Donaldson CJ, O’Connell NE (2012) The Influence of Access to Aerial
Perches on Fearfulness, Social Behaviour and Production Parameters
in Free-Range Laying Hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 142:51-60.
Duncan DB (1955) Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics 11:1-
EFSA (2015) AHWA Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal
Welfare). Scientific Opinion on welfare aspects of the use of perches
for laying hens. EFSAJ 13:4131-4138.
Glatz P, Barnett J (1996) Effect of perches and solid sides on production,
plumage and foot condition of laying hens housed in conventional
cages in a naturally ventilated shed. Aust J Exp Agric 36:269-275.
Economic Survey. 2022. Pakistan Economic Survey 2021-22, Chap 2, Agriculture, IV. Livestock and Poultry, b) Poultry. pp. 37.
Hester P, Enneking S, Haley B, Cheng HW, Einstein M, Rubin D (2013)
The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying
on musculoskeletal health of caged White Leghorn hens. Poult Sci
:1972-1980.
Janczak AM, Riber AB (2015) Review of rearing-related factors affecting
the welfare of laying hens. Poult Sci 94:1454-1469.
Lamb N, Scott GB (1998) Perching behaviour and preferences for different perch designs among laying hens. Anim Welf 7:203-216.
Liu K, Xin H, Shepherd T, Zhao Y (2018) Perch-shape preference and
perching behaviors of young laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci
:34-41.
Nakaue H, Goeger M, Arscott G (1984) Effect of feed trough heights and
perches on the performance of dwarf single comb White Leghorn layers housed in cages. Poult Sci 63:447-449.
Olsson I, Keeling L (2002) The push-door for measuring motivation in
hens: laying hens are motivated to perch at night. Anim Welf 11:11-
Özbey O, Esen F (2007) The Effects of Different Breeding Systems on
Egg Productivity and Egg Quality Characteristics of Rock Partridges.
Poult Sci 86:782-785.
PPA (2016) Present Status of Poultry Sector. Pakistan Poultry Association,
Pakistan.
Pickel T, Scholz B, Schrader L (2010): Perch material an diameter affects
particular behaviours in laying hens. Anim Behav Sci 127:37-42.
Rehman MS, Mahmud A, Mehmood S, PashaTN, KhanMT, HussainJ
(2018) Assessing behavior in Aseel pullets under free-range, parttime free-range, and cage system during growing phase. Poult Sci
: 725-732.
Shi SR, Lu J, Tong HB, Zou JM, Wang KH (2012) Effects of graded replacement of soybean meal by sunflower seed meal in laying hen diets on hen performance, egg quality, egg fatty acid composition, and
cholesterol content. J Appl Poult Res 21:367-374.
StruelensE,Tuyttens F (2009) Effects of perch design on behaviour and
health of laying hens. Anim Welf 18:533-538.
Struelens E, Tuyttens FAM, Duchateau L,Leroy T, Cox M, Vranken E,
Buyse J, Zoons J, Berckmans D, ÖdbergF,Sonck B (2008) Perching
behaviour and perch height preference of laying hens in furnished
cages varying in height. Brit Poult Sci 49:381-389.
Tactacan GB, Guenter W, Lewis N, Rodriguez-Lecompte J, House J
(2009) Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and
enriched cages. Poult Sci 88:698-707.
Tauson R (2005) Management and housing systems for layers-effects on
welfare and production. World’s Poult Sci J 61:477-490.
Wu G, Bryant MM, Gunawardana P, Roland SDA (2007) Effect of Nutrient Density on Performance, Egg Components, Egg Solids, Egg
Quality, and Profits in Eight C
Most read articles by the same author(s)