Digestibility and Silage Quality of Potato Pulp Silages Prepared with Different Feedstuff


ΗΗ ŞENYÜZ
ΜΑ KARSLI
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine silage quality and digestibility of potato pulp ensiled with different feedstuffs (straw, alfalfa hay and wheat bran). A total of 5 different potato pulp silages (PPS) were prepared with 5% ground barley straw, ground alfalfa hay, wheat bran alone or combination of 2.5 % wheat bran+ground straw, and wheat bran+ground alfalfa hay on a fed basis.These silages were ensiled in 2-L jars. After 49d of ensiling, all silages were opened and the chemical composition, pH, organic acids, ammonia-N contents, in situ organic matter (OM) and starch degradabilities and in vitro OM digestibility (IVOMD) of the silages were determined. Then, energy values were calculated.The highest dry matter (DM) and OM concentrations were observed in PPS prepared with wheat bran alone (P<0.05). Potato pulp silage containing ground barley straw alone had the lowest crude protein (CP) concentration (P<0.05) and silage containing wheat bran alone had the lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentrations among PPS (P<0.05). Potato pulp with wheat bran alone had the highest lactic acid concentrations among all silages (P<0.05). Acetic acid concentrations of silages were similar (P>0.05). The in situ OM degradability and IVOMD were significantly different (P<0.05) among all silages. However, in situ starch digestibility was similar among PPS (P>0.05). It can be concluded that PPS prepared with different feedstuffs at a 5% level had good fermentation properties and high degradability values. Even a high quality PPS can be obtained with the addition of 5% ground barley straw alone.

Article Details
  • Rubrik
  • Research Articles
Downloads
Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.
Literaturhinweise
Aibibula Y, Okine A, Hanada M, Murata S, Okamoto M, Goto M (2007) Effect of replacing rolled corn with potato pulp silage in grass silage-based diets on nitrogen utilization by steers. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 20(8): 1215-1221.
AOAC (1990) Association of Official Analitical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Washington, DC.
Baytok E, Aksu T, Karsli MA, Muruz H (2005) The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29(2): 469-474.
Bingöl NT, Karslı MA, Bolat D, Akça İ (2008) The effects of molasses and formic acid addition in sainfoin silage harvested at different maturities on silage quality and digestibility. Van Vet J 19(2): 61-66.
Boğa M, Çevik KK 2012. Ruminant hayvanlar için karma yem hazirlama programı. XIV. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri.Uşak, Turkey: pp 249-256 (in Turkish).
Cheng L, Hu X, Gu Z, Hong Y, Li Z, Li C (2019) Characterization of physicochemical properties of cellulose from potato pulp and their effects on enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulase. Int JBiol Mac 131: 564-571.
Çetinkaya N (1992) Yem Maddelerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Naylon TorbaMetodunun Kullanılması. Yem Magazin Dergisi 1(4): 28-30 (in Turkish).
Dhingra D, Michael M, Rajput H, Chopra S (2013). Utilization of potato processing waste for compound cattle feed. agricultural engineering today. 37(4): 40-45.
Ergün A, Tuncer Ş, Çolpan İ, Yalçin S, Yildiz G, Küçükersan MK, Küçükersan S, Şehu A (2002) Yemler,yem hijyeni ve teknolojisi. Ankara, Medipress. p:80
Filya İ (2003) The effect of lactobacillus buchneri and lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages. J Dairy Sci 86(11):3575-3581.
Goering HK, Van soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses (Apparatus, reagents, prcedures, and some applications). US Govt Print Off, U.S, Washington.
Jones DIH, Jones R, Moseley G (1990) Effect of in corporating rolled barley in autumn-country e grass silage on effluent production, silage fermentation and cattle performance. J AgriSci115(03): 399-408.
Kurnik K, Treder K, Skorupa-Kłaput M, Tretyn A, Tyburski J (2015) Removal of phenol from synthetic and ındustrial wastewater by potato pulp peroxidases. Water AirSoil Poll 226(8): 254.
Kutlu HR (2008) Yem değerlendirme ve analiz yöntemleri. Lecture Notes Çukurova University, Balcalı-Adana (in Turkish).
Marten GC, Barnes RF (1979) Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with in vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems. workshop on standardization of analytical methodology for feeds. 12-14 Mar, CA.
Mohamadian S, Alipour D, Mahmoudi-Abyane M (2016) Effect of different moisture absorbents on silage fermentation quality of wet potato pulp. Iranian J Anim Sci Res 8(2): 248-257.
Ncobela CN, Kanengoni AT, Hlatini VA, Thomas RS, Chimonyo M (2017) A review of the utility of potato by-products as a feed resource for smallholder pig production. Anim Feed Sci and Tech 227: 107-117.
Nelson ML (2010) Utilization and application of wet potato processing coproducts for finishing cattle. J Anim Sci88(13): 133-142.
NRC (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: National Acad. Press.
Okine A, Hanada M, Aibibula Y, Okamato M (2005) Ensiling of potato pulp with or without bacterial inoculants and its effect on fermentationquality, nutrient composition and nutritive value. AnimFeedSci-Tech121(3-4):329-343.
Omer HA, Abdel-Magid SS, Salman FM, Salman A, Ahmed SM, Mohamed M, Awadalla IM, Zaki MS (2011) Using potato processing waste in sheep rations egypt. Life Sci J 8(4): 733-742.
Orskov ER, Shand WJ Shand (1997) Use of the nylon bag technique for protein and energy evaluation and for rumen environment studies in ruminants. livest. Res. Rural Dev 9: 1-10. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/ lrrd9/1/orskov.htm.
Pen B, Oyabu T, Hıdaka S, Hıdarı H (2005) Effect of potato by-products based silage on growth performance, carcass characteristics and fatty acid composition of carcass fats in holstein steers. Asian-Aust JAnim Sci18(4): 490-496.
Rotz CA, Muck RE (1994) Changes in forage quality during harvest and storage.Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization (Foragequalityev) 828-868.
SAS S (1995) User’s guide version 9.1: SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA.
Steel RG, Torrie JH (1980) Principle and procedures of statistic: A biometrical approach: New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sugimoto M, Saito W, Ooi M, Sato Y, Saito T, Mori K (2006)The effects of potato pulp and feding level of supplements on digestibility, ın situ forage degradation and ruminal fermentation in beef steers.Anim Sci J 77(6): 587-594.
Sugimoto M, Chiba T, Kanamoto M, Hidari H, Kida K, Saito W, Ooi M, Sato Y, Saito T (2007) Effects of urea treatment of potato pulp (pp) and inclusion levels of potato pulp silage in supplements on digestibility and ruminal fermentation in beef steers. Anim Sci J 78(6): 587-
Sugimoto M, Kanamoto M, Chiba T, Hidari H, Kida K, Saito W, Ooi M, Sato Y, Saito T (2008) The effects of protein sources supplemented with urea‐treated potato pulp (pp) and feeding levels of the pp silagebased concentrate on feed ıntake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation in beef steers. Anim Sci J 79(4): 443-452.
Sugimoto M, Saıto W, Ooi M, Sato Y, Saito T (2009)The effects of ınclusion levels of urea-treated potato pulp silage in concentratean droughage sources on finishing performance and carcass quality in cull beef cows.Anim Sci J 80(3): 280-285.
Sugimoto M, Saito W, Ooi M (2010) The effects of urea‐treated potato pulp (pp) ensiled with beet pulp or wheat bran pellets to reduce moisture of pp and flake density of corn grain supplemented with the pp silage on digestibility and ruminal fermentation in beef steers. Anim Sci J 81(3): 316-324.
Tilley JM, Terry R (1963) A two‐stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci 18(2): 104-111.
Tjardes K, Buskirk D, Allen M, Ames N, Bourquin L, Rust S (2000) Brown midrib 3 corn silage improves digestion but not performance of growing beef steers.J Anim Sci 78(11): 2957 - 2965.
Tuncer Ş, Kocabatmaz M, Coşkun B, Şeker E (1989). Kimyasal maddelerle muamele edilen arpa samanının sindirilme derecesinin naylon kese (nylon bag) tekniği ile tespit edilmesi. Doğa TU Vet ve Hay D 13: 66-81 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
Valadares NR, Andrade Junior VCD, Pereira RC, Fialho C, Teixeira M, Ferreira MAM (2019) Effect of different additives on the silage quality of sweet potato branches. Revista Caatinga, 32(2): 506-513.
Van Soest P, Robertson J (1979) Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds standardization of analytical methodology for feeds. Ottawa, ON, CA.IDRC.
Wang TY, Wu YH, Jiang CY, Liu Y (2010)Solid state fermented potato pulp can be used as poultry feed. British Poultry Sci51(2): 229-234.
Yang JS, Mu TH, Ma MM (2018) Extraction, structure, and emulsifying properties of pectin from potato pulp. Food Chem, 244: 197-205.
Yang JS, Mu TH, Ma MM (2019) Optimization of ultrasound-microwave assisted acid extraction of pectin from potato pulp by response surface methodology and its characterization. Food Chem 289: 351-359.
Zhang WW, Zhang YG, Liu Z (2012) effect of different absorbents on fermentation quality of wet potato pulp. J Anim Vet Adv 11(22): 4230-4235.
Zunong M, Tuerhong T, Okamoto M, Hongo A, Hanada M (2009)Effects of a potato pulp silage supplement on the composition of milk fatty acids when fed to grazing dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Tech 152(1-2):81-91.