Important aspects on beef-cross-dairy breeding related to reproduction and the traits of calves beef x dairy crossbreeding
Resumen
Crossbreeding between beef sires and dairy dams is not a new concept; it is one of the first practices used on dairy herds. However, the need to raise the milk yield from dairy cows leads to strict selection of dairy genetics and, therefore to a drop in fertility of the cows and to the profit from selling calves. Generally, in dairy farms calves produced, that are not used for replacement animals, are usually sold to fattening units. Due to growth restriction and poor carcass quality of these purebred dairy calves, it is important to reintroduce the beef x dairy crossbreeding to dairy farms for producing more valuable calves. To accomplish the most economic gain from the breeding strategy for crossbreeding, reproductive indices such as conception rate, gestation length, calving difficulty and calf mortality of the beef x dairy crossbreeding animals should be taken into consideration, as well as beef sire’s genetics transmitted ability. Moreover, important factors for beef-cross-dairy calf production are the feed intake and the quality of the carcass as well as some visual characteristics containing weight at birth, coat color, polledness and docility. Lastly, understanding the dairy farmers’ attitude to sire selection and the consumers’ meat preferences could provide valuable information about improving the efficiency of this breeding strategy. In conclusion, beef x dairy crossbreeding could increase meat production especially in countries in need, although more research is needed about synchronization protocols for Artificial Insemination with beef or sexed beef semen to dairy cows.
Article Details
- Cómo citar
-
Tsiligianni, S., Ligda, C., Souglis, E., Kazlari, Z., Krystallidou, E., & Tsiligianni, T. (2025). Important aspects on beef-cross-dairy breeding related to reproduction and the traits of calves: beef x dairy crossbreeding. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 75(4), 8143–8154. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.37101
- Número
- Vol. 75 Núm. 4 (2024)
- Sección
- Review Articles
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Ahmed RH, Schmidtmann C, Mugambe J, Thaller G (2023) Effects of the
Breeding Strategy Beef-on-Dairy at Animal, Farm and Sector Levels.
Animals 13:2182.
Arens SC, Sharpe KT, Schutz MM, Heins BJ (2023) Response to ad libitum
milk allowance by crossbred dairy and dairy-beef calves in an
automated feeding system. Transl Anim Sci 7:txad063l. DOI: https://
doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad063 .
Ask-Gullstrand P, Strandberg E, Båge R, Berglund B (2023) Genetic parameters
of pregnancy loss in dairy cows estimated from pregnancy-
associated glycoproteins in milk. J Dairy Sci 106:6316-6324.
Basiel BL, Felix TL (2022) Board Invited Review: Crossbreeding beef ×
dairy cattle for the modern beef production system. Transl Anim Sci
:1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac025 .
Berry DP (2021) Invited review: Beef-on-dairy—The generation of crossbred
beef × dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 104:3789-3819.
Berry DP, Amer PR, Evans RD, Byrne T, Cromie AR, Hely F (2019) A
breeding index to rank beef bulls for use on dairy females to maximize
profit. J Dairy Sci 102:10056-10072.
Berry DP, Ring S (2024) Comparison of calving and revenue-generating
qualities in beef-sired male and female progeny from dairy cows. JDS
Commun 5:33-37.
Berry DP, Ring SC (2020) Observed progeny performance validates the
benefit of mating genetically elite beef sires to dairy females. J Dairy
Sci 103:2523-2533.
Berry DP, Ring S (2021) Dairy Producers Who Market Their Surplus
Progeny as Calves Use Germplasm With Slightly Lighter and
Less-Conformed Carcasses Than Producers Who Rear Their Surplus
Progeny Beyond Weaning.
Front Vet Sci 8:731894, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.731894 .
Bittante G, Negrini R, Bergamaschi M, Ni Q, Patel N, Toledo-Alvarado
H, Cecchinato A (2021) Purebreeding with sexed semen and crossbreeding
with semen from double-muscled sires to improve beef production
from dairy herds: Live and slaughter performances of crossbred
calves. J Dairy Sci 104:3210-3220.
Bourdon RM (2014). Understanding Animal’s Breeding. Pearson Education
Limited.
Bown MD, Muir PD, Thomson BC (2016) Dairy and beef breed effects
on beef yield, beef quality and profitability: a review. N Z J Agric Res
:174-184.
Bragg R, Macrae A, Lycett S, Burrough E, Russell G, Corbishley A (2021)
Risk factor analysis for beef calves requiring assisted vaginal delivery
in Great Britain. Vet Rec 188:47-80.
Cabrera VE (2022) Economics of using beef semen on dairy herds. JDS
Commun 3:147-151.
Carlén E, Pedersen J, Pösö J, Eriksson J, Nielsen US, Aamand GP (2016)
Youngstock survival in Nordic cattle genetic evaluation. In: Proceedings
of the Interbull Meeting Puerto Varas, Chile: pp. 80-84.
Chebel RC, Cunha TC (2020) Optimization of timing of insemination of dairy heifers inseminated with sex-sorted semen. J Dairy Sci
:5591-5603.
Clasen JB, Bengtsson C, Källström HN, Strandberg E, Fikse WF, Rydhmer
L (2021) Dairy cattle farmers’ preferences for different breeding
tools. Animal 15:100409.
Clasen JB, Fikse WF, Kargo M, Rydhmer L, Strandberg E, Østergaard
S, (2020) Economic consequences of dairy crossbreeding in conventional
and organic herds in Sweden. J Dairy Sci 103:514-528.
Clasen JB, Norberg E, Madsen P, Pedersen J, Kargo M (2017) Estimation
of genetic parameters and heterosis for longevity in crossbred Danish.
J Dairy Sci 100: 6337-6342.
Coleman L, Back P, Blair H, López-Villalobos N, Hickson R (2021) Sire
Effects on Birth Weight, Gestation Length, and Pre-Weaning Growth
of Beef-Cross-Dairy Calves: A Case Study in New Zealand. Dairy
:385-395.
Cottle DJ, Wallace M, Lonergan P, Fahey AG (2018) Bio-economics of
sexed semen utilization in a high-producing Holstein x Friesian dairy
herd. J Dairy Sci 101:4498-4512.
Creutzinger K, Pempek J, Habing G, Proudfoot K, Locke S, Wilson D,
Renaud D (2021) Perspectives on the management of surplus dairy
calves in the United States and Canada. Front Vet Sci 8:661453.
Dawod A, Elbaz HT (2020) Effect of sexed semen, puberty and breeding
ages on fertility of Holstein dairy heifers treated with double Ovsynch
protocol. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52:2925-2930.
Davis RB, Norberg E, Fogh A (2020) Estimation of genetic parameters
for young stock survival in beef × dairy crossbred calves. Animal
:445-451.
Dematawewa CMB, Berger PJ (1997) Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility
and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for
Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 80:754-761.
Dorshorst BC, Henegar X, Liao M, Sällman Almén CJ, Rubin S, Ito K,
Wakamatsu P, Stothard B, Van Doormaal G, Plastow (2015) Dominant
red coat color in Holstein cattle is associated with a missense
mutation in the coatomer protein complex. Subunit Alpha (COPA)
Gene. PLoS One 10:e0128969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128969.
Eaglen SAE, Coffey MP, Woolliams JA, Mrode R, Wall E (2011) Phenotypic
effects of calving ease on the subsequent fertility and milk
production of dam and calf in UK Holstein-Friesian heifers. J Dairy
Sci 94:5413-5423.
Eriksson S, Ask-Gullstrand P, Fikse WF, Jonsson E, Eriksson JA, Stålhammar
H, Wallenbeck A, Hessle A (2020) Different beef breed sires
used for crossbreeding with Swedish dairy cows - effects on calving
performance and carcass traits. Livest Sci 232:103902.
Felix TL, Emenheiser JC, Govoni KE, Zinn SA, Reed SA (2023) Survey
of the use of beef semen in dairy herds in Pennsylvania and nearby
states. Transl Anim Sci 7:txad038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/
txad038
Fitzgerald AM, Ryan DP, Berry DP (2015) Factors associated with differential
in actual gestational age and gestational age predicted from
transrectal ultrasonography in pregnant dairy cows. Theriogenology
:358-364.
Foraker BA, Ballou MA, Woerner DR (2022b) Crossbreeding beef sires to
dairy cows: cow, feedlot, and carcass performance. Transl Anim Sci
:txac059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac059 .
Foraker BA, Frink JL, Woerner DR (2022a) Invited review: a carcass and
meat perspective of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. Transl Anim Scie
:txac027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac027 .
Fouz R, Gandoy F, Sanjuá NL, Yus E Diéguez FJ (2013) The use of crossbreeding
with beef bulls in dairy herds:effects on calving difficulty
and gestation length. Animal, 7:211-215.
Haagen, IW, Hardie LC, Heins BJ, Dechow CD (2021) Genetic parameters
of calf morbidity and stayability for US organic Holstein calves.
J Dairy Sci 104:11770-11778.
Halfman B, Sterry R (2019) Dairy farm use, and criteria for use, of
beef genetics on dairy females. https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/wbic/
files/2019/07/dairy-beef-survey-white-paper-Final-4-4-2019.pdf.
Hansen M, Madsen P, Jensen J, Pedersen J, Christensen LG (2003) Genetic
parameters of postnatal mortality in Danish Holstein calves. Journal
of Dairy Sci 86:1807-1817.
Hazel AR, Heins BJ, Hansen LB (2017) Fertility, survival, and conformation
of Montbéliarde × Holstein and Viking Red × Holstein crossbred
cows compared with pure Holstein cows during first lactation in 8
commercial dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 100:9447-9458.
Huuskonen AK, Pesonen M, Kämäräinen H, Kauppinen R (2013a) A
comparison of the growth and carcass traits between dairy and dairy
× beef breed crossbred heifers reared for beef production. J Anim
Feed Sci 22:188-196.
Huuskonen AK, Pesonen M, Kämäräinen H, Kauppinen R (2013b) A
comparison of purebred Holstein-Friesian and Holstein-Friesian ×
beef breed bulls for beef production and carcass traits. Agric Food
Sci 22:262-271.
Lauber MR, Cabrera EM, Santos VG, Carvalho PD, Maia C, Carneiro B,
Valenza A, Cabrera VE, Parrish JJ, Fricke PM (2021) Comparison of
reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers
for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen based on
expression of estrus, pregnancy outcomes, and cost per pregnancy. J
Dairy Sci 104:12953-12967.
Macmillan K, Gobikrushanth M, Mapletoft RJ, Colazo MG (2021) The
effect of altering the timing of GnRH administration and artificial
insemination in a modified 5-d CO-Synch protocol using sex-sorted
semen in dairy heifers. Theriogenology 159:53-59.
Mallory DA, Lock SL, Woods DC, Poock SE, Patterson DJ (2013) Hot
topic: Comparison of sex-sorted and conventional semen within a
fixed-time artificial insemination protocol designed for dairy heifers.
J Dairy Sci 96:854-856.
Martín N, Coleman L, López-Villalobos N, Schreurs N, Morris S, Blair
H, McDade J, Back P, Hickson R (2021) Estimated Breeding Values
of Beef Sires Can Predict Performance of Beef-Cross-Dairy Progeny.
Frontiers in Genetics 12:712715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/
fgene.2021.712715 .
Martín N, Schreurs N, Morris S, López-Villalobos S, McDade J, Hickson
R (2020) Sire Effects on Post-Weaning Growth of Beef-Cross-Dairy
Cattle: A Case Study in New Zealand. Animals 10:2313-2324.
Masello M, Perez MM, Granados GE, Stangaferro ML, Ceglowski B,
Thomas MJ, Giordano JO (2019) Reproductive performance of replacement
dairy heifers submitted to first service with programs that
favor insemination at detected estrus, timed artificial insemination, or
a combination of both. J Dairy Sci 102:1671-1681.
de Maturana EL, Ugarte E, González-Recio O (2007) Impact of calving
ease on functional longevity and herd amortization costs in Basque
Holsteins using survival analysis. J Dairy Sci 90:4451-4457.
McGuirk BJ, Going I, Gilmour AR (1998) The genetic evaluation of beef
sires used for crossing with dairy cows in the UK 1. sire breed and
non-genetic effects on calving survey traits. Anim Sci 66:35-45.
McGuirk BJ, Forsyth R, Dobson H (2007) Economic cost of difficult calving
in the United Kingdom dairy herd. Vet Rec 161:685-687.
McHugh N, Fahey AG, Evans RD, Berry DP (2010) Factors associated
with selling price of cattle at livestock marts. Animal 4:1378-1389.
McWhorter TM, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, Cole JB, Fok GC, Lourenco
DAL, VanRaden PM (2020) Investigating conception rate for beef
services sires bred to dairy cows and heifers. J Dairy Sci 103:10374-
Mee JF, Berry DP, Cromie AR (2011) Risk factors for calving assistance
and dystocia in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows in
Ireland. Vet J 187:189-194.
Mellado M, Treviño LM, Chavez MI, Véliz FG, Macías-Cruz U, Avendaño-
Reyes L, García JE (2023) Fertility of Holstein cows and heifers
submitted to timed artificial insemination and receiving one or two
doses (12 h apart) of semen. Reprod Dom Anim 58:39-47.
Mellieon Jr. HI, Pulleya SL, Lambb GC, Larson JE, Stevenson JS (2012)
Evaluation of the 5-day versus a modified 7-day CIDR breeding program
in dairy heifers. Theriogenology 78:1997-2006.
Mota RR, Brito LF, Berry DP (2022) Editorial: Beef on Dairy: The Use
of a Simple Tool to Improve Both Cattle Production Systems. Front
Genet 13:813949.
Olson BM, Bennett DR, McKenzie RH, Ormann TD, Atkins RP (2009)
Nitrate Leaching in Two Irrigated Soils with Different Rates of Cattle
Manure. J Environ Qual 38:2218-2228.
Osawe OW, Läpple D, Hanlon A, Boyle L (2021) Exploring farmers’ attitudes
and determinants of dairy calf welfare in an expanding dairy
sector. J Dairy Sci 104:9967-9980.
Pahmeyer C, Britz W (2020) Economic opportunities of using crossbreed ing and sexing in Holstein dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 103:8218-8230.
Renaud DL, Duffield TF, LeBlanc SJ, Haley DB, Keltonm DF (2017)
Management practices for male calves on Canadian dairy farms. J
Dairy Sci 100:6862-6871.
Rezende EV, Reis IJ, Campos CC, Santos RM (2020) Influence of gestation
length, seasonality, and calf sex on birth weight and placental
retention in crossbred dairy cows. Ciênc Anim Bras 21:e-52881. DOI:
Silva TV, Lima FS, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP (2015) Synchronized ovulation
for first insemination improves reproductive performance and
reduces cost per pregnancy in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 98:7810-7822.
Touchberry RW (1992) Crossbreeding Effects in Dairy Cattle: The Illinois
Experiment, 1949 to 1969. J Dairy Sci 75:640-667.
Weaber RL (2015) Crossbreeding strategies: including Terminal vs. Maternal
crosses. In: Proceeding, 24th Annual Range Beef Cow Symposium.
p. 117-130.
Weaber RL (2021) Crossbreeding for commercial beef production. In:
Beef sire selection manual. National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium,
p: 31-39.
Wolfová M, Wolf J,. Kvapilík J, Kica J (2007) Selection for Profit in Cattle:
II. Economic Weights for Dairy and Beef Sires in Crossbreeding
Systems. J Dairy Sci 90:2456-2467.
