Enhancing Poultry Meat Quality: A Comparative Study of Conventional Vs Organic Cobb 500 Broiler Production
Resumen
Global poultry production has expanded rapidly, aligned with the ever-increasing human population. Customers believe that meat from free-range chickens is healthier and more flavorful than meat from poultry raised through intensive methods. This belief arises from insights into consumer awareness regarding chicken meat from free-range production. This study focuses on the quality of poultry meat of organic output using Cobb 500 broilers. To assess carcass characteristics, nutritional quality, and sensory evaluation, 30 chickens from the organic production were slaughtered at ages between 42 to 45 days for conventional chickens and 65 days and older for organic chickens. The organic chicken had a protein content of 22.8% and a fat content of 1.6%, while they contained 72.7% moisture and 1.6% ash. The organic meat achieved a mean rank of 6.50±0.51 for overall acceptability in sensory quality. Based on the results, adopting organic poultry production is likely a better option in terms of nutrients and flavor. Therefore, transitioning the production system for Cobb 500 from conventional to organic will provide tastier and healthier meat for consumers in the future, with further analysis of production costs.
Article Details
- Cómo citar
-
Geethasuvani, I., Nikzaad, R., & Musthafa, M. (2026). Enhancing Poultry Meat Quality: A Comparative Study of Conventional Vs Organic Cobb 500 Broiler Production. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 77(2), 10461–10468. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.41729
- Número
- Vol. 77 Núm. 2 (2026)
- Sección
- Research Articles

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.