Effects of organic acid treated legume forages on in vitro degradability values
Publiée :
Ιουλ 19, 2023
Mis à jour :
2023-07-19
Résumé
In this context, we aimed to investigate the effects of varying levels of Fumaric Acid (Fu), Malic Acid (Ma), Formic Acid (Fo), and their combinations on in-vitro degradability parameters, organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy lactation (NEL) of alfalfa (Medicago polymorphia), white clover (Trifolium repens) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Obtained data were analyzed as a completely randomized 3×8 factorial design, with GLM using SAS 9.4. The effects of legume forages and their interacion with organic acid were significant on ME, NEL and OMD values (p<0.05, p<0.01). in such a way that fumaric acid was led to an increase NEL. All of the parameters, except ME and OMD, were affected by organic acids (p<0.01). To conclude, utilization of organic acids could increase NEL, reduce the fermentation of insoluble fraction (b) and potential extent of gas production (a+b) from ruminants and reduce rapidly soluble fraction (a) (malic acid treatment only).
Article Details
- Comment citer
-
Palangi, V., Macit, M., & Kilic, U. (2023). Effects of organic acid treated legume forages on in vitro degradability values. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 74(2), 5807–5814. https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.30344 (Original work published 6 juillet 2023)
- Numéro
- Vol. 74 No 2 (2023)
- Rubrique
- Research Articles
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Références
Abas I, Ozpınar H, Kutay HC, Kahraman R, Eseceli H (2005) Determination of the metabolizable energy (ME) and net energy lactation
(NEL) contents of some feeds in the Marmara region by in-vitro gas
technique. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 29:
-757.
AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th
ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington.
Ayaşan T, Çetinkaya N, Aykanat S, Çelik C (2020) Nutrient contents and
in-vitro digestibility of different parts of corn plant. South African
Journal of Animal Science 50(2): 302-309.
Aydin D (2008) Fertilizer instead of Romanian liquid in in-vitro gas production technique. Master Thesis. K.S.İ.Ü. Science. Ins. Kahramanmaras. Turkey.
Boga M, Ayasan T (2022) Determination of Nutritional Value of Alfalfa
Varieties and Lines by Using the in-vitro Method and Gas Production
Technique. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society 73(1):
-3620.
Boga M, Yurtseven S, Kilic U, Aydemir S, Polat T (2014) Determination
of nutrient contents and in-vitro gas production values of some legume forages grown in the Harran plain saline soils. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27(6): 825-831.
Bruno-Soares AM, Cadima J, Matos T (2010) Predicting degradability
parameters of diets for ruminants using regressions on chemical components. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90: 949-955.
Canbolat O, Kara H, Filya İ (2013) Comparison of in-vitro gas production, metabolic energy, organic matter digestion and microbial protein
production of some legume roughages. The Journal of Agricultural
Faculty of Bursa Uludag University 27: 71-81.
Canbolat O, Karaman Ş (2009) In-vitro gas production, organic matter
digestion, relative feed value and metabolic energy contents of some
legume roughages. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15 (2): 188-195.
Danielsson R, Werner-Omazic A, Ramin M, Schnurer A, Griinari M,
Dicksved J, Bertilsson J (2014) Effects on enteric methane production
and bacterial and archaeal communities by the addition of cashew
nut shell extract or glycerol-An in-vitro evaluation. Journal of Dairy
Science 97: 5729-5741.
Elahi MY, Kargar H, Salehi Dindarlou M, Kholif AE, Elghandour MY,
Rojas-Hernandez S, Odongo NE, Salem AZM (2017) The chemical composition and in-vitro digestibility evaluation of almond tree
(Prunus dulcis D. A. Webb syn. Prunus amygdalus; var. Shokoufeh)
leaves versus hulls and green versus dry leaves as feed for ruminants.
Agroforestry Systems 91: 773-780.
Elahi MY, Nia MM, Salem AZM, Mansouri H, Olivares-Perez J, Kholif
AE (2014) Effect of polyethylene glycol on in-vitro gas production
kinetics of Prosopis cineraria leaves at different growth stages. Italian
Journal Animal Science 13: 363-368.
Elghandour MMY, Kholif AE, Marquez-Molina O, Vazquez- Armijo JF,
Puniya AK, Salem AZM (2015) Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixture on in-vitro rumen gas production kinetics
of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 39(4): 435-
Gul M, Tekce E (2017) Organic Acids: Organic Acids and Their Use in
Animal Nutrition. Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases 3 (1):
-63.
Gursoy E, Macit M (2015) Determination of in-vitro gas production values of some legume forage crops grown naturally in the province of
Erzurum. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30 (3): 292-299.
Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris
CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at
regional and continental scales. Ecology Letters 8(10): 1066-1074.
Kamalak A (2006) Determination of nutritive value of leaves of a native
grown shrub Glycyrrhiza glabra L. using in-vitro and in situ measurement. Small Ruminant Research 64: 268-278.
Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Ozkan CO, Atalay AI (2011) Effect of thymol on
in-vitro gas production, digestibility and metabolizable energy content of alfalfa hay. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi
(2): 211-216.
Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Ozay O, Ozkan CO, Sakarya M
(2004) Chemical composition and in-vitro gas production characteristics of several tannin containing tree leaves. Livestock Research for
Rural Development 16 (6).
Karabulut A, Canbolat O, Kalkan H, Gurbuzol F, Sucu E, Filya I (2007)
Comparison of in-vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, organic
matter digestibility and microbial protein production of some legume
hays. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20(4): 517-522.
Kaya S (2008) Relative feed value and relative roughage quality index in
evaluation of roughages. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews 1(1):
-64.
Kilic A (2006) Determination of quality in roughages. Assistant Course
Book. Hasad Publishing, 159 p.
Kilic U, Saricicek BZ (2006) Factors affecting results in in-vitro gas production technique. Animal Products 47 (2): 54-61.
Kilic U, Saricicek BZ (2007) Effects of roughage storage type on in-vitro
gas production amount, gas production parameters and energy contents. 5. National Animal Science Congress, P.69. 05-08 September,
Van.
Kilic U (2005) Determination of Some Fermentation Products and Energy
Content by Using in-vitro Gas Production Technique of Some Feed
Raw Materials Used in Ruminant Feeding. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ.
Science Bil. Inst. (Doctoral Thesis) Samsun.
Lei Y, Hannoufa A, Prates LL, Shi H, Wang Y, Biligetu B, Christensen
D, Yu P (2018) Effects of TT8 and HB12 silencing on the relations
between the molecular structures of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants
and their nutritional profiles and in-vitro gas production. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66: 5602−5611.
Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value
obtained from chemical analysis and in-vitro gas production using
rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28: 7-55.
NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Rev. Ed. National
Academic Sci., Washington, DC.
Ørskov ER, McDonald I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in
the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate
of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92: 499-503.
Palangi V, Macit M, Nadaroglu H, Taghizadeh A (2022) Effects of
green-synthesized CuO and ZnO nanoparticles on ruminal mitigation
of methane emission to the enhancement of the cleaner environment.
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 1-9.
Palangi V, Macit M (2021) Indictable mitigation of methane emission
using some organic acids as additives towards a cleaner ecosystem.
Waste and Biomass Valorization 12: 4825-4834.
Palangi V, Macit M (2019) In situ crude protein and dry matter ruminal
degradability of heat-treated barley. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire
: 123-128.
Palangi V, Safamehr A (2016) The determination of nutritive value of alfalfa in different cuts using nylon bags and gas production techniques.
Journal of Research in Animal Nutrition 2(3): 1-7.
Palangi V (2019) Effects of processing legume forages with organic acids
on in-vitro gas production, rumen fermentation and methane production. Ataturk Uni. Department of Animal Science. (Doctoral Thesis)
Erzurum. Turkey.
SAS Institute Inc (2018) SAS/CONNECT® 9.4 User’s Guide. Fourth
Edition. Cary. NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Shaver RD (2004) Forage quality variation. Mid-South Ruminant Nutrition Conference, Arlington.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WA (1976) Statistical methods (6th ed.). Ames,
Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.
Sui MX (2018) Correlation research between gas production characteristics and CNCPS components for roughages. 4th International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Earth and Environmental Science 185: 012015.
Taghizadeh A, Safamehr A, Palangi V, Mehmannavaz Y (2008) The determination of metabolizable protein of some feedstuffs used in ruminant. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3: 804-806.
Tian J, Yu Y, Yu Z, Shao T, Na R, Zhao M (2014) Effects of lactic acid
bacteria inoculants and cellulase on fermentation quality and in-vitro
digestibility of Leymus chinensis silage. Grassland Science 60: 199-
Tilley JMA, Terry RAA (1963) Two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18:
-111.
Tunc AE, Cufadar Y, Yaman S (2017) Estimation of relationship between
in situ and in-vitro rumen protein degradability of extruded full fat
soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 5(10): 1237-1242.
Uslu OS, Kurt O, Kaya E, Kamalak A (2018) Effect of species on chemical composition, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility
and methane production of some legume plants grown in Turkey.
Journal of Applied Animal Research 46(1): 1158-1161.
Van Soest PJ, Wine RH, Moore LA (1966) Estimation of the true digestibility of forages by the in-vitro digestion of cell walls. In: Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress. Finnish Grassl.
Assoc., Helsinki, Finland, pp. 438-441
