Comparison of early stage electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and histopathologic results of partial pericardiectomy and thoracoscopic pericardial window techniques in an animal model


H. SALCI
M. KOCATURK
V. VOLKAN IPEK
M. BICER
Z. YILMAZ
A. SAMI BAYRAM
Abstract

This study aimed to compare early stage electrocardiographic (ECG), echocardiographic (ECHO) and histopathologic results of the pericardial surgery techniques. Partial pericardiectomy by lateral thoracotomy and thoracoscopic pericardial window techniques was performed under general anesthesia in goats (n=6), which were separated into two groups; partial pericardiectomy was performed in group I (GRI) (n=3) and thoracoscopic pericardial window was performed in group II (GRII) (n=3). ECG and ECHO examinations were performed pre- and postoperatively on days 1, 7 and 30. All experimental animals were sacrificed at the end of day 30 and macroscopic investigations were performed. Histopathological examinations were performed on the lung, visceral pleura, epicardium and myocardial tissues. ECG findings included sinus tachycardia, small complex QRS and T wave peak on day 1 in both groups., The left atrial and ventricular diameters as well as the stroke volume were lower on the 1st postoperative day in both groups. The stroke volume was lower on postoperative days 1 and 30 in GRII. The observed ejection fraction was lower in GRII and higher in GRI on postoperative day 30 compared with their baselines. Macroscopic and histopathological findings of the lung and heart tissues were more severe in GRI, but there was no meaningful variation in the epicardium or visceral pleura. There was no significant difference in the histopathological results between the groups. Although the thoracoscopic pericardial window technique seem less traumatic and better tolerated than partial pericardiectomy, our ECHO and histopathologic results indicate that both techniques can safely be performed by surgeons according to the pericardial disease indication.

Article Details
  • Sezione
  • Research Articles
Downloads
I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Bicer M, Ozdemir B, Kan I, Yuksel A, Tok M, Senkaya I (2015) Long-term outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Cardiothorac Surg 10: 177.
Busch C, Penov K, Amorim PA, Gerbade J, Davierwala P, Schuler GC, Rastan AJ, Mohr FW (2015) Risk factors for mortality after pericardiectomy for constructive pericarditis in a large single-centre cohort. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48: 110-116.
Case JB (2016) Advances in video-assisted thoracic surgery, thoracoscopy. Vet Clin Small Anim 46: 147-169.
Dupre GP, Corlouer JP, Bouvy B (2001) Thoracoscopic pericardiectomy
performed without pulmonary exclusion in 9 dogs. Vet Surg 30: 21-27.
Hardy J, Robertson JT, Reed SM (1992) Constructive pericarditis in a mare: attempted treatment by partial pericardiectomy. Equine Vet J 24: 151-154.
Jackson J, Richter KP, Launer DP (1999) Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy in 13 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 13: 529-533.
Kerstetter KK, Krahwinkel DJ Jr, Millis DL, Hahn K (1997) Pericardiectomy
in dogs: 22 cases (1978-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 15: 736-740.
McCaughan BC, Schaff HV, Piehler JM, Danielson GK, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, Pluth JR, Connolly DC, McGoon DC (1985) Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89: 340-350.
Monnet E (2013) Small Animal Soft Tissue Surgery. 1st ed, Wiley-Blackwell, USA, pp 828-830.
Nath MP, Barman M, Bhattacharrya RK (2014) Severe low cardiac output following pericardiectomy-bird in cage phenomenon. J Vasc Med Surg 2: 135.
Palsgaard-Van Lue A, Strom H, Lee MH, Jensen AL, Birck MM, Wiinberg B, Kjelgaard-Hensen M, Martinussen T, Kristensen AT (2007) Cellular, hemostatic, and inflammatory parameters of the surgical stress response in pigs undergoing partial pericardectomy via open thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc 21: 785-792.
Robles R, Pinero A, Lujan JA, Fernandez JA, Torralba JA, Acosta F, Villegas M, Parrilla P (1997) Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy in the diagnosis and management of pericardial effusion. Surg Endosc 11: 253-256.
Schofield RS, Shoemaker SB, Ryerson EG, Cooper GR, Spotnitz WD (2004) Left ventricular dysfunction after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 1449-1451.
Tiruvoipati R, Naik RD, Loubani M, Billa GN (2003) Surgical approach for pericardiectomy: a comparative study between median sternotomy and left anterolateral thoracotomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2: 322-326.
Vistarini N, Chen C, Mazine A, Bouchard D, Hebert Y, Carrier M, Cartier R, Demers P, Pellerin M, Perrault LP (2015) Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: 20 years of experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. Ann Thorac Surg 100: 107-113.
Wood DE, Crumbley AJ, Pereira NL (2002) Reversible left ventricular dysfunction simulating a myocardial infarction after pericardiectomy. Heart 88: 183-184.