Comparison of cage versus floor rearing systems on broiler performance, welfare and behavioral parameters

PDF (English)
Опубликован: Apr 17, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.35239
B Yilmaz Dikmen
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludağ University, 16059, Bursa, Türkiye
M Gündüz
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludağ University, 16059, Bursa, Türkiye
Аннотация

This study was carried to determine the effects of the floor type (litter rearing and sledge cage system) on performance, welfare and behaviour parameters of broilers. A total of 240 one-day-old Ross 308 male broilers were reared in two different rearing systems; sledge cage system (CS) and litter floor system (FS) until 42 weeks of age. The final body weight and body weight gain between 1-42 days of age were tend to be higher in FS than CS system (P=0.060). The cumulative feed consumption was similar between the  rearing systems at 1-21, 1-28, 1-35 and 1-42 days of age periods (P>0.05). The feed conversion ratio was lower in FS than in CS system (P=0.004). The productivity index was higher in FS than CS system at 1-42 days of age period (P=0.008). The plumage cleanliness score was higher and foot pad dermatitis was lower in FS than in CS (P=0.010 and P=0.0001). The gait score was found similar in both rearing system but numerically lower gait problem was found in FS than CS system (P>0.05). The tonic immobility duration and induction number were found similar in both rearing system (P>0.05). The higher eating, scracthing, wing clap-body shaking, spot pecking; and lesser sleeping behaviour were observed in FS than in CS (P=0.011, P=0.009, P=0.047, P=0.001 and P=0.003; respectively). The drinking, walking, standing and sitting behaviour of broilers were found similar in both rearing system (P>0.05). The wing-leg streching, feather maintanence and pecking each other behaviour of broilers were found similar in both rearing system (P>0.05). The aggressive pecking behaviour was tend to observed more in FS than in CS system (P=0.062). It has been determined that broilers had better performance, welfare and behaviour parameters in the floor-rearing system when the litter condition is good.


Keywords: Behaviour; Broiler; Performance; Rearing systems; Welfare

Article Details
  • Раздел
  • Research Articles
Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

· Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

· Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (preferably in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
Библиографические ссылки
Abdel-Azeem F, Al-Gamal MA, Abd El-Halim HAH, El-Deen AS (2020)
Effect of two housing systems on productive performance and some
physiological traits of broiler chickens reared in enclosed houses.
Egypt J of Appl Sci 35(1):1-12.
Aviagen (2018) Ross broiler management hand book. https://aviagen.com/
assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-EN.
pdf [accessed 14 July 2023].
Azeez JA, Akbay C (2021) An economic analysis of broiler chicken production
for different production rotations in the northern region of
Iraq. TEAD 7(2): 76-89.
Bassler AW, Arnould C, Butterworth A, Colin L, De Jong IC, Ferrante V
(2013) Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness,
negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken
flocks. Poult Sci 92:2811-2826.
Berg CC (2004) Pododermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens. In:
Measuring and auditing broiler welfare. Weeks CA, Butterworth
A(eds.), CABI Publishing CAB International, Wallingford, UK: pp
-49.
Bilcik B, Keeling LJ, Newberry RC (1998) Effect of group size on tonic
immobility in laying hens. Behav Proc 43: 53-59.
Buijs S, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FAM, Keeling L, Rettenbacher S (2009)
Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive
ranges for different indicators. Poult Sci 88:1536-1543.
Broom DM, Johnson KG (2000) Stress and animal welfare. Springer/Kluwer
Scientific & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp.211.
Clark B, Stewart GB, Panzone LA, Kyriazakis I, Frewer LJ (2016) A
systematic review of public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours
towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare. J
Agric Environ Ethics 29: 455-478.
Cockram MS, Dulal KJ (2018) Injury and mortality in broilers during
handling and transport to slaughter. Can J Anim Sci 98(3):416-432.
Costa MJ Da, Grimes JL, Oviedo-Rondón JO, Barasch I, Evans C, Dalmagro
M, Nixon J (2014) Footpad dermatitis severity on turkey flocks
and correlations with locomotion, litter conditions, and body weight
at market age. J Appl Poult Res 23:268-279.
Dawkins MS (2003) Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare.
Zool 106: 383-387.
Ebrahim B, Poorya D, Malihe M, Mohamad B (2013) Effect of different
level of energy to protein ratio and breeding system on performance
and carcass characteristics of male and female broilers. Int J Agric
Res Rev 3:597-607.
Edens FW, Parkhurst CR, Havenstein GB (1999) The effects of conventional
versus cage housing and inorganic versus organic selenium on
feathering in broilers. In: Proceedings of Alltechs 15th annual symposium,
Biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Under the Microscope-Focal
Points for the New Millennium); Nottingham University Press,
Nottingham, UK: 567-577.
El-Deek A, El-Sabrout K (2019) Behaviour and meat quality of chicken
under different housing systems. World’s Poult Sci J 75(1):105-114.
El-Kazaz SE (2018) Evaluation of behavior and welfare in broilers reared
in two different housing systems. Assiut Vet Med J 64(157):94-98.
Farida TE, Hanafi ND, Tafsin M (2022) Comparative study of broiler
chicken performance in closed house and conventional system in
North Sumatera. In: Proocedings of the 5th international conference
on agriculture, environment, and food security, IOP Conf. Series:
Earth and Environmental Sci 977: 012138.
Fouad MA, Abdel Razek AH, Badawy EM (2008) Broilers welfare and
economics under two management alternatives on commercial scale.
Int J Poult Sci 7(12):1167-1173.
Fortomaris P, Arsenos G, Tserveni- Gousi A, Yannakopoulos A (2007)
Performance and behaviour of broiler chickens as affected by the
housing system. Arch Geflügelk 71(3):97-104.
Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Stratmann A, Dawkins MS (2021) Groups and individuals:
optical flow patterns of broiler chicken flocks are correlated
with the behavior of individual birds. Animals 11: 568.
Ghareeb K, Awad WA, Sid-Ahmed OE, Bohm J (2014) Insights on the
host stress fear and growth responses to the deoxynivalenol feed contaminant
in broiler chickens. Plos One 9(1):E87727.
Hansen I (1994) Behavioral expression of laying hen in aviaries and cages:
Frequencies, time budgets and facility utilization. Br Poult Sci
:549-557.
Haslam SM, Brown SN, Wilkins L, Kestin SC, Warriss PD, Nicol CJ
(2006) Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or
hock burn to assess aspects of housing conditions for broiler chicken.
Br Poult Sci 47:13-18.
Haslam SM, Knowles TG, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ, Kestin SC, Warriss
PD, Nicol CJ (2007) Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis,
hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. Brit Poult Sci
(3):264-275.
Jhetam S, Buchynski K, Shynkaruk T, Schwean-Lardner K (2022) Evaluating
the effects of stocking density on the behavior, health, and welfare
of turkey hens to 11 weeks of age. Poult Sci 101:101956.
Jones RB (1997) Animal welfare: fear and distress. Wallingford (UK):
CAB International.
Lehner PN (1992) Sampling methods in behaviours research. Poult Sci
:643-649.
May F, Stracke J, Heitmann S, Adler C, Krasny, A, Kemper N, Spindler
B (2022) Structuring broiler barns: how a perforated flooring system
affects animal behavior. Animals; 12, 735.
Michel V, Prampart E, Mirabito L, Allain V, Arnould C, Huonnic D, Bouquin
SL, Albaric O (2012) Histologically validated footpad dermatitis
scoring system for use in chicken processing plants. Brit Poult Sci
(3):275-81.
Minitab (2013) MINITAB release 17.1.0, Minitab Inc, USA.
Prabakaran R (2003) Good practices in planning and management of integrated
commercial poultry production in South Asia. FAO Animal
Production and Health Paper 159: 106.
Rudra PG, Hasan T, Rony AH, Adrian G, Debnath A, Islam F, Paul P
(2018) Economic Profitability of Broiler Farm Comparing the Two
Commercial Broiler Strain. Austin J Vet Sci & Anim Husb 5(2):1045.
Sans ECO, Tuyttens FAM, Taconeli CA, Rueda PM, Ciocca JR, Molento
CFM (2021) Welfare of broiler chickens reared under two different
types of housing. Anim Welf 30:341-353.
Santos FBO, Santos AA, Oviedo-Rondon EO, Ferket PR (2012) Influence
of housing system on growth performance and intestinal health of
salmonella-challenged broiler chickens. Curr Res Poult Sci 2:1-10.
SAS (2020) A user’s guide to SAS software V9.4.M7. SAS Institute, Inc.,
Cary, NC.
Schütz KE, Jensen P (2001) Effects of resource allocation on behavioral
strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two
domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethol 107:753-765.
Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010) Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poult
Sci 89:2043-2051.
Shields S, Greger M (2013) Animal welfare and food safety aspects of
confining broiler chickens to cages. Animals 3(2):386-400.
Sogunle OM, Egbeyale LT, Bajomo TT, Bamigboje OV, Fanimo AO
(2008) Comparison of the performance, carcass characteristics and
haematological parameters of broiler chicks reared in cage and floor.
Pak J Biol Sci 11(3):480-483.
Sosnowka-Czajka E, Muchacka R (2005) Effect of management system
on behaviour and productivity of broiler chickens. In: Proceedings of
the 12th ISAH congress on Animal Hygiene, Warsaw, Animals and
environment 2:106-110.
Swain BK, Sundaram RNS, Barbuddhe SB, Nirmale AV (2002) Influence
of cage and deep litter rearing systems on the performance of broilers.
Indian Vet J 79:467-469.
Thamilvanan T, Thiagarajan M, Ramesh V, Gnanaraj PT, Sivakumar T
(2001) Performance of broiler chicken under cage and floor systems
of management fed differently processed feeds. Indian J Anim Sci
:985-988.
Thorp BH, Duff SRI (1988) Effect of exercise on the vascular pattern in
the bone extremities of broiler fowl. Res Vet Sci 45:72-77.
Tolon B, Yalcin S (1997) Bone characteristics and body weight of broilers
in different husbandry systems. Br Poult Sci 38:132-135.
Van Horne PLM, Achterbosch TJ (2007) Animal welfare in poultry production
systems: Impact of European Union standards on world trade.
World’s Poult Sci J 64(1):40-52.
Wang Y, Ru YJ, Liu GH, Chang WH, Zhang S, Yan HJ, Zheng AJ, Lou
RY, Liu ZY, Cai HY (2015) Effects of different rearing systems on
growth performance, nutrients digestibility, digestive organ weight,
carcass traits, and energy utilization in male broiler chickens. Livest
Sci 176:135-140.
Wang L, Zhang Y, Kong L, Wang Z, Bai H, Jiang Y, Bi Y, Chang G, Chen
G (2021) Effects of rearing system (floor vs. cage) and sex on performance,
meat quality and enteric microorganism of yellow feather
broilers. J Integr Agric 20(7):1907-1920.
Weber Wyneken C, Sinclair A, Veldkamp T, Vinco LJ, Hocking PM
(2015) Footpad dermatitis and pain assessment in turkey poults using
analgesia and objective gait analysis. Br Poult Sci 56:522-530.
Welfare Quality (2009) Welfare Quality assesment protocol for poultry
(broiler, laying hens). Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands.
ISBN: 9789078240068.
Willis WL, Murray C, Talbott C (2002) Campylobacter isolation trends
of cage versus floor broiler chickens: a one-year study. Poult Sci
(5):629-631.
Yan L, ZZ, LV, An S, Xing K, Wang ZG, MB, LV, Choct M, Guo M, Zhou
GL (2021) Effects of rearing system and narasin on growth performance,
gastrointestinal development, and gut microbiota of broilers.
Poult Sci 100(3): 100840.
Zulkifli I, Norsam NS, Silahuddin MF, Awad EA (2021) Growth performance,
well-being, and gut microbial population of broilers raised in
cages and floor pens under the hot and humid tropical climate. Ital J
Anim Sci 20(1): 383-394.