GenAI for speech writing in the training of Maltese conference interpreters for the European Union

PDF
Published: Jan 28, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ijltic.44157
Keywords:
GenAI conference interpreting interpreter training European Union speech writing Speech Repository Maltese low-resource language interinstitutional accreditation test
Amy Colman
University of Malta
Abstract

The present paper explores the potential of GenAI tools in generating speeches to prepare for the European Union’s interinstitutional accreditation test. A small-scale experimental empirical study was conducted in which interpreting students were instructed to annotate, critically assess and compare English and Maltese speeches generated by three GenAI tools, viz., Gemini, Copilot and ChatGPT, to be used for beginner consecutive interpretation practice. The GenAI tools were prompted to generate three English and three Maltese speeches modelled on those in the European Commission’s Speech Repository. The analysis focuses on compliance with the prompt, suitability for purpose and linguistic output quality. The results indicate that, upon initial analysis, the speeches in both languages satisfy many of the criteria in the prompt. However, more thorough scrutiny reveals that the speeches may prove challenging for trainees to interpret, primarily due to their poor argumentative structure, low factual density, lack of clear links and intent, and low terminological complexity. In addition, the speech topics are excessively simplistic, not well-researched and insufficiently nuanced. The differences between English, a high-resource language, and Maltese, a low-resource language, are minimal. The main discrepancy between the two is the higher number of linguistic errors in Maltese. Overall, the results indicate that the speeches in both languages require extensive post-editing to meet their intended use.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Hamouda, A. M. (2023). Re-Thinking Data Strategy and Integration for Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, Opportunities, and Challenges. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7082.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127082
Amato, A., Russo, M., Carioli, G., & Spinolo, N. (2025). Technology for training in conference interpreting. In E. Davitti, T. Korybski & S. Braun (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, Technology and AI (pp. 156-177). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003053248-13
Baigorri-Jalón, J. (2021). Once upon a time at the ILO: The infancy of simultaneous interpreting. In K. G. Seeber (Ed.), 100 years of conference interpreting: A legacy (pp. 1–24). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., Do, Q. V., Xu, Y., & Fung, P. (2023). A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity. AACL, 675–718.
Colman, A. (2025). GenAI for self-directed individual and collaborative learning in the training of conference interpreters for the European Union institutions. L10N Journal, 1(4), 21–44.
Defrancq, B. (2023). Technology in interpreter education and training: A structured set of proposals. In G. Corpas Pastor & B. Defrancq (Eds.), Interpreting technologies – Current and future trends (pp. 302–319). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
ELIS. (2025). ELIS report. https://elis-survey.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ELIS-2025_Report.pdf. Last accessed on 29 November 2025.
Fantinuoli, C. (2022). Conference interpreting and new technologies. In M. Albl-Mikasa & E. Tiselius (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of conference interpreting (pp. 508–522). Routledge.
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814
Gillies, A. (2024). Conference interpreting: A student’s practice book (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Giustini, D., & Dastyar, V. (2024). Critical AI literacy for interpreting in the age of AI. Interpreting and Society, 4(2), 196–213.
https://doi.org/10.1177/27523810241247259
Green, B. P. (2018). Ethical reflections on artificial intelligence. Scientia et Fides, 6(2), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2018.015
Hatiarová, P. (2025). AI in interpreting training. L10N Journal, 1(4), 45–66.
Horváth, I. (2022). AI in interpreting: Ethical considerations. Across Languages and Cultures, 23(1), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2022.00108
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
Kollárová, K., & Tonková, L. (2025). The use of generative artificial intelligence in interpreter preparation. L10N Journal, 1(4), 67–109.
Li, Z. (2026), A Study on the Impact and Insights of Technology on Interpreting Education, In A. K. F. Cheung, D. Li, K. Liu & R. Moratto (Eds.), Technology and Interpreting, Navigating the Digital Age (pp. 109-120). Routledge.
Lin, X. V., Mihaylov, T., Artetxe, M., Wang, T., Chen, S., Simig, D., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Bhosale, S., Du, J., Pasunuru, R., Shleifer, S., Koura, P. S., Chaudhary, V., O’Horo, B., Wang, J., Zettlemoyer, L., Kozareva, Z., Diab, M., Stoyanov, V., & Li, X. (2022). Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Generative Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 9019–9052). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Mei, L. (2024). Human-Machine Interaction Translation under Artificial Intelligence and Big Data: Analysis from the Perspective of Text Stratification and Corpus Construction. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 1007–1025.
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1478
Pym, A., & Hao, Y. (2025). How to Augment Language Skills: Generative AI and Machine Translation in Language Learning and Translator Training. Routledge.
Sheikh, H., Prins, C., & Schrijvers, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: Definition and Background. In Mission AI: The new system technology (pp. 15–41). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21448-6_2
Šveda, P., & Poláček, I. (2025). Interpreter Training in the Age of AI. L10N Journal, 1(4), 5–20.
Tiselius, E. (2025). Conference interpreting explained. Routledge.
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the Future of Higher Education: A threat to Academic Integrity or Reformation? Evidence from Multicultural Perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6