Capitalist Realism and the Refrain: The Libidinal Economies of Degas


Published: May 1, 2011
Keywords:
impressionism realism painting photography art degas
Dougal Philips
Abstract
This article looks to the work of Degas as an exemplar of a kind of Capitalist Realism, a kind of second generation realism following on from the earlier work of Courbet and Manet. It is posited here that Degas took up the mantle of a ‘corporeal’ realism distinguished from the Impressionists by its nuanced approach to the realism of the body, in particular to its place in the Parisian network of capital and desire. Degas’s paintings and his experiments with photography mapped two spaces: the space of the libidinal and capitalist exchange (theatre, café, stock-exchange) and the space of the production of painting. Further, Degas attempts to represent his own disappearance into both these spaces. Degas continued the politicised social project of realism but with a personalised, modernised vision that prefigures the realisms of the twentieth century.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Author Biography
Dougal Philips
Philip Davis is Head of School of Arts at University of Liverpool and editor of The Reader. His publications include Memory and Writing: From Wordsworth to Lawrence (Liverpool University Press, 1983), The Experience of Reading (Routledge, 1992), The Victorians 1830-1880, new Oxford English Literature Series (Oxford University Press, 2002) and Why Victorian Literature Still Matters (Blackwell, 2008). He has edited Selected Writings of John Ruskin (Everyman, 1995), Real Voices on Reading (Macmillan, 1997) and an anthology of religious poems, All the Days of My Life (Dent, 1999). In addition he is the author of Sudden Shakespeare (Athlone and St Martin’s Press, 1996), Shakespeare Thinking (2006) and the internationally acclaimed biography Bernard Malamud: A Writer’s Life (Oxford University Press, 2007).
References
Armstrong, Carol M. Odd Man Out: Readings of the Work and Reputation of Edgar Degas. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991.
Bataille, Georges. “The Object of Desire and the Totality of the Real.” The Bataille Reader. Ed. Fred Botting and Scott Wilson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. 264-70.
Bersani, Leo. “Pynchon, Paranoia and Literature.” Representations 25 (1989): 99-118.
Bryson, Norman. “Gaze in an Expanded Field.” Vision and Visuality. Ed. Hal Foster. New York: New Press, 1988. 87-114.
Callen, Anthea. The Spectacular Body: Science, Method, and Meaning in the Work of Degas. New Haven: Yale UP, 1995.
Clark, T. J. The Painting of Modern Life. London: Thames & Hudson, 1985.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. “Year Zero: Faciality.” A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987. 185-211.
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.
Foster, Hal. The Return of the Real: Art and Theory at the End of the Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
Harrison, Charles. “Degas’ Bathers and Other People.” Modernism/Modernity 6.3 (1999): 57-90.
Harrison, Charles. Painting the Difference: Sex and Spectator in Modern Art. Chicago: Chicago UP, 2006.
Kuspit, Donald. “Between Solitude and Intimacy: Edgar Degas and the Realism of Illusion.” Arts Magazine (March 1989): 59-62.
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Presence.” The Language of Art History. Ed. Salim Kemal and Ivan Gaskell. Cambridge UP, 1991. 11-34.
Nochlin, Linda. “A House is Not a Home: Degas and the Subversion of the Family.” Representing Women. London: Thames & Hudson, 1999. 152-179.
Prendeville, Brendan. “Merleau-Ponty, Realism and Painting: Psychophysical Space and the Space of Exchange.” Art History 22.3 (1999): 364-388.
Woodward, Ashley. “Jean-François Lyotard.” University of Queensland, 2002. 14 Dec. 2005. http://www.iep.utm.edu/lyotard/