test Electronic health record in the general health system of Cyprus: Evaluation of users' satisfaction levels|Health & Research Journal HealthResJ, health, medicine, nursing, research https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/HealthResJ/sitemap

Electronic health record in the general health system of Cyprus: Evaluation of users' satisfaction levels

PDF
Published: Oct 1, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.40372
Keywords:
Cyprus Electronic Health Record General Health System satisfaction user
Periklis Rompolas
BSc, MSc, MEd, PGCert, PhD(c), Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
Panicos Masouras
BSc, MSc, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
Sotiris Avgousti
BSc, MSc, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
Andreas Charalambous
BSc, MSc, PGCert, PhD, Professor, Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
Abstract

Background: The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a technological tool for eHealth that is a strategic priority internationally in health systems. Since 2019, Cyprus has universally applied the EHR in the General Health System (GHS). This study aimed to assess the levels of satisfaction among EHR users in the GHS of Cyprus.  


Material and Method: During the period from October to December 2022 the first cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate users’ satisfaction levels of EHR through an online self-reporting questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed electronically using the convenience sampling method and included questions about demographic characteristics and satisfaction. A total of 429 physicians participated in the study.


Results: According to the results, moderate users’ satisfaction levels of the EHR were found. There was also a statistically significant relationship between satisfaction with the EHR and factors such as age, years of professional practice, familiarity with the use of ICT and familiarity with EHR, education/training provision prior to the use of EHR and support during the daily practice. The study’s limitations include the absence of a comparative sample of other healthcare professionals, such as nurses, and the reliance on international data for comparison, owing to the lack of relevant scientific evidence from Cyprus.


Conclusions: To fulfill Cyprus’ strategic goals for eHealth, within the European framework, health policy makers should implement EHR improvements in the context of GHS. Users’ training, support and equal access for all health professionals are essential. Finally, new studies must be conducted in the rapidly changing field, so that new developments can be identified and results compared so that enhancements, new services and functionalities are implemented for the benefit of the citizens.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Original Articles

Copyright notice:

The journal "Health and Research Journal" reserves the rights for copyright of the content of the website and also the copyright of the articles published.

By virtue of their appearance in this journal, the articles are free to be used for non-commercial purposes. However, the articles cannot and must not be used in anyway, published elsewhere or modified without any reference to the author and the first publication of the article.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Sementilli S, D’Auria S and Mori AR. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Cyprus. Report, eHealth ERA, Italy, 2007.
Milieu Ltd and Time.Lex. Overview of the national laws on electronic health records in the EU Member States. National Report for Cyprus. Report no. 20136302, 7 April 2014. Brussels: Milieu Ltd.
General Health System of Cyprus. Organisation’s Role and Mandate: The HIO is the executive authority for the implementation of the GHS. Available from: https://www.gesy.org.cy/sites/Sites?d=Desktop&locale=en_US&lookuphost=/en-us/&lookuppage=hioroleandresponsibilities (2022, asseced 20 October 2024).
Papaioannou M, Neocleous A, Savva P, et al. Α Proto-type of the National EHR system for Cyprus. In: 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineer-ing in Medicine & Biology Society (ed ΙΕΕΕ), Virtual Conference, 1-5 November 2021. paper no. EMBC46164, pp. 2159–2162. NJ: ΙΕΕΕ.
The Coalition. Cyprus: An overview of digital skills, https://digitalcoalition.gov.cy/about/ (2023, accessed 22 September 2024).
Pattichis CS, Schizas CN and Andreou AS. Healthcare telematic applications in Cyprus. Methods of Infor-mation in Medicine 2002; 41(5): 376–381.
Theodorou M, Charalambous C, Petrou C, et al. Cyprus: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition 2012; 14(6): 1–128.
Neokleous KC, Schiza EC, Salameh E, et al. A National Electronic Health Record System for Cyprus. In: IIIX Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing (ed LM Roa Romero), Se-ville, Spain, 25-28 September 2013, paper no. IFMBE 41, pp. 1318–1321, NY: Springer International Pub-lishing.
Schiza EC, Neokleous KC, Petkov N, et al. A patient centered electronic health: EHealth system develop-ment. Technology and Healthare 2015; 23(4): 509–522.
Antoniou Z, Schiza EC, Neokleous K, et al. EHealth services for the european reference network on rare anaemias (eENERCA). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2015; 213(July): 153–156.
Antoniou Z, Constantinou I, Neophytou M, et al. De-ployment of Generic Cross Border eHealth Services in Cyprus. In: 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (ed IEEE), Jeju Island, Korea, 11-15 July 2017. paper no. EMBC17_2758, p.1. NJ: ΙΕΕΕ.
Stylianides A, Mantas J, Pouloukas S, et al. Evaluation of th Intergrated Health Information System (IHIS) in Public Hospitals in Cyprus Utilizing thw DISPA Frame-work. Acta Inform Medica 2019; 27(4): 240–244.
Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, et al. Effects of elec-tronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life 2020; 10(12): 1–27.
Alanazi B, Butler-Henderson K and Alanazi MR. Factors influencing healthcare professionals’ perception to-wards EHR/EMR systems in gulf cooperation council countries: A systematic review. Oman Med J 2020; 35(5): 1–18.
Alsohime F, Temsah M, Al- Eadhy A, et al. Satisfaction and perceived usefullness with newly- implemented eletronic health record system among pediatricians at a university hospital. Comput Methods Programs Bio-med 2019; 169: 51–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.026
Bakken V, Sc M, Koposov R, Røst TB, et al. Attitudes of Norwegian Mental Health Service Users Toward Elec-tronic Medical Records Storage and Use EHRs and Ser-vice Users ’ Involvement. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 73(9): 1–10.
Bani-Issa W, Al Yateem N, Al Makhzoomy IK, et al. Sat-isfaction of health-care providers with electronic health records and perceived barriers to its implemen-tation in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Nurs Pract 2016; 22(4): 408–16. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12450
Denton CA, Soni HC, Kannampallil TG, et al. Emergen-cy Physicians’ Perceived Influence of EHR Use on Clin-ical Workflow and Performance Metrics. Appl Clin In-form 2018; 9(3): 725–733.
Doberne JW, Redd T, Lattin D, et al. Perspectives and uses of the electronic health record among US pedia-tricians: A national survey. J Ambul Care Manage 2017; 40(1): 59–68.
Holanda AA, do Carmo e Sa HL, Gomes Fernades Vieira AP, et al. Use and Satisfaction with Electronic Health Record by Primary Care Physicians in a Health District in Brazil. J Mes Syst 2012; 36: 3141–3149. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9801-3.
Joukes E, De Keizer NF, De Bruijne MC, et al. Impact of Electronic versus Paper-Based Recording before EHR Implementation on Health Care Professionals’ Percep-tions of EHR Use, Data Quality, and Data Reuse. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10(2): 199–209.
Paré G, Raymond L, de Guinea AO, et al. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84(10): 857–867.
Hendrix N, Bazemore A, Holmgren AJ, et al. Variation in Family Physicians’ Experiences Across Different Electronic Health Record Platforms: a Descriptive Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38(13): 2980-2987.
Frisina PG, Munene EN, Finnie J, et al. Analysis of end-user satisfaction with electronic health records in col-lege/university healthcare. J Am Coll Heal 2022; 70(3): 717–723.
Garcia G and Crenner C. Comparing International Ex-periences With Electronic Health Records Among Emergency Medicine Physicians in the United States and Norway: Semistructured Interview Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9(1): e28762. doi: 10.2196/28762
Rotenstein LS, Apathy N, Landon B, et al. Assessment of Satisfaction With the Electronic Health Record Among Physicians in Physician-Owned vs Non-Physician-Owned Practices. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5(4): E228301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8301
Kissel A, Maddox K, Francis J, et al. Effects of the elec-tronic health record on job satisfaction of academic pediatric faculty. International Journal of Medical In-formatics 2022; 168:104881. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104881
Lintvedt O, Marco-Ruiz L and Pedersen R. User Satis-faction with Recently Deployed Electronic Health Rec-ords. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2023; 302(1): 192–196. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230101
Elkefi S and Onur A. Exploring physicians’ satisfaction with electronic health records and their features: A na-tionwide survey study. In: 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE). Vienna, Austria, 24-26 October 2022, paper no. ISSE 54508, pp. 1-5. NJ: IEEE.
Upadhyay S and Hu HF. A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on Healthcare Quality and Safety: Clinicians’ Lived Experi-ences. Heal Serv Insights 2022; 15(1): 1–7.
Laerum H and Faxvaag A. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Task-oriented evaluation of elec-tronic medical records systems: development and vali-dation of a questionnaire for physicians. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2004; 4(1): 1–16.
Paganas A, Lappa E, Garmiri V, et al. Greek Translation and Adaptation of the “Evaluation of the Electronic Health Record” questionnaire. Interscientific Healthcare 2020; 12(4): 55–71.
Al Alawi S, Al Dhaheri A, Al Baloushi D, et al. Physician user satisfaction with an electronic medical records system in primary healthcare centres in Al Ain: A quali-tative study. BMJ Open 2014; 4(11): 1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005569
Sockolow P, Bowles K, Lehmann H, et al. Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: A multimethod study. CIN - Comput Informatics Nurs 2012; 30(6): 300–311. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb561
Raglan G, Margolis B, Paulus R, Schulkin J. Electronic Health Record adoption among obstetrician/ gyne-cologists in the United States: Physician practices and satisfaction. J Healthc Qual. 2017;39(3):144–52. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12072
Bajwa NK, Singh H and De KK. Impact of EHR Tech-nology Implementation on Physicians’ Job Satisfac-tion. Int J Appl Manag Technol 2019; 18(1): 111–125. doi: 10.5590/ijamt.2019.18.1.08
Secginli S, Erdogan S and Monsen KA. Attitudes of health professionals towards electronic health records in primary health care settings: A questionnaire survey. Informatics Heal Soc Care 2014; 39(1): 15–32. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2013.834342
El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, et al. Trends in prima-ry care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24(4): 464–468. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z
Hanauer DA, Branford GL, Greenberg G, et al. Two-year longitudinal assessment of physicians’ percep-tions after replacement of a longstanding homegrown electronic health record: Does a J-curve of satisfaction really exist? J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2017; 24(1): 157–165. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw077
Lakbala P and Dindarloo K. Physicians’ perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springer plus 2014; 3(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-63
Entzeridou E, Markopoulou E and Mollaki V. Public and physician’s expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security. Int J Med Inf 2018; 110: 98–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.004
Abed F and Kharroubi A. Factors Influencing Attitudes of Physicians in Lebanon towards the Use of Electronic Health Records. Glob Sci J. 2021;9(4):697–710.
See QY. Attitudes and Perceptions of General Practi-tioners towards the National Electronic Health Record (NEHR) in Singapore. EMJ 2020; 5(1): 86–93. doi: 10.1177/11786329211070722
Jha AK, Bates DW, Jenter C, et al. Electronic health rec-ords: Use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. J Eval Clin Pract 2009; 15(1): 158–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x
Fragidis LL and Chatzoglou PD. Implementation of a nationwide electronic health record (EHR): The inter-national experience in 13 countries. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2018; 31(2): 116–130. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2016-0136